Richardson was required to pay child support accordingly and have visitation rights. The case is good law. It is binding to Arkansas court. Clearly‚ Arkansas court made the final judgment about the custody of the child and visitation by the father. b) Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.‚ 45 A.2d 553 (1945). The Court of Chancery is not given the jurisdiction to award penalties on government cost recovery cases as it is of limited jurisdiction. Therefore its laws are not mandatory as it can be honored
Premium United States Law Court
Corporation. 123 Ohio St.3d 216‚ 2009-Ohio-4231 Facts of the Case: LaNisa Allen appealed the original judgment in favor of Totes/Isotoner Corporation on the issue of whether the Ohio Fair Employment Practices Act‚ as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act‚ prohibits an employer from discriminating against a female employee because of or on the basis of lactation. Relevant law associated includes whether Allen established a prima facie case of “sex discrimination on the basis of pregnancy‚” or whether
Premium Pregnancy Discrimination Prima facie
Unfortunately‚ public defenders are the hardest working attorneys and sector of the legal system because they are severely understaffed. Therefore‚ they are represented by public defenders‚ which is a granted constitutional right in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright. This case specified that states are required to provide defense attorneys to defendants convicted of a felony or serious crime that cannot provide attorney representation for themselves. According to Brunt (2015)‚ “approximately 80% of the offenders
Premium Prison Crime Criminal justice
The Tinker v. Des Moines case happended during the Vietnam War between 1955 and 1975. Thousans of protests occured againts the Vietnam War in the United States between those 2 dates. In the fall of 1965 in Iowa with a group of 3 minors named Mary Beth Tinker‚ John Tinker and Christopher Eckhardt. They came to School wearing black armband to protest against the Vietnam War. They were asked to take it off or they would be suspended. They disagreed and the school later suspended them because people
Premium High school Education Supreme Court of the United States
Marbury v. Madison is a court case that was decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1803 involving William Marbury as the Plaintiff and James Madison as the Defendant (History.com staff‚ 2009). As a result of this case‚ the United States Supreme Court was granted the power to perform judicial review (“Judicial Review”‚ n.d.). With the power of judicial review‚ the United States Supreme Court is now permitted to review laws from the legislature and executive orders from the President to determine
Premium
University Crawford v. Washington Analysis Cross-examination is critical during litigation. Many cases have to be proven based on solely witness testimony because of the lack of physical evidence. Therefore‚ the responsibility of a witness to tell the truth relies on methods to encourage witnesses to maintain their credibility. According to Gardner and Anderson in their book Criminal Evidence: Principles and Cases‚ the witnesses must take an oath or affirmation that their say will be true and the witnesses
Premium Evidence law Testimony Supreme Court of the United States
I‚ Jessica‚ write this opinion to majority on the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier. The majority opinion claimed that the principal did the right thing in removing the pages before printing. It argued that it did not violate student’s rights‚ but on the other hand it protected the parents in the divorce article and the identities in the pregnancy article. By protecting the rights of others‚ he was also protecting the rights of those individual students mentioned in the articles and the school’s image
Premium Freedom of speech First Amendment to the United States Constitution Human rights
Michelle Vandeprool March 10‚ 2013 SPD 616 IEP Case Study Review Hurry v. Jones Having reviewed the case Hurry V. Jones 734 F.2d 879 (1st Cir. 1984)‚ at first reading of the case and with my novice awareness of the law I am seriously concerned as to why this ever went to court. IDEA and the constitution of the United States guarantee that students will receive a free public education no matter what their handicaps. The District should have provided some method by which
Premium Education Lawsuit Dispute resolution
March 26‚ 1812‚ by combining Elbridge Gerry’s last name and the word salamander. Gerrymandering is currently legal as there aren’t any laws that prohibit its use. However‚ some courts have ruled some gerrymandering cases as unconstitutional. It is believed that Gill v. Whitford case could bring about new regulations to the Gerrymandering.
Premium
Title and Citation: County of Riverside v McGlaughlin‚ 500 U.S. 44 (1991) Type of Action: This Criminal case in which the Maclaughlin claimed that his Fourth Amendment was violated due to the 48 hours arraignment for Probable cause. Facts of Case: Offender MacLaughlin started a legal claim‚ affirming that the County’s routine of consolidating arraignment with a determination of reasonable justification for individuals subject to warrantless arrest was not adequately provoke under the Fourth Amendment
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States