and second judge of the Domestic Relations Court were very consistent in terms of probability of appeal and probability of reversal. The third and fourth judges ranked the same all the way across the board. All of the judges had many cases but overall I think that the Common Pleas Court is the court that makes the most mistakes. I think this because they basically had the same amount of cases as the other courts did but had many more appeals. i. INTRODUCTION Hamilton County judges try thousands
Premium Court Appeal United States
Drake & Sweeney was responsible for the eviction. Michael asked a lawyer‚ at his firm‚ if he could see the file about the eviction but the lawyer refused. Michael started helping Mordecai Green‚ a lawyer for the homeless‚ and soon Michael left Drake & Sweeny and became a laywer for the homeless‚ a street laywer. But just before he officially left
Premium English-language films Character Erin Brockovich
Methodology Paper Using Narrative Criticism to Interpret the Book of Judges The Book of Judges as a Narrative Generations of scholars have admired and studied the “high degree of artistic composition” in the Hebrew Bible (Polzin 11). These have been made possible by the narrator’s in-depth writing styles present in the brief nature of their respective works. Though there is no dispute on the admiration of Hebrew Bible’s artistry‚ many scholars disagree on the methodology that should be
Premium Bible
This was followed in Knuller v DPP [1973] AC 435 (Case summary). In order for the doctrine of judicial precedent to work‚ it is necessary to be able to determine what a point of law is. In the course of delivering a judgment‚ the judge will set out their reasons for reaching a decision. The reasons which are necessary for them to reach their decision amount to the ratio decidendi of the case. The ratio decidendi forms the legal principle which is a binding precedent meaning it must
Premium Stare decisis Case law Ratio decidendi
Hamilton begins by highlighting the common misunderstanding that mythology depicts the blissful state of man in his original harmony with nature. On the contrary‚ Hamilton notes‚ the lives of ancient people were not romantic and beautiful‚ but full of hardship‚ disease‚ and violence. For Hamilton‚ the Greek myths are remarkable in that they show how far the Greeks‚ an ancient civilization‚ had advanced beyond a primitive state of savagery and brutality. By the time Homer wrote his epic‚ the Iliad
Premium Religion Greek mythology God
CASE # 1 – HAMILTON POWER TOOLS CORPORATION (abbreviated) (read this brief case and attempt all questions at end – original thinking backed by logical and creative use of marketing and business related concepts learnt in classrooms and drawn from real world success/failure situations is expected) On July 13th ‚ 1978‚ Mr Campagna‚ the marketing manager for Hamilton Tools‚ was anxiously awaiting his meeting with the marketing research firm. He felt the findings from the marketing research would change
Premium Marketing
The judge is always right. What court system is better: adversarial or inquisitorial? It is‚ indeed‚ a very good question. Most of the countries in the world use inquisitorial court system; Others‚ USA for example‚ use adversarial system. Both are great but personally I think that inquisitorial court system is better. It over goes the adversarial court system because it actually relies on true facts and witnesses rather than victims words and lawyers. As stated above the court system in the
Free Judge Jury
example than Wes Anderson‚ he is one of the best examples of a modern auteur‚ with a whimsical visual style all his own and narrative tendencies that remain consistent across his body of work. Chances are that if you know of Anderson and his past films‚ you can spot whether a movie is directed by him within five seconds of watching one his works or viewing a trailer for an upcoming film. With a distinct color palette that links everything from a the production design to the outfits‚ Anderson adheres to
Premium Film Film director Film editing
predecessor‚ I wouldn’t blame you if you simply dismissed the newest iteration of Judge Dredd as a forgettable‚ generic action feature‚ or simply a disposable reboot. When hearing about this movie‚ after being informed of the atrocity that came before it seventeen years prior‚ I was one of these individuals who fell into this category. Hearing of the praise this film has received however‚ convinced me to give the world of Judge Dredd a try. I ended up‚ however‚ being very surprised after watching this film
Premium Judge
A good judge is someone whom upholds justice and abides the law‚ while taking in the interests and opinions of the people. He should be selected through state judicial elections‚ where citizens have the final say based purely on factors such as popularity‚ qualifications and character. After all‚ we are the ones who elected the president‚ just because he portrays best the way we view ideology‚ ethics and values. Furthermore‚ more than 95 percent of the nation’s legal cases are decided by state or
Premium Judge Law Court