Preview

Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
176 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Theories Of Justice: Utilitarianism, Retribution And Restitution
Aristotle once said, “It is in justice that the ordering of society is centered”. In our society there are theories of justice, which is Retribution, Utilitarianism and Restitution. These forms have similarities and differences and are use in many different social groups every day. Utilitarianism, Retribution and Restitution are all forms of theories of justice.
Utilitarian’s seek justice through morality, economic distribution and social welfare. Their morals are an absolute importance unlike Retribution which they advocate punishment. They focus on crimes that already have happen and like maximum punishment. They believe in an eye for an eye. On the other hand Restitution believe is service to the community and payment. Criminals pay money
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment
    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Feinberg's Theory of Punishment

    The Utilitarian Theory of punishment seeks to punish those that break the law in order to discourage or deter future wrongdoing. According to the Utilitarian Theory, law should be used in order to maximize the happiness of society. Both crime and punishment are inconsistent with happiness, and therefore utilitarianism believes that both of these factors should be kept to the minimum. The utilitarianism theory is ‘consequentialist,’ which means that utilitarianism recognizes that punishment has consequences for both the individual, and society as a whole. The total good that derives from the punishment must exceed the bad that may come from it.…

    • 859 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examples Of A Philosophical Construct
    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Examples Of A Philosophical Construct

    or allocates compensation in the case of injury or damage. Justice in this sense clearly involves the creation and enforcement of a public set of rules, but to be ‘just’ these rules must themselves have a moral underpinningThe issue of justice lies at the heart of questions about legitimacy and orderly existence, determining whether citizens are willing to accept the law as binding..Supporters of retribution may argue that in principle justice demands that the murderer’s life be forfeit in punishment for his crime; those who advocate deterrence may accept capital punishment but only when empirical evidence indicates that it will…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Distributive Justice Theory
    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Distributive Justice Theory

    Each theory of justice has its own process and objective. As a result, the outcomes of crime differ. The purpose of this paper seeks to examine a crime through the lens of four theories of justice: retributive, utilitarian, restorative, and parallel. Moreover, the paper will elaborate more on each theory of justice, including the theory’s procedural and distributive justice, through its hypothetical application of a criminal case in Fairfax County, Virginia. These various theories of justice arose from how society should go about restoring the social contract. The social contract theory states that society has the obligation to restore the imbalance when one of society’s members breaks the social contract (Newmark, 2017). How one decides to…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Principle Of Restorative Justice
    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Principle Of Restorative Justice

    2. What are the main principles underlying restorative practices? With examples, discuss Different restorative approaches and their suitability to conflict handling. Introduction: The most basic principles of restorative justice consist of voluntariness, respect, confidentiality, all-inclusiveness, participation, accountability, flexibility and responsibility.…

    • 2952 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution
    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Punishment: Utility vs. Retribution

    The practice of punishment is part of our society and functions to maintain social order. However, there are a couple different view points regarding how to appropriately carry out punishment. Retribution and Utilitarianism are two philosophies that have very different views on the theory of punishment.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Retributive, Utilitarian and Rehabilitative Justice Compared
    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Retributive, Utilitarian and Rehabilitative Justice Compared

    The three justice theories or views, which include utilitarianism, rehabilitative or a retributive style of justice, are multifaceted. It is not easy to sum the aspects of each without lengthy discussion. Therefore, I will try to maximize my efforts and offer concise answers. It is fair to note that my belief system correlates strongly with retributive style justice theory. Nevertheless, I will compare all three theories accordingly.…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Retributive Justice vs. Restorative Justice

    This paper will focus on retributive justice and restorative justice. Let’s begin with the definition of each. Retributive justice is a theory of justice that considers that punishment, if proportionate, is a morally acceptable response to crime. On the other hand, restorative justice is the opposite. It is a theory of justice that focuses on the needs of the victims and the offenders. So which of these should be morally right?…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Punishment Research Paper
    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Punishment Research Paper

    By definition, retribution can mean an act with a moral vengeance on how society will make an offender suffer the same amount of suffering as the crime itself. Retribution has been playing a role in society since the beginning of the bible. In the middle ages, crime was considered an offense onto society and to God. Back then crime was an upset to society’s original order as a whole. This is how society got the idea that the crimes committed should have a punishment equal to the amount of sufferance do to the crime. This way of punishing is still being used today by the justice system.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Justice Theories
    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Criminal Justice Theories

    Restitution (Compensation Theory) can satisfy both the Retributivist and Utilitarian Theories. With retributivist it takes in to the thought of not only the deserts of the criminal but also the victim. Restitution gives retributivist the ability to avoid criticism of punishment for punishments sake. When it comes to utilitarian, they see it as bringing about the possibility of more good consequences than locking up criminals for the rest of their…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Criminal Law Purpose
    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Criminal Law Purpose

    Originally retribution was understood as methods of vengeance and revenge, dealt with in villages or between just the victim’s family and offender’s family in private matter. These matters usually (depending on the severity) settled with compensation of money or asset (Johnstone and Ward 2010, 30-32). With the rise of the Crown’s involvement and criminal law institutions, the understanding of private matters transitioned into a state-controlled matter with set solutions for offences. This, in turn, introduced this notion of public retribution dealt with by the state (Johnstone and Ward 2010, 35-36). In today’s society victims receive retribution in the way of their offenders being punished for their wrongdoings i.e. through incarceration or community services and in some cases through money compensation (Konigs 2013). Retribution is seen as a non-instrumental purpose of criminal law as it is protecting society from itself through a system of public justice i.e. keeping people from seeking out revenge/retaliation and beginning a cycle of violence (Daly 2012, 389-390). In regards to the importance of retribution to criminal law, without some form of retribution, people would result back to the notion of vengeance and take matters into their own hands (Carlsmith 2006). Additionally, if there is no appropriate form of retribution, victims and the wider…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Restorative And Retributive Justice
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    Restorative And Retributive Justice

    In the light of the categories of restorative and retributive justice, I have described the ways in which Jesus engages with perceived offenders. I have argued that Jesus’s approach to offenders is that of restoration in the face of brokenness and alienation. The essential message of the gospel reports of the good news of the kingdom with a predominant theme of love, redemption, and salvation. The embodiment of that in expression was Jesus a witness of God’s love for humanity, a witness that intonation is on the brokenness of the offender. The engagement with offenders was that of embedded in his message.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The Utilitarian Theory Of Punishment
    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is The Utilitarian Theory Of Punishment

    The underlying principle of utilitarian theory is it seeks to punish offenders to discourage or deter future unlawful activity. However, the retributive theory seeks to punish offenders because they deserve to be punished (Net Industries, 2014). The utilitarian theory recognizes that punishment has penalties for both the offender and society. It holds that the total good created by the punishment should go beyond the entirety of evil; meaning punishment should not be unlimited. For example, releasing of an inmate who has a debilitating illness is considered consequentialism in punishment.…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Punishment Vs Retributive Justice
    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Punishment Vs Retributive Justice

    Retributive justice is when you violate the rights of another; then you should be penalized. These punishments restore order in the community. When offenders not getting punished, then there is an unbalance in society and guilt is now placed on the policy makers. Retributive justice becomes an issue when the individual committing the offenses is a victim as well. This person has been affected by outside entities, therefore lacks moral fiber, and will not endanger the rest of the community. Utilitarian justification has been the model for the American justice system for the most of the twentieth century. It utilizes different strategies for punishment, one being general deterrence. The knowledge of the penalty to follow the crime will reduce the violations. Individuals observed the consequences through another offender, who has committed a violation of rules and therefore are not interested in criminal…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Value Of American Values
    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Value Of American Values

    First, justice is similar to the idea of fairness. This means there are consequences for both good and bad. If a person does something good, they should be rewarded. If a person commits a crime, then they may end…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    A Theory of Justice
    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages

    A Theory of Justice

    In society, there is no greater question or importance than the relationship between the state and that of an individual. John Rawls directly addresses the issue in his famous work “A Theory of Justice”, in which he offers a comprehensive argument for an active welfare state. Rawls offers a framework based in the context of social contract theory that appears both logical and egalitarian; his conclusions appeal to both intuition and reason almost undeniably. This essay will discuss that Rawls principles conflict on the freedom of an individual and will argue that the relationship of individual liberty outweighs the importance of social equality.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics