passed the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) in 1986 in order to broaden the government’s reach regarding wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping.1 Specifically‚ in addition to the wiretapping of telephone calls‚ this act allows the government to wiretap electronic data transmissions by computer as well.
Premium Statutory law Law Court
John Jay College of Criminal Justice Barbara Sanon Government 101 Section 27 Prof. Andreas Karras 05-02-08 The United States has been known world wide as the land of the free‚ the land of opportunity‚ and one the wealthiest countries in the world. The United States have what many call “the greatest form of government known to this world”: democracy. What is democracy? It is defined as “a system of rule that permits citizens to play a significant part in the governmental process”
Premium United States Democracy Republic
in extensive surveillance and data mining. Regarding surveillance‚ in December 2005‚ the New York Times revealed that after September 11‚ the Bush Administration secretly authorized the National Security Administration (NSA) to engage in warrantless wiretapping of American citizens’ telephone calls. As for data mining‚ which involves analyzing personal data for patterns of suspicious behavior‚ the government has begun numerous programs”. (Solove‚ Daniel J.). The Patriot Act increases the government’s
Premium United States Constitution USA PATRIOT Act Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
national security. After the occurrence of the terrorist attacks on September 11‚ 2001‚ President George W. Bush signed a law‚ the PATRIOT Act. The PATRIOT Act made it easier for the law enforcement officials to use certain techniques such as wiretapping and other surveillance technologies to aid in the war against terrorism. The reason why this topic needs to be addressed is located in the following quote: "The probability that people are terrorists given that NSA ’s system of surveillance identifies
Premium USA PATRIOT Act Federal Bureau of Investigation United States Constitution
Because the NSA doesn’t trust its own U.S. citizens‚ violates the fourth amendment‚ and made programs to “hack” us‚ the NSA invades the privacy of citizens and should be stopped. In December 2005‚ New York Times said that the NSA was engaged in warrantless
Premium United States Government Central Intelligence Agency
(Video) Many Americans feel as though the Patriot Act encroaches our 1st and 4th amendments which are the right to free speech and expression‚ as well as protecting the citizens of unwarranted search and seizures. From the government’s warrantless wiretapping‚ obtaining personal info from NSL’s or National Security Letters‚ emails‚ and phone records or unconstitutional surveillance of the citizens of the USA‚ free thinking‚ speech‚ and typical American lifestyle cannot survive in a nation full
Free Federal Bureau of Investigation USA PATRIOT Act American Civil Liberties Union
shall not be violated‚ and no Warrants shall issue‚ but upon probable cause‚ supported by Oath or affirmation‚ and particularly describing the place to be searched‚ and the persons or things to be seized”(Fourth). In some circumstances only are warrantless searches allowed; situations of searches in highly regulated industries‚ hazardous operations‚ and emergency situations. When looking at the case Jones vs. U.S. the main issue is whether placing a GPS device on
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
No. 1 ordering the AFP and the PNP to suppress the rebellion in the NCR. Warrantless arrests of several alleged leaders and promoters of the “rebellion” were thereafter effected. Petitioner filed for prohibition‚ injunction‚ mandamus and habeas corpus with an application for the issuance of temporary restraining order and/or writ of preliminary injunction. Petitioners assail the declaration of Proc. No. 38 and the warrantless arrests allegedly effected by virtue thereof. Petitioners furthermore pray
Premium Legal terms Habeas corpus Injunction
“The government’s power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the government.... The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of the government and inform the people.” —‑U.S. Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black‚ New York Times Co. v. United States (6/30/71) Journalism is supposed to hold power to account. That’s the principle implicit in the U.S. Constitution’s singling out a free press for protection. If that principle were respected‚
Premium National security Central Intelligence Agency Mohammad Reza Pahlavi
for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view. The differentiation between open fields and private property must be made before one can proceed to form an opinion regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of an open field. Oliver v. United States is a case in which police officers‚ acting on reports from neighbors that a patch of marijuana was being cultivated on the Oliver farm‚ entered on to private property ignoring "No Trespassing" signs
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Searches and seizures