Inductive and Deductive Reasoning A valid argument is made to address a specific problem by offering a position and proving reasons to support that position. A valid argument is based on two key components‚ one or more premise and conclusion. A premise is fact and/or opinion and must be proven to be true or false. And a conclusion is the final statement of the position one is taking on an issue or question. In deductive reasoning‚ if the fact is true the conclusion must be true because the conclusion
Premium
Arguments from religious experience are never convincing. When people say that they have experienced God or the divine in some way; they are not saying that it ‘seemed like’ God but was something else. The issue for many philosophers is: are religious experiences veridical? By this is meant can we actually demonstrate that the religious experiences of people are what they seem to be‚ i.e. experiences of God‚ rather than delusions‚ products of the mind or of some other source such as LSD? Can
Free God Religion Philosophy of religion
Logical Consistency and Possibility Logic is basically a study of the consistency of beliefs whereas belief is part of a psychological state in which a person thinks‚ is under impression‚ and believes that the universe has some property. A set of statements is logically consistent when it involves no contradictions. Logical consistency is an essential element for good reasoning because logic gives the correct conclusion as long as you have all the necessary premises correct. You can document and/or
Premium Logic Truth Epistemology
Accept your reality or die denying it In life you won’t always get what you want maybe because you’re not a certain way. However‚ that doesn’t mean you have to change because‚ your reality is that you’re different; you’re not like everyone. So‚ why deny who you are? Why try to get other’s acceptance and want something that is not you? In the play “Ghostgirl” by Tonya Hurley‚ Charlotte was being rejected and even worst she was being ignored. She tried to be someone
Premium 2007 singles Meaning of life Death
CRITICAL THINKING PSU LOGICAL FALLACIES Ad hominem or ATTACKING THE PERSON. Attacking the arguer rather than his/her argument. Example: John’s objections to capital punishment carry no weight since he is a convicted felon. Note: Saying something negative about someone is not automatically ad hominem. If a person (politician for example) is the issue‚ then it is not a fallacy to criticize him/her. Ad ignorantium or APPEAL TO IGNORANCE. Arguing on the basis of what is not known and cannot be
Premium Logic Logical fallacies Fallacy
Analyse the reasoning of the ontological argument as presented by Anselm‚ and explain its purpose. The ontological argument is A priori argument for the existence of God. St Anselm is the name most firmly associated with the origins of the ontological argument and he was an 11 century writer and the Archbishop of Canterbury. The argument has the form of a deductive proof and it an analytical argument. He wrote two treatises (the Monologion and Proslogion) which became the foundation of the Ontological
Premium Logic Ontological argument Ontology
The Nature of Reasoning What is Reasoning? a mental act whereby starting with several judgments which we relate to one another. the process which uses arguments‚ statements‚ premises and axioms to define weather a statement is true or false‚ resulting in a logical or illogical reasoning. the process of using a rational‚ systematic series of steps based on sound mathematical procedures and given statements to arrive at a conclusion. the cognitive skills with which we reach
Free Logic Inductive reasoning Reasoning
Logical Fallacies Defined Abstract Fallacies can be viewed as a mistake or error. There are many different fallacies with different meanings for each. The following paper will discuss 9 logical fallacies. The paper will also include definitions for each of the 9 fallacies as well as examples of being applied to real life scenarios. Logical Fallacies defined Everyone has gotten into an argument with someone once or twice in their lifetime. Some people have mastered their skills in
Premium Argument Fallacy Critical thinking
How convincing is the Kalam argument as proof of the existence of Allah The first premise is relatively uncontroversial‚ and is rooted in the metaphysical principle that out of nothing‚ nothing comes. The denial of the first premise‚ although strictly logically possible‚ is metaphysically unactualizable. By definition‚ nothing has no potentialities. Thus‚ it is impossible for something to arise out of nothing‚ for how can its existence be actualized if the potential is not there? The truth of the
Premium Cosmological argument Universe Existence
Jarboe I February 8‚ 2011 Logical Fallacies Before we can understand what a logical fallacy is‚ we establish some common background information for the purposes of accurate communication. There are two types of reasoning‚ inductive and deductive. The primary difference between the two is that inductive reasoning automatically allows for an appeal to probability‚ the assumption that what could happen will happen‚ while deductive reasoning considers this a logical fallacy. Thus for the purposes
Free Fallacy Critical thinking Deductive reasoning