Kurt Lieberknecht The similarities and difference between inductive and deductive arguments. The best way to describe the similarities and difference between inductive and deductive arguments‚ it would be best if the term "argument" had a definition. Everyday people have arguments. For these everyday conversations "argument" means "dispute". In this Logic class an argument consists of claims or statements followed by a final claim. The statements that articulates the reason for agreement of the
Premium Logic Argument
OPPOSITION BETWEEN DEDUCTIVE AND INDUCTIVE TECHNIQUES Students have different learning skills and capacities for getting to know about shown and told knowledge. To teach something effectively ‚ we have many techniques used while educating. So‚ during the teaching process teachers use different methods to school effectively. Two of them are deductive and inductive techniqe. Both of them have adventages but they are completely different from each other with the dominant people‚ flowing of information
Free Education Teacher
Deductive versus Inductive When presenting a logical argument the process of supporting the conclusion comes from the premises provided. Therefore‚ to stand up and present his or her beliefs‚ then will need a form of logical‚ deductive‚ and inductive reasoning to establish your argument. In the approach of a valid argument‚ there are seven rules of deductive inference and they are Modus Ponens‚ Modus Tollens‚ Hypothetical Syllogism‚ Disjunctive Syllogism‚ Conjunction‚ Simplification
Premium Logic
Mill ’s Inductive reasoning Method of Agreement Mill ’s method of agreement identifies a cause of an event in terms of its sufficient condition. When using this method‚ one searches for a single factor that is common to multiple situations in which the same event occurred. Mill says that‚ when two or more occurrences of the event under investigation have only one condition in common‚ then that condition is the cause of the event. (Mill‚ 2002) More simply stated‚ Mill ’s method of agreement
Premium Reasoning Inductive reasoning Logic
specific‚ logical conclusion”. • Inductive “refers to reasoning that takes specific information and makes a broader generalization that is considered probable‚ allowing for the fact that the conclusion may not be accurate. 2. Elaborate In other words deductive reasoning works from more general to the more specifics. Start with the theory then we narrow it down to more specific hypothesis that we can test. Inductive reasoning works the opposite. Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations
Premium Scientific method Deductive reasoning Reasoning
deductive argument that is valid but not sound. Then‚ construct a valid deductive argument that is sound. Be sure to put the argument in premise-conclusion form. Discussion 2 Inductive Language Construct an inductive argument for a specific conclusion. Then‚ explain what you might do to make this inductive argument stronger‚ either by revising the premises or by revising the conclusion. Week 1 Discussion 1 Consider an argument you have recently had with a friend‚ family member‚ manager
Premium Logic Argument Inductive reasoning
1. I see many differences from a deductive approach to the research: the fact itself that this research is qualitative‚ often lead to implement the “opposite” approach‚ the inductive one. Evidence of this are various and enough clear: - to go there on the field is not really a prerogative of the deductive approach: instead‚ what usually happens is that many quantitative data are gathered‚ with strongly structured and often impersonal methods. So‚ what happens in the case we’re dealing with is clearly
Free Scientific method
Provide an example in which you can use deductive reasoning to draw a conclusion. State the axioms or premises used to reach the conclusion. Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game that she will not be able to cheer at the game. Karen misses practice on Tuesday‚ the day before the game. Karen was not allowed to cheer at Wednesday’s game. Deductive Reasoning: (Premises) Fact: Karen knows if she misses cheerleading practice the day before a game she will not
Premium Logic Reasoning Inductive reasoning
of reasoning: inductive‚ deductive and the combination of both called inductive/deductive (Walliman & Baiche‚ 2001). Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Inductive Reasoning Inductive reasoning is one method of reasoning that researchers use. It is based on making a conclusion or generalization based on a limited number of observations. Thus‚ it produces from the specific to the general. All research that makes inference or generalizations about the results of a study uses inductive reasoning (Berg
Premium Logic Scientific method Deductive reasoning
discuss grammar teaching. This chapter includes 5 titles. The first one is: A) Introducing Grammar This part of the chapter gives us examples and principles on how to introduce a grammatical function or a grammatical structure. Examples given here are actually based on inductive methods of grammar teaching. First I want to give you a brief comparison of inductive and traditional methods of grammar teaching. Traditional Method: 1- It defines rules and exceptions at the first place explicitly.
Premium Grammar Education Learning