Theology – Mr. Mayemba Kate Foote 12Ben - Explain the objections of Gaunilo and Kant to the ontological argument. Gaunilo and Kant both had objections to Anselms ontological argument. While Kant argued that the problem in the argument lay in it’s claim that existence is it’s predicate‚ Gaunilo argued that there must be something wrong with it even though he could not identify a specific fault. Kant argued that existence cannot be a predicate because it does
Premium Metaphysics Ontology Existence
Archbishop of Cantebury (1033-1109)‚ is the originator of the ontological argument‚ which he describes in the Proslogium as follows: [Even a] fool‚ when he hears of … a being than which nothing greater can be conceived … understands what he hears‚ and what he understands is in his understanding.… And assuredly that‚ than which nothing greater can be conceived‚ St. Anselm‚ Archbishop of Cantebury (1033-1109)‚ is the originator of the ontological argument‚ which he describes in the Proslogium as follows:
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Plato
discussed for a very long time are the ontological and cosmological arguments. Each was proposed in the period of the high middle ages by members of the Roman Catholic Church. They each have been used extensively by many since their introduction. However‚ one of the arguments is superior ant that is the ontological argument. The Ontological argument is the stronger of the two due to the fact that it is based on pure logic and reasoning. The major premise of the Ontological argument is about
Premium Cosmological argument Ontology Existence
Anselm’s ontological argument is a priori proof of God’s existence. Anselm begins his argument with ideas that do not depend on experience and progress to a throughly logical explanation that God necessarily exists. Anselm’s goal is to prove to the "fool" that God has to exist. He says that anyone who has an understanding of the existence of God can and logically has to believe that God really does exist. Anselm starts off with a statement that is slightly simple and straight forward;
Premium Ontology Metaphysics Existence
What is an ontological argument? What is the distinguishing feature of St. Anselm’s theism that makes it ontological? An ontological argument for the existence of God attempts the method of a priori proof‚ which uses intuition and reason alone. 5. What is a cosmological argument? Explain St. Aquinas’ argument from design
Premium Philosophy Religion Metaphysics
The ontological argument proposed by Anselm‚ in Anselm’s Proslogion is a priori argument‚ meaning it does not start from a feature of the world but rather a definition of God. It seeks to move from a definition of god to the reality of god by reasoning. The first line in Anselms ontological argument is “the fool says in his heart there is no god”‚ from this Anselm can deduce that the fool has an understanding of what god is .The fool has to admit that god is that than which nothing greater can
Premium Existence Ontology God
One of the main arguments against torture is that it is immoral. There are plenty of arguments to whether torture should be legalized or not. Alan Dershowitz believes that torture should be legalized for life saving events. This may be true; however‚ Phillip Heymann believes that legalizing torture would begin a slippery slope towards widespread use of torture in less extreme situations‚ making torture become a common place. After considering both sides to the debate I agree with . I would be skeptical
Premium
Torture is “the act of inflicting excruciating pain‚ as punishment or revenge‚ as a means of getting a confession or information‚ or for sheer cruelty” (Dictionary.com). It is thought that torture is used to get information that may save lives. In “September 17‚ 2001 - President George W. Bush sign[ed] a secret memo authorizing the CIA to detain suspected terrorists” (“CIA Torture Report Fast Facts”). What innocent citizens don’t know‚ is that torture is sometimes used wrongly and for revenge instead
Premium Torture George W. Bush Central Intelligence Agency
This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply‚ this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances‚ a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary‚ torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”
Premium Morality Human rights Torture
I do not believe in torture and consider it something barbaric and inhuman. Therefore I would say that torture is never acceptable under any circumstances‚ and regardless of what the consequences might be. Torture and civilization do not mix because the latter highly emphasizes the value of human beings as it is something intrinsic. Democracy also does not mix with torture because democratic societies believe in human rights and equality. My point is that the end does not justify the means when it
Premium Human Morality Torture