Preview

Unreasonable Searches In Schools Case Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
325 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Unreasonable Searches In Schools Case Brief
In school student rights can be limited. There are several court cases that cover these rights. Here are a couple of them.
Unreasonable Searches & Seizures-
In the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case, T.LO. and her friend were accused by a teacher for smoking in the bathroom. Her friend admitted to, but T.L.O kept denying it. The teacher brought her purse to the principal, and the principal demanded to see her purse. Proof that T.LO. was selling drugs was found. They took it to the police and she finally committed to selling marijuana. The state of New Jersey brought charges against her. In court she argued that the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches had been violated. In juvenile court they sided with the school and then in New Jersey Supreme Court they said the search was unreasonable. The case was then taken to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided that “the school had met a ‘reasonableness’ standard for for conducting such searches at school”. It was also decided that “school administrators do not need a search warrant or probable cause before conducting a search because students have a reduced expectation of privacy when in school”.
…show more content…
Des Moines Independent School District case John and Mary Beth Tinker and their friend Chris Eckhardt wore black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam. The school officials told them to take them off. When they refused they were suspended. Their parents sued the school for a violation of their First Amendment right of freedom of speech. When taken to the Supreme Court they sided with the students. The Court said that students and teachers “don’t shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate”. While students do still have the right to self expression, the school can still do what it needs to if the act disrupts classwork and the students around

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case study “The Twenty Dollar Bill” involves students and their Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that citizens are free from unreasonable search and seizure from the government. However, school administration (an extension of government) does have the power to implement searches and seizures that may be outside of the constitutional scope in order to maintain good order and discipline in the school. This is evidenced by the Supreme Court case New Jersey vs. T.L.O where the Supreme Court ruled that requiring schools to obtain warrants for searches would interfere with the swift and informal disciplinary procedures needed in schools. However, the Supreme Court also stated that there must be reasonable grounds to conduct a search and it is limited to individualized suspicion and not group searches. Students do not shed their constitutional rights when they enter school grounds.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyler Chase Harper, a high school sophomore, was sent to the principal’s office for violating the dress code. He was wearing a T-shirt which contained statements that disparaged the homosexual community. Chase filed suit in federal court claiming that the school violated his First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and religion, as well as rights protected by the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses under the federal Constitution and the California Civil Code.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case brings the question up of was T.LO's rights broken or not. The fourth amendment is the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. T.L.O is the person who sued because she felt that the contents in her bag were only found because it was searched unlawfully. In Juvenile Court it was decided that there had been no Fourth Amendment violation. T.L.O was searched without probably cause of any illegal activity. The fact that she was smoking cigarettes in school have the principle no reason to think she is dealing marijuana.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This case all started with a meeting at Christopher Echardt’s house to do a silent protest of the Vietnam war. The “Tinker kids” decided the wear two-inch-wide black armbands to school for the protest. Before the students could wear their armbands, the principals of the Des Moines School District found out about what they were planning and fearing that the armbands would provoke disturbances, they resolved that all students…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, after viewing North Fargo High School’s student handbook, Mr. Renville’s senior portrait clearly violated the school guidelines which state: “No student will knowingly possess, handle, carry, or transmit any weapon or dangerous instrument in any school building, on school grounds, in any school vehicle or at any school-sponsored activity.4” .The image Renville provided clearly violates the school guidelines and does not pass the “Tinker Test”, therefore the ruling delivered in Tinker v Des Moines independent Community School District does not apply to the supposed infringement on Renville’s freedom of speech…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bristol School Case Study

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated in Tinker v. Des Moines, “...[i]t could not be justified by a showing that the students’ activities would materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school”(Tinker v. Des Moines School District). This case justifies how important it is that the court repeatedly emphasizes the need to guarantee the absolute authority of the States and of the school officials, persistent with fundamental constitutional safeguards, to determine and control the conduct in the schools. Additionally, as expressed in the Bristol Student Handbook, “Access to the School District’s Technology is provided as a privilege and as an educational tool. In order to continue enjoying access to the Technology, each student must take responsibility for appropriate and lawful use of this privilege. Students are responsible for their behavior with the Technology just as they are in a classroom, school hallway or other School District property” (Upper Arlington Schools Students’ Handbook…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tinker vs. Des Moine

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Before Tinker v. Des Moines the opinions students could and couldn’t voice was decided on by the schools. This changed when three students, John Tinker, Mary Beth Tinker and, Christopher Eckhardt decided to voice their opinions on the Vietnam War by wearing black arm bands (“Tinker V. Des Moines”1). The School system demanded the students to take off their arm bands or they would be suspended. The students refused to take them off didn’t attend school till after their winter break (“Tinker v. Des Moines” 1). John Tinker’s father thought this was unfair that their children were singled out for wearing armbands while other students were allowed to wear other…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts In December of 1965 fifteen year old Mary Beth Tinker, sixteen year old Christopher Eckhardt, and a group of other adults and students gathered at the house of the Eckhardts’ to hold a meeting. At the meeting the group of people decided to support their truce to what happened during the Vietnam War by wearing black armbands during the holiday season. The principle of Des Monies School (the defendant) found out about the plan and held a meeting to that created a policy that any student wearing armbands would be asked to take them off, refusal to do so would result in suspension. On December 16, 1965 Mary Beth Tinker (the plaintiff) and Christopher Eckhardt wore black armbands to school, and were sent home.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    11). By the start of the protest over 2,000 American soldiers had been brought home in caskets (Collins. 270) They planned to wear black armbands from December 16th to New Year's Eve, and fast or refuse to eat on the 16th and New Year's Eve (Brannen). In total, five of the twelve students who wore armbands were suspended because they refused to remove them, as they were against a new school rule created by the board the day before the protest (Collins. 272). The school board learned about the protest through a school newspaper article that they barred from being published in hopes no one would hear of it (Collins. 271). The new rule stated that all students wearing armbands would be asked to remove them and any students who did not comply were to be suspended until they returned without the armband (Brannen). Mary, John, and Christopher were the only students to sue the school board (Rapport. 7). During the lawsuit against the school district Mary, John, and Christopher asked ICLU (Iowa Civil Liberties Union) to represent them in court (Rapport. 18). The first trial in the Des Moines Federal District Court was on July 25, 1966 (Rapport. 31). John Tinker was the first witness of the trial (Rapport. 36). When the district court dismissed the lawsuit, the federal court affirmed the district court's ruling, and only then did the tinkers and eckhardts appeal the case to the supreme court (Brannen). Finally the supreme court ruled in the student's favor with seven justices for the students and two against on February 24, 1969 (Brannen). The time it took to get the final decision from the Supreme Court was over three years, for a case that would have a lasting affect on constitutional law…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The authors also state that suspicionless searches teach students that rights do not matter. I disagree with the author's point of view on overstating the dangers of drugs in schools. I believe it is a growing concern in our public school system. How do we expect a student to concentrate in class if he is stoned all the time? I think instituting random school searches should be on a case by case basis by school district. Blankenau and Leeper's article do not raise any issues of escalating school violence. Are weapons growing concerns like drugs are? The authors surveyed responses of Nebraska High School Principles to obtain data on how effective their drug polices have been. The article in this book does not allow me to make any comments on the strengths and weaknesses of their field study because they did not go in depth of what the study…

    • 4872 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    December 1965, a group of students met at Christopher Eckhardt's home and discussed that they wanted to show support for the truce in the vietnam war. They decided they would wear armbands to school to support it, but the principles of the Des Moines school found out about their plan. A new rule in school was passed. That all students wearing any armband would be asked to remove it, and if they refused, they would be suspended. On the 16th of December, Mary Beth Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt both wore armbands to school, were asked to remove the armbands, and when they refused, they were send home. The next day, John Tinker had the same situation and and resulted the same way. In response to the suspension, the students sued the school district…

    • 209 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Charles Katz

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    New Jersey v. TLO, 469 U.S. 325 (1985), student bag was search and the Fourth Amendment did not apply to her even though it was her personal bag and expectation of privacy was high but due to her being on public property she lost her right to privacy. She was prosecuted but he was able to get his evidence…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Testing Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another case that addresses drug testing is Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette Parish (1998). In this case we are looking at the Fourth Amendment rights of employees. Aubrey was a custodian at an elementary school. In December 1992 the board adopted an Employee Drug Testing Policy stating all "safety sensitive" employees are subject to random selection and drug testing each year. In August of 1993, Aubrey attended and in-service where the y policy was dispersed and reviewed. On September 28, 1994, Aubrey and fourteen other employees undergo drug testing through urinalysis screening. Aubrey tested positive for a chemical that is known to be found in marijuana. In lieu of termination, the Board recommended that Aubrey attend a substance abuse program.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    April 2002, police in Ontario, Canada showed up at a high school, without a warrant to search for drugs in students backpacks. When the backpacks were searched, drug-sniffing dogs did in fact find drugs. However, many people felt that the search was unjustified, mainly because the police did not have a search warrant. The Canadian Supreme Court reviewed the case, and in 2008, they ruled that the random search of the Ontario school was unconstitutional…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Cruman Case Study

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When an unlawful search and seizure was conducted against Cruman, his Fourth Amendment rights were violated. Peter Cruman, a high school student, was accused of being involved in a Facebook group whose goal was to traffic Marijuana on school grounds. An anonymous tip was given to the principal and because of the information received, Cruman was questioned in the principal's office for 2 1/2 hours, until he agreed to sign into his Facebook account on the Principals computer. Once Cruman allowed the principal access to his Facebook account, Crumans Fourth Amendment rights, which protect people from unlawful search and seizures, were not violated because the search was not unreasonable. A unreasonable search is defined as evidence found in a search…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays