Opinion on the Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Case As the opinion delivered by Justice Stevens‚ the U.S. Supreme Court intended to answer the significant question in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue‚ Inc. (Mosley case) that “whether objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark is a requisite for relief under the 1996 Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA)”. 1 Contrary to lower courts’ holdings‚ the Supreme Court stated in a unanimous decision that it is not enough to claim
Premium Trademark Property Supreme Court of the United States
The Urdu-English Controversy in Pakistan Author(s): Tariq Rahman Source: Modern Asian Studies‚ Vol. 31‚ No. 1 (Feb.‚ 1997)‚ pp. 177-207 Published by: Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/312861 . Accessed: 02/03/2011 04:06 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR ’s Terms and Conditions of Use‚ available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR ’s Terms and Conditions of Use provides‚ in part‚ that unless you have obtained
Premium Pakistan Zulfikar Ali Bhutto
In Glenn V. Brumby Glenn claimed that Brumby “discriminated against her because of her sex‚ including her female gender identity and her failure to conform to the sex stereotypes associated with the sex Defendant perceived her to be.”(Glenn Glenn V. Brumby Case). Her second claim on Brumby “discriminated against her because for medical condition‚ GID‚” because “receiving necessary
Premium Montgomery Bus Boycott Homosexuality LGBT
Regan Montgomery Thaddeus Stevens Reflection. Thaddeus Stevens was not in favor of an easy re-entry into the Union for former Confederate states. He was in favor of punitive action against the South because he believed it was necessary to ensure justice and protect the rights of freed slaves. Stevens also thought that without consequences‚ the former Confederate states might revert to their old ways and continue to oppress the newly freed African Americans. Without violence involving punishment
Premium
Western Australian Certificate of Education Examination‚ 2010 Question Paper ENGLISH Stage 3 Time allowed for this paper Reading time before commencing work: Working time for paper: ten minutes three hours Materials required/recommended for this paper To be provided by the supervisor This Question Paper Standard Answer Book To be provided by the candidate Standard items: Special items: pens‚ pencils‚ eraser or correction fluid/tape‚ ruler‚ highlighters nil Important note to candidates
Premium The Stage Writing Copyright
Cited: Brengelmman‚ Fred. The English Language. USA: Prentice Hall Inc.‚ 1990. Copeland‚ Lewis. High School Subjects Self Taught. 4th ed. Chicago: J.G. Ferguson Publishing Company‚ Inc.‚ 1992. Cortez‚ Lilia R. English in Richer Education. Manila: Rex Printing Company Inc.‚ 1992. Dryry‚ Donald. Varieties of Language. California‚ USA:Dickerson Publishing Company‚ Inc.‚ 1992
Premium Pronoun Verb English language
29. Introduction 30. The decision of the House of Lords in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1] evinces the accuracy of Gooley’s observation that the separate legal entity doctrine was a "two-edged sword".[2] At a general level‚ it was a good decision. By establishing that corporations are separate legal entities‚ Salomon’s case endowed the company with all the requisite attributes with which to become the powerhouse of capitalism. At a particular level‚ however‚ it was a bad decision. By extending the
Premium Corporation Limited liability company
NAME: THE IMPORTANCE OF ENGLISH COURSE: British or American‚ the language is basically the same‚ and its global stature is backed up by massive English-language training programmes‚ an international business that in textbooks‚ language courses‚ tape cassettes‚ video programmes and computerized instruction — is worth hundreds of millions of pounds or dollars to the economies of the US and the UK. The English language is now one of Britain’s most reliable exports. In the ironic words of the novelist
Premium English language Oxford English Dictionary United Kingdom
movement and the achievements. The boycott began on the 1st December 1955 with Rosa Parks in Montgomery‚ Alabama‚ with Rosa Parks. She refused to give up her seat on a bus to a white man on demand. She was arrested and imprisoned for violating the law. This was the beginning of the campaign of non-violence. In protest to Parks’ arrest‚ the African American community‚ who comprised 75% of bus users in Montgomery‚ began
Premium Martin Luther King, Jr. Montgomery Bus Boycott Rosa Parks
English Next Why global English may mean the end of ‘English as a Foreign Language’ David Graddol The moral rights of the author have been asserted. The opinions expressed in this book are not necessarily those of the British Council. Designed and produced by The English Company (UK) Ltd www.english.co.uk Cover design by Intro (Last minor revision Jan 2007) © British Council 2006 The United Kingdom’s international organisation for educational opportunities and cultural relations. We
Free English language