Case: Bell v. Starbucks U.S. Brands Corp.‚ 389 F.Supp.2d 766 (2005)‚ United States District Court Facts: Rex Bell‚ the owner of a small‚ privately owned music venue‚ filed a complaint against Starbuck’s U.S. Brands Corp in response to receiving “cease and desist” letters after he applied for registration‚ with the United States Patent and Trademark Office‚ of the “Starbock Beer” trademark. Bell was seeking a declaratory judgement that the use of the “Star Bock Beer” logo and name‚ in connection with
Premium Law Contract Supreme Court of the United States
Section 1 Essay U.S. v. Windsor‚ 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013)‚ is a case about a same-sex couple that was married in 2007 in Ontario‚ Canada because at that time same-sex marriage was not legal in New York. The same-sex couple‚ Edith Windsor and Thea Spyer resided in New York. Two years after the couple was married‚ Spyer died‚ and left all of her estate to her wife‚ Windsor. When Windsor went to claim the federal estate tax exemption for surviving spouses‚ she was denied because of the federal Defense
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Same-sex marriage United States Constitution
v. Wade; then defend or criticize it. There are many different choices of lifestyle and decisions that people make that everyone does not agree with. There are always controversies when it comes to the LGBT community‚ gun laws‚ and abortion. In the case Roe v. Wade‚ they were questioning whether the constitution contained parts that granted women the rights to get an abortion that also nullified the Texas prohibition. Some people may feel that abortions should be legal for all women to have‚ but I
Premium Abortion Roe v. Wade Pregnancy
Legal Memorandum on Rogers v. Wycoff case From: Jamshid AKHMEDOV To: Therese KEELAGHAN Date: November 5‚ 2012 1) Relevant facts: Defendant: Edward Wycoff‚ 40 Defense attorney: Defendant acts as his own attorney Victims: Julie Rogers‚ 47 and Paul Rogers‚ 47 Plaintiff attorney: Deputy District Attorney Mark Peterson Witness (also a Victim): Victims’ son Eric Rogers‚ 20 Witness’ attorney: Tedd W. Cassman Judge: Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge John W
Premium United States Jury Civil procedure
The story “This Is What It Means to Say Phoenix‚ Arizona” by Sherman Alexie’s focuses on Victor and Thomas. Victor and Thomas has grown up and spent their childhood together. Thomas is an eccentric character; he likes to tell same stories again and again and sometimes babble to people. Because of Thomas behavior‚ nobody likes to be around him and listen to him. The tale is about Victor‚ who comes to know about his father’s death from heart attack. Victor has a strained relation with his father‚ and
Premium
Case: Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services‚ Inc. (2000) The United States District Court for the District of Kansas Westlaw Facts: Ms. Deters‚ the plaintiff‚ sued Equifax‚ the defendant‚ in the United States District Court for the district of Kansas after being sexually harassed on several different occasions by three different co-workers and also the original male supervisor. Violating Title VII‚ prohibiting discrimination of employees based on race‚ color‚ religion‚ sex and national
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States Appeal
People v. Downey Issue To conduct a probation search of a home‚ must officers have probable cause to believe that the probationer lives there? Or will reasonable suspicion suffice? Facts Riverside police detective Kevin Townsend decided to conduct a probation search on George Roussell’s home. The detective was having a very time trying to figure out where the Roussell lived. The probation agency said that Roussell lived in Moreno Valley‚ but the court system said that he lived in Corona. Roussells
Premium Criminal law Police Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
CITATION: Heath v. Alabama‚ 472 U.S. 82 (1985). PARTIES: Petitioner = Larry Gene Heath Respondent = Alabama FAC TS: The petitioner‚ a resident of Russel County‚ Alabama hired Charles Owens and Gregory Lumpkin to kill his wife‚ Rebecca McGuire Heath‚ for $2‚000. Mr. Heath left his residence in Alabama to meet Mr. Owens and Mr. Lumpkin in Georgia‚ just across the Alabama state line. Mr. Heath led the two men back to his residence in Alabama‚ gave them the keys to his car and
Premium Law United States Appeal
Brown vs. Board of Education Brown vs. Board of Education‚ in 1954‚ was a major case that dealt with the racial segregation of children in public schools violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Although the decision did not succeed in fully integrating public education in the United States‚ it put the Constitution on the side of racial equality and sent the civil rights movement into a full revolution. This case was presented to the court by Oliver Brown was against the
Premium Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court of the United States Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Summary of the Case The case Ferguson v FCT (1979) 9 ATR 873 is an appeal case. Ferguson (tax payer) was a member of the Royal Australian Navy and before he was about to retire‚ he had formed is retirement plans of establishing a business of primary production. In order to start his business he entered into an arrangement with Cattle Leasing Ltd who specialized in the leasing of cattle‚ made available to Ferguson five Charolais half-cross cows for a period of four years. He also entered in
Premium Law United States Australia