Preview

To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-1914

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1040 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906-1914
Mollie Bentley –Rowe

To what extent did Russia undergo economic and political reform in the years 1906 – 1914?

Russia underwent economic and political reform to a limited extent. Although Peter Stolypin was pushing for reform, he was undermined by the mindsets of peasants and the fundamental law.

From the years 1906 – 1914, Peter Stolypin was pushing to de – revolutionise the peasantry and put into place economic reform, and there is evidence of this working. During these years large amounts of agricultural reform were set in motion. In 1906 45.9 million tonnes of agricultural production was produced, by 1913 this had grown significantly to 61.7 million tonnes. The massive change in the amount of product shows that agricultural and therefore economic reform had taken place. Farmers, at this time, had also started paying higher taxes, which is sign of higher income, again strengthening this idea of economic reform occurring. Stolypin, however successful he was in his endeavours, was pushing fiercely for a more independent and de-revolutionised peasantry. During November 1906, huge action was taken to change the way the peasants lived. They were freed from the constraints of commune control and land banks were set up to give money to those peasants who chose to leave. Many were also encouraged to move to Siberia, all of these reforms were starting to lay a foundation for a more independent peasantry. Economic reform was being pursued desperately by members of the government such as Stolypin, this can been seen by the copious amount of law, for example peasants leaving commune control, being put into place. The fact these laws were coming about shows that Russia was undergoing economic reform to some extent during this period, whether it was successful or not.

Much like economic reform, during this time frame, the government also showed signs that they were undergoing change. The fundamental law of 1906 shows that political reform was definitely

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Tsarism thrived for hundreds of years but as Russians became more educated they decided that communism and a dictatorship was too harsh and after a few revolutions Tsarism was a thing from the past. In the years 1881 to 1905 many things changed in Russia for the better and for the worse.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bruce Lincoln, writing decades later in 1990, took a different look at the causes of the Great Reforms. The Crimean War was the catalyst that made it apparent that Russia had to reform to maintain her status internationally. Serfdom impeded the military and the industrial side of modern warfare because it did not have a proper labor force for it. He argues that giving millions of peasants their freedom scared the autocracy and the nobles. Lincoln highlights the efforts of “enlightened bureaucrats who believed that serfdom was a moral blight on Russia as well as a impeding her development that pushed for the reforms.” Following the death of Tsar Nicholas I these enlightened bureaucrats took advantage of Alexander II’s attention to public opinion…

    • 193 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The torpor of the Russian economy compared to other European Great Powers was a prominent predicament to both Alexander III and Nicholas II. In order to sustain Russia’s Great Power status, both Tsars engaged in a policy of economic renewal between the years 1881 and 1095. Despite success in managing to proliferate economic growth rates, the attempts of economic reform between 1881 and 1905 weren’t sufficient in order to make Russia’s economy strong enough to fully maintain Russia’s ‘Great Power’ status as Russia still lagged behind the other Great Powers come 1905. (92)…

    • 756 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Examining textbooks printed prior to 1991 helps to define the differences that arose in theories of the causes, process, and outcomes of the reforms. Hugh Seton-Watson’s textbook The Russian Empire 1801-1917 published in 1967 devotes a chapter to the topic of the reforms. He argues that one of the problems that determined the reforms’ outcome was Alexander II’s own conflicting philosophies and the contradictory liberal and conservative influences that surrounded him. Therefore the reforms did not go fare enough because of these conflicting influences on the state’s design of the reforms. He theorizes that this is why “the 1861 settlement was no solution to the peasant question: it created more problems than it solved, and difficulties piled…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even thought there were problems with Witte's approach to development is not to deny that Russia needed major reform. Its defeat by Western powers in the Crimean War (1853-1856), lack of industrial development, poor infrastructure, left it much weaker than its competitors in Europe.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While in theory , the manner in which Russia was ruled undertook a considerable overhaul following the 1917 revolution . In reality the Country was governed with the Tsar and general security remaining as the ultimate authority with no real development occurring. Methods of oppression , propaganda and abusing civil rights were paramount in the rulings of all of the leaders be it Tsar or Communist. The largest change in the way in which Russia was ruled can be seen in the changing economy moving from open trade in the 1800's to the strict state capitalism of the 1900's. However few reforms had a direct impact in the way Russia was ruled thus meaning there was more continuity than change in the period 1855 to 1964.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the period from 1906-1914 Russia had appeared to have stabilised due to the social reforms brought in by Stolypin. However this only really created the illusion of stability due to many underlying problems that led to the 1905 revolution not being dealt with, therefore Russia had stabilised very little in this period which in turn would lead to further unrest in the future.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the concluding decades of the 19th century, Russia was a great country. She was vast and wrapped up in mystery. Despite being seemingly great, there were many problems facing the Tsar’s of Russia. These came in the form of political, economic and social issues; some of which slotted into more than one category.…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period previous to 1906 was one of great instability in Russia, 1905 saw a failed revolution after long term tensions. Stolypin was effective yet ruthless in his peasant control in the 1905 revolution and due to this he soon became chairman of ministers in 1906. He introduced many new policies in an attempt to stabilise Russia, though as to if these were effective remains debatable. Stabilising Russia would surely mean a stronger economy, few or no uprisings, modernised methods in both government and agriculture and workers in towns and the country would see an improvement to their lives.…

    • 1292 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1905 Revolution was significant to Russian government in long run but not in short run. After investigating into the contemporary sources which focus on different people’s opinions towards the Revolution and changes brought about by it, I found that there were general agreements on the following views. Firstly, the 1905 Revolution did brought changes to the practice of Russian government; however, as it did not bring an end to the autocratic regime in Russia, the short term the effects of the Revolution was not significant. In long run, the Revolution significantly aroused people’s anger towards the Tsar, and we can even argue that it provoked the 1917 Revolution, and arguably, it changed the whole system of government and political structure of Russia, so the long term significance of the revolution to Russian government was more remarkable. Secondly, we could doubt the effects of the Revolution on Russian society. It brought freedom to the people through the October Manifesto, but it is questionable whether it changed the Russians’ life significantly.…

    • 2790 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia in the 19th and 20th century faced economic collapses along with inflation which would test the nation’s and the people’s patience towards coming sufferings. The increasing population of Russia outlined a new milestone for the empire. A population increase demanded more from the economy and required a higher order of thought to please the entire nation. However, Russia and the Tsar were not ready for such expansion in population and backward views on society only provided another…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stolypin enabled for peasants to leave their Mir without needing consent first which again gave the peasants a sense of freedom and independence to build up their own consolidated farms. He also declared an end to the redistribution of land as the population was growing rapidly from 133 million to 161 million from 1900-1910; the land was made hereditary property of the head of the family as landholdings had been extended. By these reforms, Stolypin had hoped to create a new class of well-to-do peasants which he called his “Bet on the sober and strong”. The idea of all his reforms was so that the peasants would be and able and try new agricultural techniques and grow what they wished and how they did it which would improve their land. Stolypin believed that these new independent famers would provide stable support for the imperial government. His policies saw…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Essay

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The internal and external influences on the Russian class structure along with the failure of the tsarist regime left the country powerless to prevent revolutionary forces from developing or expanding. The advancing social awareness, literacy, and desire for land rights by the peasant class were an overwhelming and underestimated influences by the intelligentsia, provisional government and the tsarist regime. These described cultural changes and leadership failures, coupled with an the paralysis of the empires industrial and political system, along with a floundering, underfunded and unequipped mutinous military was a recipe for certain disaster.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays