The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures; however‚ it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures if there is reasonable doubt. Searches are determined on two important interests. The first is the intrusion on the individual’s Fourth Amendment Rights; the second includes legitimate government interests such as national security. What constitutes a reasonable suspicion? Where must a public official draw the line? How should one address any “gray area”
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
people will not be equal and safe if the right against unreasonable search and seizure‚ freedom of speech‚ and right to privacy are altered. Americans have many rights; one of them being the right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The fourth amendment of The Bill of Rights says that people have a right to not be hassled or investigated without reason. “The right of the people to be secure in their persons‚ houses‚ papers‚ and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures‚ shall not be
Premium United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
Chiderah Onyeukwu Mr. James Jones CPSC 2910 001 30 March 2014 Ethics Book Report The text that is the basis for this class and report is “Ethics for the Information Age” by Michael J. Quinn. The book covers a variety of topics‚ including but not limited to Networked Communication‚ Intellectual Property‚ Informational Privacy‚ and Professional Ethics. Quinn discusses various pros and cons associated with each topic along with laws and ideas that either helped advance them in society or bring them
Premium United States Congress Federal government of the United States Law of the United States
purpose(s)? II. Whether the dating privilege applies to Summer. III. Whether the seizure of the packet of white powder was proper. SHORT ANSWERS I. The e-mails written by Summer and Ryan are admissible because they express the feelings and mental states of both Summer and Ryan‚ and those feelings are material to this case. In addition‚ the e-mails can be authenticated and are therefore admissible as evidence. II. The dating privilege does not apply to Summer because under both the "factor approach"
Free E-mail E-mail address Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Assignment Pretrial Process.doc Law - General Law CJA 364 Week 1 Individual Assignment Criminal Procedure Policy Paper CJA 364 Week 2 Individual Assignment Exclusionary Rule Evaluation CJA 364 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Fourth Amendment Summary CJA 364 Week 3 Individual Assignment Criminal Procedure-Probable Cause Article Summary CJA 364 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Search and Seizure Paper CJA 364 Week 4 Individual Assignment Criminal Right to Counsel
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution 21st century
re-read the story and use the highlighting tool in Word (or equivalent program) to find violations of rights protected by the U.S. Constitution and its Amendments (there will be 10). On the blanks below‚ write the number of the Amendment that has been violated and what right within that Amendment was violated. You will receive 1 point for correctly highlighting each amendment violation and 1 additional point for a correct explanation on the blanks below. It was a sunny Tuesday afternoon‚ and Johnny
Premium United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United Kingdom
History: Steiney Richards was tried and convicted of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Richards appealed the trial court’s decision‚ the Court of Appeals affirmed. Richards then appealed to the Wisconsin Supreme Court and that court affirmed the appellate court’s ruling. (201 Wis. 2d 845‚ 549 N.W.2d 218 (1996)). Richards appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court‚ certiorari was granted. Facts: After an investigation revealed substantial evidence that Steiney Richards was involved
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
– Explain each problem or error using case precedent and amendments PG 4 THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUDGE AND ASSOCIATE JUDGES: NATURE OF THE CASE This is an appeal from the verdict in a jury
Premium Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution United States Constitution Jury
Abstract Searches of fire scenes are common in operations of the fire service and important to the investigation of fire origin and cause. Fire and arson investigators need to be aware of search and seizure laws. There have been several court decisions and laws created regarding proper search and seizure procedures for fire and arson investigators. Research into these laws and court rulings will help fire and arson investigators understand what type of search warrant is required‚ if search
Premium Law Management Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
indiscriminate use of deadly force with its decision in the case of Tennessee v. Garner. In this case‚ the court ruled that the use of deadly force against apparently unarmed and non dangerous fleeing felons is an illegal seizure of their person under the Fourth Amendment. “Deadly force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent escape and the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious injury to the officer or others”(Tennessee v. Garner‚ 1985). The
Premium Police Supreme Court of the United States Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution