Preview

Negative Effects Of Torture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
715 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Negative Effects Of Torture
Torture is “the act of inflicting excruciating pain, as punishment or revenge, as a means of getting a confession or information, or for sheer cruelty” (Dictionary.com). It is thought that torture is used to get information that may save lives. In “September 17, 2001 - President George W. Bush sign[ed] a secret memo authorizing the CIA to detain suspected terrorists” (“CIA Torture Report Fast Facts”). What innocent citizens don’t know, is that torture is sometimes used wrongly and for revenge instead of information gathering, and rarely is accurate information gathered. Additionally, torture goes against Eighth Amendment which is a right that all American citizens and foreigners have. Even with all the negative effects of torture and the fact …show more content…
Torture opposes the Eighth Amendment, which states that “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, or cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (U.S. Const. amend. VIII). Ranging from starvation to waterboarding to humiliation, torture is indeed a cruel and unusual punishment, which proves that it disobeys a law that can ever be taken away from American citizens and even foreigners. To add on, these cruel punishments are not only breaking the law, but it isn’t always used for a good cause. For an example, “abuse at Abu Ghraib was about humiliation and punishment, not information gathering. In 2004, the Washington Post reported MPs involved in the abuse ‘said detainees were beaten and sexually humiliated as punishment or for fun’” (Frick). This further proves that torture is a cruel and unusual punishment, and that not only is torture a crime for breaking the Eighth Amendment, but more crimes are being committed in the process as well. With this being said, it is obvious that torture should not even be used, because it violates the …show more content…
When torture was used, “The Senate Select Intelligence Committee spent more than five years analyzing approximately 6.3 million pages of documents, at a cost of $40 million” and even more on interrogators (“CIA Torture Report Fast Facts”). However all this money was wasted, because torture is ineffective and it did not lead to much vital information that could save lives. And if torture is brought back to the government, more money will be spent for something that isn’t really helpful to the nation. Additionally, torture is illegal by current law so talking about bringing back torture is pointless, due to the fact that they can’t use torture unless the law changes. Ultimately, torture should not and most likely will not be brought back to the United States government, because it is ineffective and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The U.N defines torture as a way people get answers from detainees. The CIA would use harmful techniques to figure out what someone did, and how they did it (“5 Interrogation Methods”). One of the techniques used to get out answers was waterboarding. People are put on the ground or anywhere and they have a towel on their face. The prison guard would pour the water all over the other person's face to imitate drowning (“5 Interrogation Methods”). Having said this, because of the interrogation less people have been attacked and the CIA has found more…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At some point everyone has heard of torture. It could have been in a movie or on the news, but they have heard of it. In this day and age, people would like to have believed it was all behind us in the past. Then 9/11 happened, everyone’s lives were changed with one simple act of cruelty. Before 9/11 hit the U.S. in a wave of pain, panic, and anger, our viewpoints on torture would probably have been less likely that it should be allowed. The decision to torture people who are suspected of being part of terrorist groups has always been decided by the government, for the simple reason that it is required to keep us safe from harm. Some people believe that torture is cruel, unsightly and just inhumane. On the other hand there are people who see it the same way but also believe it could be necessary in extreme circumstances. We’re going to look at two different points of torture: When it is acceptable and when it is not acceptable.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Torture is illegal because it breaks the 8th Amendment of the Constitution. The Constitution states that the 8th Amendment of the Constitution states that cruel and unusual punishment is illegal . “The detainees were sexually humiliated for punishment and for fun in Guantanamo Bay” (ThinkProgress). These are not only illegal but they are hate crimes too, The US government makes the guards believe that all of the detainees are bad because they are Muslims when they are not. EIT breaks the 8th amendment so it must be abolished.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If torture is used in retaliation and as an “eye to eye” concept, then torture would be an unethical way of punishing someone (Guidebook). For this example, I would argue that torture is being used to provide the members with the realization for their actions, so torture is an unethical way of punishment. Also, torture is not a replacement for the death penalty, so it is not saving an individual’s life because in the guidebook it states that if “torture is vengeful and not being used to protect innocent lives, then it is not technically a moral reason for punishing someone” (Guidebook). Without protecting innocent lives, torture cannot be considered an ethical reason for punishing someone, so I would argue that the type of punishment that should be used is an elongated amount of jail time. Incarceration meets all the requirements for being a moral type of punishment because it doesn't cause mental harm that torture would and incarcerating the members would not be a retaliating…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States has always prided itself on being a country of freedom. A country with liberty and justice for all. How can we as a nation still pride ourselves on these virtues when we subject people to torture? Where does the line get drawn when we allow torture to be used? We look at the Constitutional rights and the Geneva Convention, as having rules which clearly frown upon the use of torture. However under the Patriot Act we have seen the use of powers under this act to allow the use of torture which contradict the Constitution and the Geneva Convention, which were intended to stop the use of torture, and this become an issue. Do we terminate the use of torture, or do we continue to use the cruel, inhumane, and degrading acts on captivated ‘terrorists’?…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Should torture be once again instituted by American interrogators? No; torture is degrading, inhumane, and futile. Torture is a violation of human rights, and prohibited in international law (“Convention”). The use of waterboarding damages the American government’s credibility. The act should never…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Annotated bibliography

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Very brief summary: The article ‘Using torture may be justified in extreme cases’ argues that torture should be allowed if it will save the life of another person or people.…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “To torture or not to torture” – the main topic in debate between Charles Krauthammer and Andrew Sullivan is whether torture should be permissible under certain circumstances or never at all. The debate of torture between Krauthammer and Sullivan began three years after the Bush administration defined “torture” in the narrowest terms – the permitted coercive, physical abuse of enemy combatants if the military necessity demands it. (317) Krauthammer discusses extreme situations that make the use of torture seem less morally unethical and almost acceptable; however, his examples are just hypothetical situations. When I weigh his scenarios against reality and think about how much torture can really affect a person’s life, Krauthammer’s make-believe stories have no weight and do not sway my opinion one bit. On the other hand, Sullivan makes a strong point that I completely agree with. We are all humans, but allowing torture to be permissible would only lead to people treating others in a manner less than any human would ever deserve.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This paper addresses one of the most abiding and heated controversies surrounding the topic of torture and morality. Put simply, this controversy concerns the issue of whether under extreme and exceptional circumstances, a government agency should be legally permitted to use torture as a means of punishment or extracting information. According to Oxford Dictionary, torture is defined as “The action of inflicting severe pain on someone as a punishment or in order to force them to do or say something”.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Torture Is Wrong

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a matter of fact, the Association for the Prevention of Torture points out, “Further, using torture ourselves allows other countries to more easily justifying using torture against our own soldiers and nationals” ("Defusing the Ticking Bomb Scenario" 845). If tormenting captured victims to get further intelligence, then our country is not doing nothing but setting a bad example for the nations around the world. Much less, more innocents might become victims of torture because of a pure excuse of the government wanting to keep the people safe. Even if any of attackers was captured and tortured for information, surely they have already had everything planned to put them to action. Innocents would die of we were to threat and torture or even kill the person captured.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Torture Is Waterboarding

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Torture is causing pain and suffering to gain information and confessions. It’s a traditional, historical, well-understood term. Waterboarding is a form of torture in which a bound, gagged prisoner is forced to breathe in water. There are several techniques but all produce the same effects, a physical sensation of drowning and a psychological sensation of panic, fear and loss of control. Calling it anything other than torture is absurd. You wouldn’t call a bank robbery a “cash gathering technique,” even if the president said it was so. There are no such things as “enhanced interrogation methods.” That is the euphemism the Bush administration used in 2002 when they were redefining torture so the president could authorize it. There is never an excuse to torture a person, not even during war. It undermines our cause, endangers our soldiers on the battlefield by encouraging reciprocity, and it breeds more enemies of the United States than coercive interrogation methods will ever allow us to capture.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As Americans, as a nation founded on the basis of fundamental human rights, and equality for all, torture is an unacceptable and inexcusable act that degrades us as a nation and as individuals. It debases us and makes us scarcely better than those we condemn. Just as a rose by any other name will smell just as sweet, torture by any other name remains just as deplorable.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After reading this article and evaluating both sides of the argument, my opinion remains the same. I disagree that torture is necessary; it is a barbaric breach of human rights. After looking at statistics, only 8% of Guantanamo detainees were Al Qaeda fighters, this is a shockingly low percentage in proportion to the 517 Guantanamo that were detained. British laws have deemed torture illegal and yet at least 6 detainees alleged that British forces were involved in the torture.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America has gone through many times as a country. Many events, like wars and 9/11, in the past have led and created the debate of using torture on terrorist and terrorism. One, out of the many events, that in the past have impacted the huge debate on torture was on September 11, 2001, a terrorist attack occurred where four planes were hijacked by terrorists and two were flown into the World Trade Center in New York Center, causing the country to become in an uproar. Defined by the Webster Dictionary, torture is “the act of causing severe physical pain as a form of punishment or as a way to force someone to do or say something,” while terrorism is “the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whereas U.S. Constitution exists in order to protect one’s rights, torture becomes merely against the law. If one is forced to be physically harmed, then he or she is defended by the Constitution. Human beings have “inescapable frailty” regarding bodily needs. However, torture hinders people’s autonomy, nudging them in the “inescapable frailty.” People lose their control, then; if one has lost his control over his body or mind, his state becomes “subhuman.”…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays