Preview

Heath Vs Alabama Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
460 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Heath Vs Alabama Case Study
CITATION:
Heath v. Alabama, 472 U.S. 82 (1985).

PARTIES:
Petitioner = Larry Gene Heath Respondent = Alabama FAC TS:
The petitioner, a resident of Russel County, Alabama hired Charles Owens and Gregory Lumpkin to kill his wife, Rebecca McGuire Heath, for $2,000. Mr. Heath left his residence in Alabama to meet Mr. Owens and Mr. Lumpkin in Georgia, just across the Alabama state line. Mr. Heath led the two men back to his residence in Alabama, gave them the keys to his car and home. The two men then kidnapped Mrs Heath. The car belonging to the Heath’s was later found on the side of a road in Troup County, Georgia. Mrs. Heath's body was inside. The cause of death was a gunshot wound to the head.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
…show more content…
The men who he hired kidnapped his wife in one state and killed her in another. In February 1982, the petitioner pleaded guilty to “malice murder” in Georgia in exchange for a sentence of life imprisonment. However, he was also prosecuted in an Alabama trial court for murder during a kidnapping. He was convicted and sentenced to death from the Alabama court. He claimed that the second trial exposed him to Double Jeopardy in violation of the clause of the Fifth Amendment. Mr. Heath appealed, but the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals and the Supreme Court of Alabama affirmed the conviction. ISSUE:
Under the dual sovereignty doctrine, is it legally permissible for two states to prosecute the same defendant for the same offense without committing Double Jeopardy?

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Briefly, the summary judgment facts of St. John v. Pope (1995) noted that Pope, who had recently undergone back pain surgery and epidural injections at Round Rock Hospital, went to the Central Texas Medical Center emergency room in San Marcos for back pain and fever. The emergency room physician, at Central Texas Medical Center, telephoned St. John, the on-call physician, who recommended Pope be referred to the Round Rock Hospital, where his surgeon was on staff. However, when Round Rock Hospital’s emergency room refused to accept Pope, he went home. The following day in a hospital in Austin, a lumbar puncture revealed Pope was suffering from meningitis, which resulted in permanent disabilities (St. John v. Pope, 1995).…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court Judge Eugene Benton forewarned McKenzie Crowe that she could actually get fifteen years in confinement. The Judge handed down the case to the prosecutor, who advised McKenzie that she has up to four years to file for habeus corpus. The prosecutor then proceeded to ask McKenzie if she gives up her rights and pleads guilty. After reading McKenzie her Miranda rights she suggests for the states recommendation for counts two and counts four. The Judge then read the Miranda rights to McKenzie asking her if she understands, and if all the facts are true. The Judge made it perfectly clear that there could be…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oreste Fulminante (the defendant) left Arizona, after law officials suspected him in the murder of his stepdaughter, Jeneane Mitchell Hunt. While in New York he was taken into custody for an unrelated crime consequently sending him to federal prison. During his incarceration, he befriended Anthony Sarivola, who worked as a paid FBI informant on other inmates while he served his prison term. Upon hearing of the suspicion of whether Fulminante murdered his step daughter FBI told Sarivola to obtain further information in hopes of a confession, at first Fulminante denied he was involved. In light of the inmates treating him harshly due to the rumors of the defendant molesting and killing a child, Sarivola offered protection to the defendant granted that he reveal the murder in full detail. When released six months later, the defendant additionally confessed to the same crime to Sarivola’s wife, whom he had never met before, as they drove him to Pennsylvania. Concluding an indictment in Arizona for first-degree murder.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Tennessee Valley Auth. v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978) (“Tennessee Valley Auth v Hill”), it was discussed whether a small endangered fish called the “snail darter” could stop the “intended transformation of the river into a 30 mile long reservoir by building the Tellico Dam. Congress had authorised funding for the project in 1967 to generate hydroelectricity, create recreational opportunities and flood control, and promote shoreline developments.” The question remains, what was the case about? Put simply, it was sustaining an environment and protection of endangered species of a little fish. Wm. Robert Irvin of the President of American River in his article in the Huffington Post stated “It was a fight to save a river, one that was itself endangered and crucial to the lives, livelihoods, and heritage of the people who loved…

    • 1911 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: After spending a morning and afternoon drinking beer and injecting cocaine, Pervis Tyrone Payne entered the apartment of 28-year-old Charisse Christopher and her two children, Lacie, age two and Nicholas, age three at approximately 3:00 p.m. on June 27th, 1987. Payne made sexual advances toward Charisse Christopher. She resisted, which lead Payne to kill both Charisse and Lacie. Nicholas was found with several severe stab wounds that completely penetrated him front to back, but he managed to survive. Payne was apprehended later that day hiding in the attic of a former girlfriend’s house. Payne was convicted by a jury of two counts of murder. At sentencing, Payne presented the testimony of his mother, father, Bobbie Thomas and a clinical psychologist. These testimonies’ showed Payne was of good character, he attended church and he was of low intelligence and mentally handicapped. The State presented the testimony of Ms. Christopher’s mother, who spoke of the negative impact of the murders on Nicholas. Furthermore, the prosecutor presented argument regarding Nicholas’ experience. The jury sentenced the Payne to death on each count of murder.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief Nash V. Auburn

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Two Students of Auburn University David Nash and Donna Perry were accused of cheating on their anatomy exams, which was a violation of the Student Code of Professional Ethics at Auburn. At a university hearing which was to determine the merits of their charge, faculty and student witnesses testified they observed Nash and Perry cheating in various way and at multiple times during their exams. At the conclusion of the hearing the students were suspended from the university, they appealed with dean and then later the president of Auburn, who both agreed with the hearings judgment. The students then filed suit, arguing that Auburn suspended them based on constitutionally inadequate procedures that violated their rights under the due process clause. The district court entered judgment for Auburn, the students then appealed and the courts of appeals agreed with the district court decision.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Thompson versus Oklahoma raises a number of issues regarding the trials and punishment of juveniles for heinous crimes. This case was argued on November 9, 1987 and involves the trial of fifteen-year-old William Wayne Thompson. Along with his older brother and two friends, William Thomspon brutally murdered Charles Keene, his sister’s husband. His motive was revenge for abusing his sister. William Thompson was a “child” according to Oklahoma law, but he was tried as an adult, convicted with murder, and sentenced to death. The Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma upheld this ruling. Because he was only fifteen years old at the time of the murder, this ruling violated the Eighth Amendment, causing this case to be brought to the Supreme…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Huntsville Hospital (HH), located in Northeast Alabama, is part of the Huntsville Hospital Health System, originating in downtown Huntsville, Alabama in the late 1800’s. As the not-for-profit, public hospital system developed, HH became the second largest employer in Madison County, Alabama with an estimated 7000 employees, 2000 nurses and 1000 physicians.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985), is a civil case in which the Supreme Court of the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gregg V. Georgia 1976

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A Jury found Troy Gregg guilty of committing an armed robbery and murder. In accordance with Georgia law, the trial was in two stages, a guilt stage, and a sentencing stage. At the guilt stage of Georgia's bifurcated procedure, the jury found the petitioner guilty of two accounts armed robbery and murder. At the penalty stage, the judge instructed the jury that it could recommend either a death sentence or a life prison sentence on each count and the jury returned the verdict of death. Challenging his death sentence, Gregg claimed that his capital sentence was "cruel and unusual" punishment, violating the 8th and 14th amendment.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Generally, the purpose of the ethics committee in health care is to deliberate and rectify complicated and unusual matters involving issues that affect the care, and treatment of patients within the health care institution (Morrison, 2014). Members of the ethics committee should be chosen on the elements of their concern for the welfare of the sick and interest matters, and their reputation in the community and among their peers for integrity and mature judgment. Ideally, the purpose of the ethics committee should be curbed solely to ethical matters. In addition, the ethical committee’s communications and deliberations should comply with institutional and ethical policies for protecting the privacy of patient’s information (Greenwood, 2015)…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The facts of the case are as follow; “on May 8, 1993, John Kilioi Miller stabbed to death Robyn Goring, whom he shared an apartment with along with their children. He was discovered by an officer who also lived in the same apartment complex. She had heard a loud noise which took her to the discovery of the horrible crime that had just took place. The minute the officer arrived Miller replied, “I lost it,” and at the same time apologizing for what he had done. She then observed the body of Goring which was lying on the kitchen floor with a knife in her body. It was later sought by the medical examiner that there where forty-two stab wounds in Goring. Miller gave a voluntary statement to police about the incident.”…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Abortion Policy Paper

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In this document you will find my view on Abortion, and the policy I have proposed. You will also see the history and views of abortion.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kristin’s Death

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This case is based on the death of Kristin whose author is her father. Michael Carter was Kristin’s ex-boyfriend, his past criminal record demonstrates how easy it is for criminals to get away with murder. I’m going to go over some of his past criminal record to demonstrate how Michael Cartier should have never been set free in the streets, and to demonstrate how many opportunities our justice system had to put him away in jail before he committed more crimes. I believe that the best way to present Michael’s criminal history is by covering some of the many encounters he had with our justice system prior to murdering Kristin as well as the consequences for his actions. The first arrest was 1998 for burglary, when arrested Michael was sentenced to six month in jail. However, he never served any time for this crime. Followed by a sledgehammer rampage in 1990. Another incident where our justice system failed to put Michael in jail was on March 28, 199I when another of Michael’s violent abuse victim called his probation officer. The probation officer “told Rose to get a restraining order” (Stillman, 2010). Rose Ryan sister mentioned to the probation officer that Michael had a gun in his possession, this led the probation officer to obtain a warrant for Michael Cartier’s arrest. This didn’t stop Michael from attacking rose with a pair of scissors. When Michael was finally picked up by…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jennings vs. Armington

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Fifth Amendment states, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation..” (Legal Dictionary, 2013) The way it is seen in the courts, the Double Jeopardy Clause applies only to legal proceedings brought by state and federal governments in criminal court and it will not apply to civil tort suits individuals bring forth in civil court.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays