Preview

Who Was Shah Rukh Government Power?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
130 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Who Was Shah Rukh Government Power?
Shah Rukh was able to control a group of Turco-Mongol commanders. The power of the government and the army were dependent on the superior performance, no matter what position of those amirs, they have to contribute and obtain loyalty through their efforts. Lacking of experience was a critical problem, as the realm was in peace with other neighbor empires and no longer had to expand, young men had a limited opportunity to gain experience before inheriting the position of their fathers. Since Shah Rukh unlike his father, left the details to be coordinated by amirs and interfered only in the important issues, created personal conflicts which in harms the performance of his military. After the death of Firuzshah in 1445, Shah Rukh government power

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Essay On Cyrus The Great

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Level 5 Leaders: To know why he is an effective leader, it may suffice to mention that all his commanders obeyed him as they trusted him. Meanwhile, there are many historical facts that he influenced other great leaders in his era and even after his death these influences continued to exist and inspire great leaders of the world. He was an executive leader, as he used to be in the most front line of any battle, also he was involving in valuable Persian architecture and moreover he was writing all orders about the other religious treatments and last but not least he was totally involved in political structures of his…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gunpowder Empires Dbq

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Great leadership early on in the Muslim empires helped maintain dominance.According to Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq,Suleiman the Magnificent,who was the Ottoman Sultan from 1520-1560 ,chose leaders and high ranked officials based on how their work ethics are."Those who receive the highest offices from the Sultan...do not believe that high qualities are either natural or hereditary... but are partly a gift of God,and are partly result of good training..."Which shows that the empires chose leaders and high ranked officials are chosen very strictly ,which led to great leaders in the dynasties.(Doc.3) Abdul ul-Qadir Bada' uni was a Muslim cleric who wrote about how the emperor Akbar the Great,Mughal ruler from 1556 CE to 1605 CE, who further educated himself from different perspectives,from Brahmans,Priest,Buddhist monks and many…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongol leaders also contributed greatly to their success. Khan (known as Great Khan), the very powerful military leader, didn’t tolerate the defiance of others “if you do not obey the command of Heaven, and run counter to our orders we shall know that you are our foe,” (Doc: 9). This statement is a response to the Pope, another powerful leader. The Pope recognizes the force which Khan is using “with a fury still unabated you do not cease from breaking the bonds of natural ties, sparing neither sex nor age, you rage against all indiscriminately with the sword of chastisement” (Doc: 8). This reestablishes the brutal force that Khan is using to benefit himself by leaving no survivors to spread information or become his enemies. Chinggis Khan was also a brutal leader, “he sent soldiers out against those of…

    • 522 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    4. Princes became adept at serving the mongols through tax collection and servants, beginning with Alexander Nevsky.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Mongols moved into china and Persia they immediately took over the political structures at the top. The smartest and most loyal Mongols took the highest position in political structures. The political structure of both was a dominating force squashing rebellions when necessary. Also In both Native Mongols always were the strongest political figures. They both took control of the political structures because it let them be in control and know what’s happening around the empire. Both Mongols in Persia and china at the top of political structures strongly…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap World Ch 20

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shah Abbas the Great – Safavid ruler 1587-1629; extended Safavid domain to greatest extent; created slave regiments based on captured Russians, who monopolized firearms within Safavid armies; incorporated Western military technology…

    • 1176 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mughal and Safavid were a few of the strongest empires in their time. These empires shared many similarities, but one major similarity is their political structures. The Safavid and Mughal both had a centralized government, based on military conquest, and were both Muslim based empires. But like many things these two empires do have differences, they were both in different regions, overall population was different, and the branch of Islam they followed was separate.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Mongols were a nomadic people until 1206, when they acknowledged Temujin as the supreme leader, Genghis Khan. A huge empire was created under his rule, linking Eastern and Western Eurasia. An analysis of these documents will discuss the topic of how the Mongols expanded their empire so far in such a short time through their power of violence. This analysis will also show the admiration and respect of the Mongols by others in surrounding regions. Ultimately, this analysis will discuss how the fear from other people gave the Mongols their biggest advantage in conquering other regions to expand their enormous empire.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Chapter 13 Ap World

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    b) his successors kept control of the area between Persia and Afghanistan for a century…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persians had a very good government. Before Persia became known as the largest empire in the world in its time period they were not unified. It wasn't until 522 B.C. that the Persian Empire became unified. Emperor Darius accomplished the real unification of this empire. Darius set up a government that was then used as a template for later rulers. He then divided the Persian Empire into section; a government official called a satrap headed each of these sections. The satraps were usually Persian and the people inside the local government were non-Persians. His government was a monarchy (kings/queens) and it was a centralized government. According to the economy and the wealth of each province, determined how much taxes would cost for that year. Like the great King Hammurabi, Darius adopted rules and laws from the people in which he conquered. Darius then drew a single code of laws in which the people within the empire had to abide by.”He did not abolish the existing laws of individual lands or peoples, nor did he impose a uniform law code on his entire empire.”(Bentley and Ziegler 170) .…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ancient History/Persepolis

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Persian kings were considered to be the ‘king of kings’. They were presented as great worriers, strong leaders, and magnificent successors. They were considered as a godly figure.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Persia’s rise to power began with the marriage between a Persian and a Median. Cyrus, the son of a powerful Persian chief, married a Median princess. The Medes had been the first to achieve a complex political organization in Central Asia near western Iran. The Persians eventually overthrew the Median monarch but maintained the framework of the Median government. In Persian society the warrior was dominant. Over the course of two decades the Persian rulers and their armies redrew the map of western Asia from Anatolia to Mesopotamia and as far as the Indus region. Cyrus and his successors used the traditions of the local people and the creation of a new organizational structure to maintain control of their empire. (103-104)…

    • 3485 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Iran Hostage Crisis

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages

    From World War II till his overthrow the Shah of Iran was a close ally with the United States and was one of the bases from which U.S. policy in the Middle East was built. Many times he was at odds with eight different U.S. Presidents over his social and economic reforms and refusal to grant political freedom. In a riot in 1963 the Shah arrested and exiled opposition leaders, one of those leaders was Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. From 1963 to 1979 the Shah spent billions of dollars on military weapons which loss him the support of the people. Not willing to give democratic freedoms and unable to make economic progress the Shah fled on 16 January 1979, during a revolution in Iraq. (2)…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The leaders of the Mongol Empire were definitely better at some aspects of ruling than others. One section they are known for is their violence and rapacity in their military. However, the Mongol’s violence brought more harm than good when compared to the economic practices of the empire.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    All the Shah's Men

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages

    There were many aspects concerning the history of Iran that showed that the coup was a bad idea. The role of religion played a very influential part in the history of Iran. Many people living in Iran still to this day believe in the Zoroastrian religion. The beliefs associated with this religion may account for many of the uprisings and political protests aimed at the Shah and his power. This religion taught Iranians that they "have an inalienable right to enlightened leadership and that the duty of subjects is not simply to obey wise kings but also to rise up against those who are wicked" (20). Many thought that the Shah was a terrible leader, and that he would continue to sell out his country to foreigners for the right amount of money. I believe that Mossadegh also believed this, and that he used this Zoroastrian belief to do so. The Shah did not have farr, because he did not act or behave morally. Even Shiism, which came about long after the religion of Zoroastrian, believes that rulers may hold the…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays