Preview

How Can It Help the Environment to Eat Less Meat?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
568 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Can It Help the Environment to Eat Less Meat?
How can it help the enviroment to eat less meat?
We all know about the big problems in our enviroment. We pollute too much and do too less against global warming. Everybody can take part of improving this big problem, but only a few people do it, even though there are so many different ways.
One thing is our consumption, but how can we help the enviroment with eating less meat? The meat industry is one of the main polluter in the world. It begins with the culture of the animals, who are unexceptional furnisher for meat. Just for this using they are cultured, what is associated with much polluting. For the structure and installation for keeping animals many forests are cutted down, what means there are less plants to transform carbon dioxide to dioxygen. To feed a vegetarian, you need 20 times less acreage. The animal husbandry is associated with producing much food for these animals, for one kilo of meat you need 7 kilos of food, what is pretty much, so there are again less crops for doing photosynthesis. Cows are farting, it's a fact, so there is more methane in the air.
For producing one kilo of meat, you need 15.500l of water, with this amount you could shower for a whole year. From one town to another, for slaughter, working up, packaging, and driving the products to the supermarkets, these transports are emmiting much carbon dioxide, useless pollution of the air, simply for eating a steak.
But when the food arrives at the supermarket, it is not the end. The refrigeration and the light have an impact on the enviroment, it is an immense pollution to produce the refrigerators and the lamps, and also the elictricity is dangerous. Many elictricity is won from eviromentally damaging factories or in the worst case from nuclear power stations. The nuclear energy is controversial, because the rubbish of these stations has a very long radioactive half-life and no one really knows where to desposit the containers so it pollutes the enviroment

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A person who eats animals will consume 100+ animals per year. More than 10 billion animals are bred and slaughtered for food every year in the U.S. alone.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A graph in an environmental magazine illustrates the number of greenhouse gas emitted with most of the greenhouse gas emissions coming from production, not transport, as most people would think (Source D). This graph illustrates, contrary to common perception, that most of the greenhouse gases produced are dependent on the how the food was produced, rather than how the food was shipped. Therefore, eating locally would not necessarily save the earth from much greenhouse gas emissions. Similarly, James McWilliams argues that “New Zealand lamb is raised on pastures with a small carbon footprint, whereas most English lamb is produced under intensive factory-like conditions with a big carbon footprint” (Source C). McWilliams’s statement illustrates how buying local foods can be harmful to the environment. He argues that if a British person were to buy a locally raised lamb that it would emit more carbon emissions than a New Zealand raised lamb that was transported to the United Kingdom, due the large difference in carbon emissions from variants in production methods. Locally grown foods, contrary to general belief, are not necessarily more environmentally friendly than mass produced foods in supermarkets. This is illustrated by the fact that foods create more greenhouse gases in production than in transportation.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * The way we eat today causes cruelty to animals, demands high levels of energy and water usage, contributes to global warming, limits our compassion, and is controlled by the most powerful people on the planet.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case study from chapter 1 of Environmental Ethics for Canadians confirms Williston’s view on the ethical progress of consuming meat. His view is supported through his analysis between the relationship of eating meat and climate change, which references Regan and Singer’s perspective on animal welfarism.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Feedlot industries are not planet-friendly, beef produces methane and caused greenhouse effect. Most of the supermarket in Bay Are like Food Source sells feedlot meats by sold industrialized companies like Tyson, Swift, Cargill, and National Beef. These companies are cruel as they separate the cows from their calf just after birth just to make money from the milk and the poor calves are forced to eat corn to survive. I think this act is unethical as both the mumThese companies keep all the farmers under their control, with paying them only minimum amount of income, the farmers are in debt due to high demands to updating the feedlot sheds. We should become responsible and eat meat which grown eating pasture and free ranch, where the animals…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Eric Schlosser’s book Fast Food Nation, Michael Moss’ article The Burger That Shattered Her Life and the documentary Food Inc. all come together to inform people on the facts about the food industry’s contamination issue. The food industry has many slaughterhouses and meat packing industries in the United States. People never think about where there meat has come from, how it is prepared, stored, or made. Unfortunately, the sanitation of our meat from where it starts to when we eat it is appalling. Many farms now raise livestock in mass groups in dirty environments, they gather into unsanitary slaughterhouses to be killed with unsanitary utensils, methods, and machinery, the meat gets combined with other meat in filthy meat packing industries, and is then packed away for us to eat. Farms should raise cows how they used to be raised, consumers…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    as humans to make changes with the way we live in order to cut down the amount of pollution that gets…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eating less meat is not going to solve all the problems in the world but it can have a positive impact such as the environment rational. Fraser stated, “If Americans just ate less meat – like driving cars less often – the problem could be alleviated without giving up meat entirely. (698). This approach has worked for centuries and continues to work in America and Europe. The problem isn’t meat, but too much meat. (698). The way we eat meat and how often we eat it can cause a major effect on the environment. The more meat Americans eat, the more animals’…

    • 451 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The author starts off strong with logos, which appeals to logic. In response to the comments about animals in our food production, she writes, “the studies show only that the prevailing methods of producing meat — that is, crowding animals together in factory farms, storing their waste in giant lagoons and cutting down forests to grow crops to feed them — cause substantial greenhouse gases” (Niman), meaning that small farms and farms can cut down on greenhouse gases if, “they keep their animals outdoors on pasture and make little use of machinery.” (Niman) She points out, “In contrast to traditional farms, industrial livestock and poultry facilities keep animals in buildings with mechanized systems for feeding, lighting, sewage flushing, ventilation, heating and cooling, all of which generate emissions,” which are what most statistics pointing the guilt finger at meat production are referring to. The author, being a “rancher…who raises cattle, goats and turkeys the traditional way (on grass)” (Niman), neatly brushes off relations of “meat (especially beef) is closely linked to global warming” (Niman), to her own farm. Meat and dairy would certainly win the greenhouse gas competition if not…

    • 884 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lab-grown burger

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages

    World's population is rising significantly, and it's expected to be around 9 billion by 2050. It not only brings problems like space but also food shortage onward with scarcity of natural resources and energy for people and farms. More people automatically means the need for more food and meat is being seen as a problem since it's currently almost at it's maximum production. However this numbers could be much lower. Meat consumption is way higher than what it should be, ethical terms apart, it's all about a global health problem. Excess meat contributes for various cardio-vascular diseases as well as different kinds of cancer.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the major arguments within today’s food dilemma, is whether or not it is ethical for us humans to consume meat. The issue rises from the mistreatment of farm animals in horrible conditions to the horrific slaughter. Several people such as Singer are arguing that in order to solve this issue we must stop the consumption of meat and animal products. However many other people believe that animal consumption is natural and it is what makes us human. In the following, I will challenge Singer’s view of which we should stop animal consumption by arguing that to stop eating meat is morally unacceptable and impractical for humans.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Food Sustainability

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Siebert, Michael. "Food Ark." National Geographic Magazine. National Geographic Society, July 2011. Web. 01 May 2012. This covers the rapidly dwindling biodiversity in our fields. It states in the summary that to feed our growing population, we’ll need to double food production. Yet crop yields aren’t increasing fast enough, and climate change and new diseases threaten the limited varieties we’ve come to depend on for food.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The article, “Vegetarian is the New Prius”, written by Kathy Freston, discusses the amount of contribution that livestock actively plays in the most crucial and serious environmental problem, from a local scale to global scale. Freston writes that the amount of livestock raised in United States soil is the main cause of air pollution, land degradation, water shortage, water pollution, biodiversity, and especially aids to global warming. This article attempts to convince readers to cut meat out of their diet and to become vegetarians, so that less livestock would be raised to feed the people and environmental issues would be cut down. Although it is true that Freston provides the audience with solid, legitimate factual arguments concerning the brutal slaughtering and consumption of livestock by humans, she fails to address the opposing argument. Although I am a personal fan of vegetarian foods, I disagree with Freston, primarily because my family has raised me on chicken and other meats. I believe that there will be livestock whether a lot of people change their diets and become vegetarians or not. At the University of Chicago, researches concluded that feeding animals for the production of meat, eggs, and dairy products requires growing upwards of ten times as many crops needed than if we just went without livestock. According to a report done by the United Nations animal agriculture takes up 70% of all agricultural land, and 30% of the total land surface of the planet. Upon seeing these disturbing facts, I do not believe that society will never 100% convert to a vegetarian lifestyle. Even if they do, there will still be millions of wild animals producing all of the same gases that are so harmful to our environment.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, Jilin, 130118, China Abstract: The influence of methane and ammonia which come from animal production on global climate changes was discussed in this paper. Meanwhile, the author analyzed the effect of this change on agriculture and animal industry, and also analyzed its control measures in this article.. Key words: animal industry production, global climate change, methane, ammonia There is only one earth in the world, so the problem of the global environmental change is generally paid attention around the world. Increasing human activities leads to the deterioration of ecological environment. According to UNEP(Union Nations Environment Plan Department) and WMO(World Meteorology Organization), because of greenhouse effect, it is possible that average air temperature of the earth is increased by 0.5~2.0? , change takes place in the pattern of rain and snow, rainfall and evaporation are increased by 2%~13% and Asian monsoon system is strengthened. All these changes will have great impact on the utilization of land and agriculture in our country. Fluctuation and change of future climate, especially the effect of the warm-increasing of greenhouse gases, may further lead to the disaster of flood and drought. According to data concerned, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen oxide and so on are major gases resulting in greenhouse effect. 15%~20% of results of climate warming are due to methane, which is the second major greenhouse gas next to carbon dioxide and whose influence is 21 times that of carbon dioxide , so the problem of emission of methane is concerned by all professionals. During animal industry, the output of methane emitted from ruminants accounts for 1/5 of that in atmosphere. In particular, cattle produce the greatest amount of methane, being 2~3 times that of other ruminants. Other livestocks are also…

    • 2603 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays