Utilitarian Theory Vs Social Justice Theory Essay

When trying to solve an issue, it can be stressful and time consuming to decide which one(s) apply in getting the more accurate results. Today we will be taking a look at the utilitarian theory and the social-justice theory, comparing and contrasting them; as well as how one would use their analyses on the world when looking at toxic waste issues. First, lets take a look at the utilitarian theory.
A utilitarian analysis of a toxic waste issue such as the Toxic Wastes and Race in the United States would be the understanding thought of “poor countries are more likely to suffer environmental degradation than wealthy countries” (DesJardins, 241). This is a thought out answer that follows the foundation of utilitarian platform “a philosophical theory that develops the common sense insight that the consequences of our decisions should play a significant role in deciding what to do” (DesJardins, 33). Moving onto the social-justice theory. A social-justice analysis
Meaning that no matter if it is nature, animals, humans, inanimate objects, ect. the utilitarian view wants to know how the receiving end will be. Where on the other hand, the social-justice theory is more focused on the social hierarchy {as stated above}. This meaning that they want the wealthy and higher class to suffer little to none compared to those below them. In conclusion, both analyses are similar in the fact that they are both concerned about the outcome of their decisions, but differ in what they are concerned about. Which at the end of the day, a main thing to keep in focus is, what is the goal of this decisions? Because there are some issues where the social-justice theory would be a better choice than the utilitarian theory, and some issue vice versa. There are even some issues where both theories could be used together to come to an agreement on how to solve an