Lopez V. Orosa‚ Jr. and Plaza Theatre Inc. G.R. No. L-10817-18 Facts: Enrique Lopez‚ doing business under the trade name of Lopez-Castillo Sawmill‚ was invited by Vicente Orosa‚ Jr. to make an investment in the theatre business namely Plaza Theatre Inc. Lopez expressed his unwillingness to invest‚ however agreed to supply lumber necessary for the construction of the theatre with the assurance that Orosa would be personally liable for any account that the said construction might incur. Lopez was
Free Property Real estate Legal terms
ADDITIONAL BATCH 7 (SORRY GUYS) 1377/FIELDMAN vs SONGCO/CBR FACTS: Federico Songco of Floridablanca‚ Pampanga‚ a man of scant education being only a first grader ...‚ owned a private jeepney for the year 1960. On September 15‚ 1960‚ he was induced by Fieldmen’s Insurance Company Pampanga agent Benjamin Sambat to apply for a Common Carrier’s Liability Insurance Policy covering his motor vehicle ... Upon paying an annual premium of P16.50‚ defendant Fieldmen’s Insurance Company‚ Inc. issued on September
Premium Insurance Liability insurance
n response to customer and working group requests‚ ATPCO will implement changes to Appendix A of the Negotiated Fares (Category 35) Ticketing and Reporting Data Application document on 11 June 2017. The changes will clarify the automated ticketing options for combinations of fares where certain ticketing information from carrier data fields might be reported differently in standard industry processes. Background The Negotiated Fares (Category 35) Ticketing and Reporting Data Application document
Premium Airline Financial statements Balance sheet
was a lab assistant at her old college and raised the funds to go to graduate school. Daly finished her master’s degree and then‚ in 1944‚ enrolled at Columbia University as a doctoral student. At school‚ Daly studied how the body’s chemicals help digest food. She finished her
Premium Marie Curie School Bachelor's degree
DOCTRINE: Press freedom may be identified with the liberty to discuss publicly and truthfully any matter of public concern without censorship or punishment. The general principle is that freedom of expression is the rule and restrictions the exemption. The power to exercise prior restraint is not to be presumed‚ rather the presumption is against its validity. FACTS: * The principal petitioner is Jose Antonio U. Gonzalez‚ President of the Malaya Films. * The respondent is the Board
Premium Freedom of speech Censorship
KATE FITZPATRICK YEAR TWELVE BIOLOGY TERM ONE _(www.happycow.net)_ "TO TEST THE EFFECTS OF ANTACIDS ON PEPSIN’S ABILITY TO DIGEST PROTEIN." _CONTENTS_ 1.0 Abstract Pg 2.0 Introduction · 2.1 Aim · 2.2 Background Information · 2.3 Hypothesis PG · Pg · Pg · pg 3.0 MATERIALS · 3.1 Equipment · 3.2 Chemicals PG · Pg · Pg 4.0 METHOD · 4.1 Variables · 4.2 Procedure PG · Pg · Pg 5.0 RESULTS · 5.1 Sample calculation · 5.2 Tables · 5.3 Graphs · 5.4 Photos PG · Pg · Pg · Pg
Premium Hydrochloric acid PH Gastric acid
Rick Richards‚ et ux. v. Commissioner Facts: The petitioners‚ Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards‚ Issues: 1. Whether petitioner (both Mr. Richards and Mrs. Richards) conducted their writing or acting activities with the objective of making a profit within the meaning of §186? 2. Whether petitioners have substantiated the ordinary and necessary business expense of these activities? 3. Whether petitioners are entitled to carry forward a net operating loss from a prior tax year 4. Whether petitioners
Premium Law Legal terms Civil procedure
SESE‚ petitioners‚ vs. FIDEL V. RAMOS‚ MAJ. GEN. RENATO DE VILLA‚ BRIG. GEN. RAMON MONTANO‚ BRIG. GEN. ALEXANDER AGUIRRE‚ respondents. G.R. Nos. 84581-82 October 3‚ 1991 AMELIA ROQUE and WILFREDO BUENAOBRA‚ petitioners‚ vs. GEN. RENATO DE VILLA and GEN‚ RAMON MONTANO‚ respondents. G.R. Nos. 84583-84 October 3‚ 1991 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS OF ATTY. DOMINGO T. ANONUEVO and RAMON CASIPLE: DOMINGO T. ANONUEVO and RAMON CASIPLE‚ petitioners‚ vs. HON. FIDEL V. RAMOS
Premium 1988 Arrest Arrest warrant
Pearsall v. Alexander This case involves a consideration which is the inducement to make a contract enforceable. Pearsall and Alexander had an agreement to share to proceeds. But when Alexander had a $20‚000 winning ticket‚ he refused to give Pearsall anything‚ which led Pearsall to sue Alexander for a breach of an agreement. Court ruled in favor of Pearsall‚ and Alexander must share the winnings enforced by valid agreement. I think Court was right on the decision based on a fact that they always
Premium Law Contract United States
father and his two brothers killed by the settlers‚ both Toussaint and Tecumseh sought fairness and harmony among different races. Both are considered as brilliant political and military leaders. Toussaint’s goal was to abolish slavery and let Saint-Domingo be acceptable to different races whereas Tecumseh’s goal was to establish a strong confederation with all Indian tribes of the time to stand against the United States Government. Toussaint’s goal was partly successful due to the eventual abolition
Premium