of an anticipatory search warrant is dependent upon: a. a triggering condition. b. reasonable suspicion. c. reasonable suspicion and a triggering condition. d. witness testimony and reasonable suspicion. 2. For Fourth Amendment purposes‚ a seizure of property occurs whenever there is a(n) a. invasion of a constitutionally protected area. b. interference with a person’s possessory interests in that property. c. interference with a person’s reasonable
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
The Supreme Court has made many decisions about police conduct but very few have had the impact on all of law enforcement as that of Tennessee vs. Garner. This landmark case has set very clear lines as when an officer of the law may use deadly force on a fleeing suspect. At about 10:45 p. m. on October 3‚ 1974‚ Officers of the Memphis Police Department‚ Elton Hymon and Leslie Wright responded to a "prowler inside call" (FindLaw.com). After arriving at the scene‚ they saw a woman standing on her
Premium Tennessee v. Garner Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
MARQUETTE LAW REVIEW‚ 82(491)‚ 492-493. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1410&context=mulr Lasker‚ A. W. (2012‚ October). Supreme court: ’reasonable suspicion ’ enough for traffic stop | Illinois State Bar Association. Retrieved from http://www.isba.org/ibj/2012/10/lawpulse/supremecourtreasonablesuspicionenou New York v. Belton‚ 453 U.S. 454 (1981) Pettrey‚ J.D.‚ M. T. (2012‚ March). FBI ? The Exigent Circumstances Exception After Kentucky v. King
Premium Police Criminal law Law
Patrick O’Connor Professor Wheeler English 105.48 23 October 2007 A True American Icon Throughout the years America has had many symbolic icons that have influenced its change. In the late 20th century one man by the name of Hunter S. Thompson made a big impact on American society. Hunter S. Thompson with his writings‚ satirical humor‚ and his strong political beliefs caused changes in our society. Through his journalism he criticized society on topics from consumerism to politics. He fought
Premium Hunter S. Thompson Watergate scandal Richard Nixon
Ever since the new president‚ it wasn’t the United States that I knew of anymore. Today‚ something very shocking happened. Mr. Brown‚ my math teacher‚ searched everyone’s backpack and clothes for his stolen iPad charger. We all thought that it was ridiculous to look through our properties without even asking us. When he found the iPad charger in Sam’s backpack‚ he yelled‚ “This is mine! And I know that because mine had a “b” written on the charger‚ so does this one. Sam‚ please see me after class
Premium English-language films President of the United States United States
brought her purse to the principal‚ and the principal demanded to see her purse. Proof that T.LO. was selling drugs was found. They took it to the police and she finally committed to selling marijuana. The state of New Jersey brought charges against her. In court she argued that the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches had been violated. In juvenile court they sided with the school and then in New Jersey Supreme Court they said the search was unreasonable. The case was then taken to
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution
1. Can you (or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor) search Yourprop’s personal vehicle currently parked in the Company parking lot for digital evidence? Support your answer. a. Pursuant to the 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution‚ Mr. Yourprop and all other employees have a reasonable expectation of privacy which would prevent me and his supervisor from freely searching his vehicle. The easiest and most efficient way that would prevent questions of immiscibility in court and protect the company from legal
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Police
Privacy protections against government searches are provided by state and federal laws‚ and by the Constitution’s Fourth Amendment‚ which provides that “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers and effects‚ against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be violated.” Courts have slowly developed different frameworks as they grapple with how to apply the original intentions of the Fourth Amendment to new social circumstances. Federal courts‚ due to the slow pace
Premium Law Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States
strongest defense to this law can be found in The United States Constitution‚ in Article VI‚ section 3‚ which clearly prohibits the denial to anyone to vote based on several key points. Specifically‚ the Voting Rights act of 1965 and the 24th amendment has provided that no voting right shall be denied for failure to pay a poll or tax to the federal government. What the Republicans are trying to do clearly violates the 24th Amendment of the Constitution‚ and is therefore a strong defense against such
Free United States Constitution Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
conclusion. The case Heien v. North Carolina came about on April 29‚ 2010 when an officer started “following a suspicious vehicle‚ Sergeant Matt Darisse noticed that only one of the vehicle’s brake lights was working and pulled the driver over. While issuing a warning ticket for the broken brake light‚ Darisse became suspicious of the actions of the two occupants and their answers to his questions. Petitioner Nicholas Brady Heien‚ the car’s owner‚ gave Darisse consent to search the vehicle. Darisse
Premium Appellate court Supreme court Appeal