English
English Language and Linguistics 16.2: 261–280. C Cambridge University Press 2012 doi:10.1017/S1360674312000056 A bit of this and a bit of that: on social identification in Early and Late Modern English letters
MINNA NEVALA
University of Helsinki
(Received 10 December 2011; revised 29 February 2012)
This article deals with the use of deictic pronouns this/these and that/those as demonstrative determiners in person-referential terms in Early and Late Modern English personal letters. The material for the study comes from the Corpus of Early English
Correspondence and its Extension. The data chosen for this study cover personal correspondence between 1600 and 1800. The main purpose of the study is to show the link between the use of such demonstratives and what e.g. Tajfel & Turner (1979; also
Hogg & Abrams 1988) call social identification. Since previous research has shown that the use of person reference in Present-Day English is biased towards group distinction, linking positive characteristics to members of one’s in-group and distancing people in the out-group with negative reference, it is probable that this was the case in historical language use as well.
The study shows that most of the referents in the letter writers’, and in many cases also in the recipients’, in-group are indexed with positive descriptions and reference terms in positive contexts, whereas identifiable out-group referents mostly receive negative descriptions. The negatively, positively and neutrally evaluative functions were found to be central during both centuries. The neutral function is more prevalent than the others in the seventeenth century, but the negative and positive gain more emphasis in the eighteenth century. This shows that when both pronouns increasingly started to appear as connotative demonstrative determiners, their use as mere indexicals decreased. Overall, we can conclude that although the historical use of demonstrative pronouns as determiners
MINNA NEVALA
University of Helsinki
(Received 10 December 2011; revised 29 February 2012)
This article deals with the use of deictic pronouns this/these and that/those as demonstrative determiners in person-referential terms in Early and Late Modern English personal letters. The material for the study comes from the Corpus of Early English
Correspondence and its Extension. The data chosen for this study cover personal correspondence between 1600 and 1800. The main purpose of the study is to show the link between the use of such demonstratives and what e.g. Tajfel & Turner (1979; also
Hogg & Abrams 1988) call social identification. Since previous research has shown that the use of person reference in Present-Day English is biased towards group distinction, linking positive characteristics to members of one’s in-group and distancing people in the out-group with negative reference, it is probable that this was the case in historical language use as well.
The study shows that most of the referents in the letter writers’, and in many cases also in the recipients’, in-group are indexed with positive descriptions and reference terms in positive contexts, whereas identifiable out-group referents mostly receive negative descriptions. The negatively, positively and neutrally evaluative functions were found to be central during both centuries. The neutral function is more prevalent than the others in the seventeenth century, but the negative and positive gain more emphasis in the eighteenth century. This shows that when both pronouns increasingly started to appear as connotative demonstrative determiners, their use as mere indexicals decreased. Overall, we can conclude that although the historical use of demonstrative pronouns as determiners
References: Clark, Herbert H. & Adrian Bangerter. 2004. Changing ideas about reference. In Iva A. Noveck & Dan Sperber (eds.), Experimental pragmatics, 25–49 Clark, Herbert H. & Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. Definite descriptions and mutual knowledge. Clark, Herbert H. & Gregory L. Murphy. 1982. Audience design in meaning and reference. In Jean-François Le Ny & Walter Kintsch (eds.), Language and comprehension, 287–99. Enfield, N. J. & Tanya Stivers (eds.). 2007. Person reference in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Gernsbacher, Morton A. & Suzanne Shroyer. 1989. The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives Hanks, William F. 1992. The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, Hogg, Michael A. 2005. Uncertainty, social identity and ideology. In Shane R. Thye & Edward J Hogg, Michael A. & Dominic Abrams. 1988. Social identifications. London: Routledge. Horton, William S. & Richard J. Gerrig. 2002. Speakers’ experiences and audience design: Knowing when and knowing how to adjust utterances to addressees Jenkins, Richard. 2004. Social identity. London: Routledge. Mühlhäusler, Peter & Rom Harré. 1990. Pronouns and people: The linguistic construction of social and personal identity Nevala, Minna. 2004. Address in early English correspondence: Its forms and socio-pragmatic functions Nevala, Minna. 2009. Altering distance and defining authority: Person reference in Late Modern English Perdue, Charles W. et al. 1990. Us and them: Social categorization and the process of intergroup bias Rickford, John R. & Faye McNair-Knox. 1994. Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Some practices for referring to persons in talk-in-interaction: A partial sketch of a systematics Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Categories in action: Person-reference and membership categorization Smith, Sara W. & Andreas H. Jucker. 1998. Interactive aspects of reference assignment in conversations Stivers, Tanya. 2007. Alternative recognitionals in person reference. Enfield & Stivers (eds.), 73–96. Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield & Stephen C. Levinson. 2007. Person reference in interaction. In Enfield & Stivers (eds.), 1–20. Tajfel, Henry & John C. Turner. 1979. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In William G van Dijk, Teun A. 2009. Society and discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wilson, Andrew J. & David Zeitlyn. 1995. The distribution of person-referring expressions in natural conversation