Preview

Fourth Amendment Exceptions

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2977 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fourth Amendment Exceptions
The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution states that people have the right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures," but the issue at hand here is whether this also applies to the searches of open fields and of objects in plain view and whether the fourth amendment provides protection over these as well. In order to reaffirm the courts' decision on this matter I will be relating their decisions in the cases of Oliver v. United States (1984), and California v. Greenwood (1988) which deal directly with the question of whether a person can have reasonable expectations of privacy as provided for in the fourth amendment with regards to objects in an open field or in plain view. The differentiation between open fields and private property must be made before one can proceed to form an opinion regarding the constitutionality of a warrantless search of an open field. Oliver v. United States is a case in which police officers, acting on reports from neighbors that a patch of marijuana was being cultivated on the Oliver farm, entered on to private property ignoring "No Trespassing" signs, and on to a secluded open portion of the Oliver property without a warrant, discovered the marijuana patch and then arrested Oliver without an arrest warrant. The Maine Judicial Court held that "No Trespassing" signs posted around the Oliver property "evinced a reasonable expectation of privacy," and therefore the court held that the "open fields" doctrine was not applicable to the Oliver case. Upon hearing the case, the Supreme Court argues that the special protections accorded by the fourth amendment do not extend to open fields. "Open fields do not provide the setting for those intimate activities that the Amendment is intended to shelter from government interference or surveillance." The court refers to the case of Hester v. United States (1924) which set the precedent for "open field cases" and interprets
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    4th Amendment Search & Seizure
    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages

    4th Amendment Search & Seizure

    This is an extremely early case dealing with search and seizure, if not one of the first cases, in which the individuals being searched stood up for themselves because they felt the actions taken against them were unjust. However, since these cases are dated so far back in history it is hard to understand whether our founder fathers could have foreseen any problems with the amendment in the future, and everything that applies under the fourth amendment today. At the end of the eighteenth century this was dealing with pamphlets that the king did not like and tried to extinguish through tearing apart the “offender’s” homes. Is it possible however that even this amendment that was ratified at the end of 1791 can still be completely relevant in our modern society, or does this amendment need a face lift?…

    • 1527 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk
    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stop and Frisk

    The Supreme Court rejected the defendants' arguments. The Court noted that stops and frisks are considerably less intrusive than full-blown arrests and searches. It also observed that the interests in crime prevention and in police safety require that the police have some leeway to act before full probable cause has developed. The Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement is sufficiently flexible to permit an officer to investigate the situation. The "sole justification" for a frisk, said the Court, is the "protection of the police officer and others nearby." Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be "reasonably designed to discover guns,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Did the government go too far
    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Did the government go too far

    Natalie Cornacchia Cornacchia 1 Sims American Government Honors 15 December 2013 Over time, technology has impacted the police and other law enforcement agencies with new devices for gathering evidence. These new tools have caused constitutional questions to surface. One particular case in Oregon of an individual (DLK) aroused such question. DLK was suspected of growing marijuana inside of his home. Agents used a thermal imager to scan DLK’s residence form the outside. The results indicated heat, just like the kind that is generated by special lights used for growing marijuana indoors. Constructed by the scan, a judge issued a search warrant. A warrant – a legal paper authorizing a search – cannot be issued unless there is a cause, and a probable cause must be sworn to by the police officer or prosecutor and approved by a judge. A warrant must describe what is being searched and what will be seized. 100 marijuana plants were found finalizing the arrest of DLK; however, did the scan violate DLK’s Fourth Amendment rights? The Fourth Amendment states, “The right of people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall be issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Constitution). This amendment touches on the expectation of privacy in your home and person. The government is not unable to search you, your home, your belongings, or take your belongings, also known as a seizure, without a good reason. A person’s Fourth Amendment rights may at times seem to delay the world of law enforcement. If the police feel that they have…

    • 987 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights
    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page

    Roy Olmstead's 4th Amendment Rights

    Roy Olmstead was accused of importing and possessing illegal liquors back in 1927. He was later proved guilty by wiretaps installed in his basement. Olmstead tried saying that his 4th and 5th amendment were violated, but in conclusion his 4th amendment rights were not infringed because mere wiretapping does not qualify under a search or seizure. To be searched means that they would physically have to be there searching for something without a warrant that is. They are allowed to do so with a warrant. The vote behind his rights were 5-4 not in his favor. So he was later detained and arrested by the police. In this court case the officials learned a lot about how they should think, they decided that they should not back down in that sort of situation…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Plain View/ Open Fields Case Study
    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plain View/ Open Fields Case Study

    Scott Smith September 14, 2008 Today a high percentage of the arrests done by law enforcement are from seized evidence that was in plain view and does not come under the Fourth Amendment. The plain view doctrine states that items that are within the sight of a police officer who is legally in a place from which the view is made may properly be seized without a warrant as long as such items are immediately recognizable as subject to seizure (Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice 2004). In other instances police can also seize evidence that is in open fields. The open fields doctrine holds that items in open fields are not protected by the Fourth Amendment’s guarantee against unreasonable searches and seizures, so they can properly be taken by an officer without a warrant or probable cause (Criminal Procedure: Law and Practice 2004).…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    4th Amendment
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    4th Amendment

    Courts generally have held the law to be constitutional on its face as an appropriate exercise of authority to protect national security, though historically it has been subject to abuse if applied broadly to otherwise protected activities, such as the right to free speech, rendering it a particularly dangerous tool by which government authorities may silence speech that they consider to be contrary to government interests. Parts of the Patriot Act explicitly allow determinations to be made based on an individual's beliefs or speech. The Patriot Act threatens exclusion not only to those who provide direct support to such organizations as Antifa, but also to those who provide encouragement. This activity could have a devastating effect on the…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment Case Study
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fourth Amendment Case Study

    The Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division affirmed the denial of the request to suppress evidence. The New Jersey Supreme Court then reversed the decision and ruled that the exclusionary rule of the Fourth Amendment applies to the searches and seizures made by school officials. The case then went to the United States Supreme Court. The first thing the U.S Supreme Court did was ordered to rehear the argument about the question of whether the assistant principal violated the Fourth Amendment in T.L.O’s case. After rehearing the argument the court in a 6-3 decision written by Justice Byron R. White ruled that the search of T.L.O’s purse was reasonable under the circumstances. They stated that even though the Fourth Amendment’s protection against unreasonable searches and seizure also applied to public school officials, they may conduct reasonable searches of students with proper authority and probable…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Charles Katz Case
    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Katz Case

    First, does the right to privacy extend to public telephone booths and public places? And secondly, is a physical meddling necessary to establish a search? Since there is a question at hand over constitutional rights the Supreme Court took these matters into their own hands. “The Government's eavesdropping activities violated the privacy upon which petitioner justifiably relied while using the telephone booth, and thus constituted a "search and seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment.” (Supreme Court Cases). It is said that the government illegally convicted and charged Katz by using his own conversation as evidence against him. The Fourth Amendment governs not only the seizure of concrete items, but also carries on to the recording of oral statements and conversation and in this case conversation via telephone. The Court voted 7-1 in Katz’s favor with Justice Black in dissent. The government in arguing against Katz, made clear that the phone booth was made partly of glass, leaving Katz visible to the public. The Court rebutted saying that what Katz didn’t seek to disregard that when he stepped in the booth was not the “intruding eye-it was the uninvited ear.” On behalf of the majority, Justice Stewart wrote, “One who occupies [a telephone booth], shuts the door behind him, and pays the toll that permits him to place a call is surely entitled to assume that the words he utters into the mouthpiece will not be broadcast to the world." Every detail was extremely important in the case especially the fact that he shut the door in the booth, making private conversation okay in public areas. Justice Douglas and Brennan concurred with the same reasons whereas Justices Harlan and White concurred but with differing…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fourth Amendment Argumentative Analysis
    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page

    Fourth Amendment Argumentative Analysis

    This comment analyzes the history of the Fourth Amendment and the evolution of the private search doctrine. Specifically, it takes the reader through a history of the Fourth Amendment and the inception of the private search doctrine into how the Fourth Amendment is being upheld in today’s technology-driven world. In detail, this comment seeks to expand upon the defendant’s home presumption argument that the Sixth Circuit in United States v. Lichtenberger did not address.…

    • 74 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three Distinct Rights: The Fourth Amendment
    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page

    Three Distinct Rights: The Fourth Amendment

    The Fourth Amendment protects three distinct rights. They are liberty, property and privacy. Taking into consideration along with research and survey, I believe that each of these rights are equally important. Together they provide for a complete and well-rounded way of life. Without liberty, our lives would be limited to what the establishment would allow and therefore, what privacy could we have without the right of choice. Property would have no value without the liberty to use it as I desire.…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Open Field
    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Open Field

    Curtilage is the immediate area surrounding persons home (Hall, 2014). This area is considered part of the home and is afforded the protections of the Fourth Amendment (Hall, 2014). Open fields is a doctrine that states certain areas around ones home are not considered curtilage, and therefore these areas are not afforded the same protections under the Fourth Amendment (Hall, 2014). The U.S. Supreme Court has stated the areas considered to be open fields are areas law enforcement can encroach on without having to obtain a warrant (Hall, 2014). The U.S. Supreme Court heard the case, United States v. Dunn, and developed four factors that help decide what area are treated as curtilage and what areas are considered open fields (Hall, 2014).…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Katz v US
    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Katz v US

    III. Facts: The petitioner, Charles Katz, was charged with conducting illegal gambling operations across state lines in violation of federal law. In order to collect evidence against Katz, federal agents placed a warrantless wiretap on the public phone booth that he used to conduct these operations. The agents listened only to Katz's conversations, and only to the parts of his conversations dealing with illegal gambling transactions. At his trial, Katz sought to exclude any evidence connected with these wiretaps, arguing that the warrantless wiretapping of a public phone booth constitutes an unreasonable search of a "constitutionally protected area" in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The federal agents countered by saying that a public phone booth was not a "constitutionally protected area," therefore, they could place a wiretap on it without a warrant.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    briana
    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    briana

    Court Cases In the court case of Katz v. United States. Charles Katz, was charged with conducting illegal gambling operations across state lines in violation of federal law. In order to collect evidence against Katz, federal agents placed a warrantless wiretap on the public phone booth that he used to conduct these operations. The agents listened only to Katz's conversations, and only to the parts of his conversations dealing with illegal gambling transactions, wiretapping a public phone booth is in violation of the fourth amendment the Supreme Court stated that “4th Amendment protects the people and not certain areas against search and seizure”. Without this amendment people would have no claim over their personal privacy, or security. Any officer could enter homes and take any evidence that could be used to make an arrest or that could be used for prosecution in court.…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Papers
    • 360 Words
    • 1 Page

    Papers

    In the case of Kyllo the U.S Supreme Court held that the use of a thermal-imaging device aimed at private home from public street to detect relative amounts of heat with the home is a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Thus they required a warrant. Because the police in this case did not have a warrant, the Court reversed Kyllo's conviction for growing marijuana. In the Delta City Police Department case similar means was used without having a search…

    • 360 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    greenwood
    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    greenwood

    Justice BYRON R. WHITE, for a 6–2 Court, held that the FOURTH AMENDMENT'S prohibition againstUNREASONABLE SEARCHES and seizures does not apply to those who leave their sealed trash outside their curtilage for collection by the trash collector. In this case, an observant police-woman, suspecting Greenwood of dealing in narcotics, obtained the trash collector's cooperation and found enough incriminating EVIDENCE to establish PROBABLE CAUSE for a search of the residence. This evidence was used to convict him. The question was whether the initial WARRANTLESS SEARCH of the trash violated the Fourth Amendment. The Court ruled that those discarding their trash by placing it on the street for collection abandoned any REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY they might otherwise have. The two dissenters believed that the warrantless investigation of the trash constituted an appalling invasion of privacy.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More