IRAC Example 2: Hilift Pty Ltd (Hilift) owns an industrial crane. Hilift employs two crane operators‚ Elwyn and Osman‚ who each work 4 hour shifts. In May 2008 the owner/builder of a new apartment block hires Hilift’s crane and operators for two weeks to lift building materials to the upper floors of their building. At the end of the first shift on the 10 May‚ Elwyn notifies the manager of Hilift that the crane is not performing properly and that it needs looking at. The manager contacts the
Premium Tort Tort law Duty of care
Introduction: In Rebecca & ‘Zorba’s’ Restaurant case‚ the main issue is whether negligence exists of the defendant? There are three prerequisites must be present before the tort of negligence can arise: a duty of care must be owed by one person to another; there must be a breach of that duty of care; and damage must have been suffered as a result of the breach of duty. (FoBL‚ 2005‚ p70) In addition‚ another element must be satisfied to prove negligence is the causation. This essay will analysis
Premium Management Marketing German language
Week 3 IRAC Assignment Micah Flores LAW/421 January 7‚ 2014 Dr. Mark L. Pugatch‚ BS‚ MBA‚ JD Week 3 IRAC Assignment Issue: Has there been a violation of Li’s Constitutional rights? Have there been any tort offenses committed? Whom may Li/Li’s parents file an action against in order to achieve a deep pockets recovery? Rules: Li Intentional infliction of emotional distress False imprisonment Negligence Li’s Parents Respondeat Superior Scienter Mr. Billups Assumption of risk
Premium Tort law
IRAC Assignment Summary Iggy spent too much time drinking beer and playing darts‚ and result in spending too little time at the library studying. His parents want to know his Fall 2011 grades‚ and concern about whether stop supporting Iggy money. Issue The issue here is whether Iggy’s parents are entitled to the information strictly related to his grades. Rules According to FERPA: Once a student reaches 18 years of age or attends a postsecondary institution‚ he or she becomes an “eligible
Premium Personally identifiable information Higher education Education
IRAC/CRAC What is it? • Issue‚ Rule‚ Analysis‚ Conclusion OR Conclusion‚ Rule‚ Analysis‚ Conclusion • Method for organizing legal analysis so that the reader can follow your argument • Especially helpful in writing exams (IRAC) and legal memos (CRAC). How to do it? As an example‚ we will look at whether someone can sue for battery as a result of inhaling second-hand smoke. The issue we will look at is whether there is contact‚ which is required for a battery claim. Issue
Premium Common law Prima facie
Ami Patel Blaw 3400 (Honors‚ D02‚ T‚ R 2:40) IRAC Assignment #2 July 27‚2017 Morse v. Frederick‚ 551 U.S. 393 (2007) Facts: On January 2 ‚2002 students and staffs at Juneau-Douglas High school in Alaska‚ were permitted to leave class to watch the Olympic Torch Relay pass by through the school. Joseph Frederick‚ who was late for school joined his friends across the high school. When the relay began he‚ along with his friends unfurled the banner that said‚ “BONG HiTS 4 JESUS.” Principle‚ Deborah
Premium
from the Common Law. Cases such as Donoghue v Stevenson are particularly relevant. Donoghue was the case where Lord Atkin developed the ‘neighbour test’. The neighbour test asks “who should I have in contemplation as being someone that will suffer harm if I do a particular act or omit to perform a particular act”. If someone will suffer harm from my actions or inaction and if it is reasonable that I have them in contemplation then I will be liable if they suffer harm. Other cases such as Pollard
Premium Duty of care Golf Standard of care
IRAC Analysis Defendant Carl Clay entered the partially open door of a motel room around five o’clock pm with the intent to steal a television to replace his broken one. To convict Clay as guilty of burglary‚ he must meet the stipulations stated in the General Laws chapter 228 numbers one and two. The first law defines burglary as the breaking and entering of a dwelling at nighttime with the intent to commit a felony. The second law defines a felony as the theft of personal property over the
Premium Burglary Theft Law
Johnson Luu 12/25/13 Legal Brief Case Case Name: Canadian Odeon Theatres Ltd. v. Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission and Huck Facts: Michael Huck who is on a wheelchair was denied from Odeon theatre that he cannot sit where he wants to sit due to the fact that he is on a wheelchair. He was discriminated by the movie theatres because the only place he can watch the movie is in the first row sits and he was also too close to the screen which interfered with his view and his enjoyment
Premium Disability Wheelchair Law
Case Brief LAW/531 October 26‚ 2011 Facts In the case Zehmer v. Lucy‚ Zehmer created an agreement that Lucy would sell his farm for 50‚000 dollars. While at the bar drinking Zehmer had his wife sign the contract. Lucy tried to close the deal with a five dollar deposit and Zehmer refused it stating the contract was a joke. Lucy is suing Zehmer for breach of contract. Issues Is the contract between Zehmer and Lucy valid
Premium Contract