Preview

A Good Judge

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Good Judge
A good judge is someone whom upholds justice and abides the law, while taking in the interests and opinions of the people. He should be selected through state judicial elections, where citizens have the final say based purely on factors such as popularity, qualifications and character. After all, we are the ones who elected the president, just because he portrays best the way we view ideology, ethics and values. Furthermore, more than 95 percent of the nation’s legal cases are decided by state or local courts. (Patterson 497). This involves most cases, from criminal law (from shoplifting to murder) to civil law, which are the primary causes of danger to society.(Patterson 497) Consequently, if the judge turns out bad, citizens have only themselves to blame.
In California, only superior court judges are elected. Supreme Court and Court of Appeal justices are nominated by the Governor, confirmed by the California Commission on Judicial Appointments, and then must be retained by voters in the next general election, and once again every twelve years, if they are to remain on the bench.(Debate: Election_of_judges) Superior Court judges serve six-year terms; Supreme Court and Court of Appeal justices serve 12-year terms. (Debate:_Election_of_judges) Unfortunately, people have very little say when it comes to the elections; this is because candidates have already been chosen even before the election has taken place. As corruption prevails, to abide people from higher authorities, these elections are not proper; instead the merit plan should be implemented.(Patterson 500)
The most common form of judicial elections involves competitive elections of either a partisan or a non partisan nature.(Patterson 499) Just like in the merit plan, under which the governor appoints a judge from a short list of acceptable candidates provided by a judicial selection commission. The selected judge must then be reviewed periodically by the voters, who, rather than choosing between the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Court Issues

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages

    One of the issues facing the court system today is judges are not able to see many cases because of their administrative role. Judges spend the majority of their time “papering budgets, scheduling cases, supervising employees, and maintaining court records” (Robinson, 2009, pg. 208, para 5). The courthouse employee’s work together getting cases dispensed as quickly as possible. Some of these cases are dismissed before even being seen because of how many cases there are. Many of the minor cases are plea bargained so that the…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has a unique court system. One of the elements that make it a unique system is the judicial selection process. The qualifications, method of selection and election and removal from the bench vary from state to state. The average person would believe there would be a Constitutional or statutory qualification to serve as a judge. This is not the case in the United States (Judicial Process in America 8th edition pg. 125 chapter 6). The states of Pennsylvania and Arizona have their own agenda when it comes to the judicial selection process.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    State Judges Case Study

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The position is an appointed position and not an elected one like most state judges, said Ron Postell Grand Prairie city attorney. Arnold applied for the position and went through an interview. Tom Hart, Grand Prairie city manager, selected Arnold for the position. The city council then had to approve a two-year contract for the position.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The state of Florida is amongst 16 other states that selects judges through the method “appointment-retention election”. A method in which a proposing group shows names to the governor, who then makes the appointment; appointees need to win a retention vote in the next election. It is not necessarily a good system because the selection is placed in the hands of the judges or attorneys who comprise the nominating committee and the governor, with only a impression of voter input. Reorganizers argue that the plan eliminate judges from politics and saves the electorate the problem of voting on judicial candidates when they know little about their professional qualifications.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CJUS 330

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Judges: in state courts they are elected by the voters. Federal judges are nominated by the president. Judges are the ultimate authority figures in the courthouse. Only they can set bail, instruct jurors, and impose sentences.…

    • 2002 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This fact is solidly undisputable because when money and political influence are used in selecting leaders of any society, then it implies that there are those who will be left out of the decision-making process because of the class they belong or social status to which they are categorized. For full inclusion of people in leadership processes, justice and truth must always prevail (Mott, 49). Therefore, concerning the case of Texas judge selection criterion, it is arguably not the best practice due to a multiplicity of reasons that have been highlighted herein. Consequently, necessary modifications need to be carried out that are in line with the suggestions of this paper for the sole rationale of achieving inclusivity, an open display of service delivery as well as transparency (Maxwell,…

    • 1669 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Texas is one of the only two states that re-elects its judges in partisan elections casting a straight-ticket…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today ' s decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year ' s Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation ' s confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” Through this statement it is obvious that Justice Stevens believes that the Federal Courts has no place in interfering on state voter laws and that the decision that was made by the majority of US Supreme Court Justices will negatively influence the perception of the Supreme Court. Justice Stevens is supported by Justice Breyer: “…the Court is not acting to vindicate a fundamental constitutional principle, such as the need to protect a basic human liberty. No other strong reason to act is present. Congressional statutes tend to obviate the need. And, above all, in this highly politicized matter, the appearance of a split decision runs the risk of undermining the public ' s confidence in the Court itself. That confidence is a public treasure. It has…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A partisan election is an election where candidates are listed on the ballot with the indication of their political party. This is a system where judges are selected through partisan elections are voted in the electorate, and often run as part of a political party’s candidate. Texas is one of the few states that elect judges in partisan elections. It has been suggested that perhaps this is not an appropriate way to choose judges, given the nature of their job. It may have some flaws like lack of minority representation on the bench and perception of fairness. But it has some advantages too. On my opinion, I think it is faster than the other form of election as a general voter have that candidates on the ballot from democrats, republican or independent column.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Texas, all levels of Judges are elected to the individual court positions through a partisan ballot. Each candidate for…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think the Wyoming judicial selection procedure is less good when it comes to retention. I do think it is a good idea for the people to have a say in retention. However, as the data about Justice Voight proves, not many residents of Wyoming know who he is much less can evaluate the whether he has been doing a good job. I suspect the only reason he was voted for retention is people don’t like change.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By making decisions regarding the interest of the society the courts assume responsibilities that belong exclusively to the legislative and executive branches of government. The Supreme Court justices may rule based on what is in their best interest while saying that they are deciding for the good of the society. Moreover, when the Supreme Court justices are appointed, not elected, they may not be the representatives of the public’s view. As a result, judges begin making policy decisions about social or political changes society should make and become “unelected legislators.” By freely interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, the communities’ confidence in the Supreme Court will be undermined. When judicial activism in the Supreme Court wields too much power, it can eventually destruct the essence of…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Judicial Branch

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Our American judiciary branch of the federal government has contributed and molded our American beliefs in this great nation. This branch of government is respected because of the code of conduct that the judges, no matter how conservative or liberal. The language of the court as well as the uniform of the cloaks that judges wear has most probably contributed towards this widespread respect. Throughout the history of the United States, I noticed a pattern of “cause and effect” that our judiciary branch had practiced. I noticed that the judicial branch usually restrain themselves from involving in critical civil policy, but will be active when the time comes when the general public, in which the case is decided, feels a change is needed. We have enough evidence to see how our judicial branch should act. Should the judicial branch be more active towards shaping American policy or restrain as long as possible before being forced to act upon very critical civil policies? Judicial activism is the view that the Supreme Court should be an active and creative partner with the legislative and executive branches in shaping government policy (Wasserman American Politics 138). The believers of this philosophical view of how our judicial branch should be suggest that the Supreme Court more active and participate in molding the policies of American society. It can be argued that during the end of the Civil War and the “Separate but Equal” era, in cases such as the Brown v. Board of Education, Baker v. Carr, Missouri ex. Rel. Gaines v. Canada, and Sweatt v. Painter. The more recent, Bush v. Gore case is a fine example of judicial activism. Judicial Restraint, on the other hand, is the idea that the Court should not impose its views on other branches of the government or the states unless there is a clear violation of the Constitution (Wasserman American Politics 138). Judges, who believes in this form of our court system, say that a passive role of the court is preferred and that…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Business Law Module 1

    • 2075 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Article 6 section 1 of the State of California’s constitution states there are three different types of courts that have judicial power of California that were established under the State of California’s Constitution. They are the Supreme Court, courts of appeal, and superior courts which are all courts of record. The Supreme Court is made up of six associate justices and the Chief Justice of California who can summon the court whenever they like. However agreement of four judges that are at the argument are required for a judgment. There is a Court of Appeal in each district of the state of California which has one or more divisions. In each division of the Court of Appeal it is made up of a presiding justice and two or more associate justices. Agreement of two judges that are at the argument is required for a judgment. A superior court is in each county of the state of California and consist of one or more judges. As stated in the constitution of the State of California, “The Legislature shall prescribe the number of judges and provide for the officers and employees of each superior court. If the governing body of each affected county concurs, the Legislature may provide that one or more judges serve more than one superior court. In each superior court there is an appellate division. The Chief Justice shall assign judges to the appellate division for specified terms pursuant to rules, not inconsistent with statute, adopted by the Judicial Council to promote the independence of the appellate division” (www.leginfo.ca.gov). All the of the courts of California which are the Supreme Court, Courts…

    • 2075 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics