Preview

To What Extent Did Witte Make Russia A More Stable Country

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
667 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
To What Extent Did Witte Make Russia A More Stable Country
To what extent did industrial development under Witte make Russia a more stable and prosperous country?
Even thought there were problems with Witte's approach to development is not to deny that Russia needed major reform. Its defeat by Western powers in the Crimean War (1853-1856), lack of industrial development, poor infrastructure, left it much weaker than its competitors in Europe.
As finance minister, Witte pushed for greater exports, ambitious industrialisation and to get large foreign loans. With these policies he hoped to make Russia a more competitive with the rest of Europe. His plans for Russia's economic development, which, though ambitious and in some ways successful, created new ones, which created long-term implications for
…show more content…
Once these loans were secured by Witte the county enjoy impressive economic growth, a healthy pace of modernisation as well as other aspects of modernisation within Russia. As by 1900 Witte had seen his ambitious industrialisation start to work from a Russian point of view as industrial production had increased significantly from 1880 to 1900 with coal output 5x higher from 3,290 to 16,160 (thousand tons), petroleum export increased 30x from 382 to 10,684 (thousand ton). Also the railways within 15 years had increase from 5,800km to 59,616km. However Russia failed to recognise is that these loans where short term to strengthen Russia military for the expected world war that was going to happen, which was one of the reason for French and British funding as at they saw Russia as the weak link in their plan if war was to breakout. They also failed to recognise that by taking out large foreign loans made the Russian market vulnerable as if the French economy was to faultier it would mean the end of the loans it needed. Which it did at the end of world war 1 as the French economy was facing major challenges, and its own war effort quickly consumed investment capital that would otherwise have been loaned to Russia to cover the nearly 40% of Russian public debt it was covering stopped. This shows that even though Witte was in the short term successful with foreign

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Russia economy in terms of industry fluctuated over the period from 1855-1964. It is key to note that under all the leaders, industrialisation and modernisation was always seen as an essential economic aim. Under Alexander II, with Reutern as his Minister of finance who adopted an approach that revolved around continued railway construction, attraction of foreign expertise and foreign investment capital. As a result modernisation and expansion occurred within the staples as well as newer industries which show the impact that alexander II made on industry. Reutern achieved a sevenfold increase in the amount of railway and the capacity of railway to carry break bulk at speed increased which gave a major boost to industrial output Russia seemed to be finally moving towards industrialisation and keeping up with the West. This approach was similar under Nicolas II who also managed to have a great impact on Russia’s industrial economy. This was through the work of Sergei Witte whom at the time of his appointment the Russian economy still resolved predominantly around agricultural production further showing that under Alexander II impacts was limited. Witte continued the idea of foreign expertise as well as taking out foreign loans, raising taxes and interest rates to boost available…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crimean war had highlighted the inadequacies in the Russian military. An example of this would be the lack of war materiel, such as rifles. The Crimean conflict had gone from bad to worse for the Russian military. The largely serf conscript army of the Empire, was poorly trained and poorly disciplined, this led to a number of mass desertions from the battle grounds, with almost The siege of Sevastopol was a sad and crippling defeat for the Russian empire, losing more than a 5th of its forces in the region. Alexander saw this as a triumph for the free troops of Britain and France, and a humiliating defeat for his conscripted and enslaved army. The Crimean war had also led to the eventual realisation that technological inferiority on the side of the Russians led to their defeat, The minister, Dmitri Milyutin, is described as stating quite bluntly, that “Russia must modernise, and it must build railways”. This is also a reference to the multitude of supply problems endured by the military, due to the lack of sufficient infrastructure such as railways. This makes the Crimean war a contributing factor to the Emancipation of the serfs, which defined Alexander II as a reformer.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    2. A move to industrialization was part of the process of change. In Russia, state support was vital, because it lacked a middle class and capital. A railway system was created in the 1870s. It reached the Pacific in the 1880s. Siberia was opened to development and increased Russian involvement in Asia. Under Count Wittle, the government passed…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    in large part to Russia 's modernization and her integration into Europe 's economic and…

    • 3006 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Crimean war was fought by Russia and an alliance of Britain, France, Prussia, Austria and the Ottoman Empire from 1853 to 1856. Due to the decline of the Ottoman Empire, each country was competing for influence in the Middle East, with Russia attempting to gain access to its seas. In the end Russia was vastly overpowered, leading Alexander II to speedily begin peace talks, the Treaty of Paris bringing an end to the bloodshed. The defeat of the war highlighted the fact that Russia had lost its dominance as a military power, having had its warships banned from the Black Sea. Why such a vast country with a strong military tradition lost was due to the traditional values of Russia, like the out-dated military manoeuvres, the out-dated bayonet against the newest rifles, the inability to support the war effort and the undersupplied armies due to a lack of transport. Russian troops weren’t equipped to fight against the advanced weapons of the French and British, when their ammunition ran out they were unable to restock since there was no form of transport other than ox drawn carts. Proof of Russian backwardness was exemplified here; Russia’s serfdom based economy was unable to support the cost of the war, influencing Alexander II greatly to change.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the 1905 revolution Russia was in need of reforms both economically and politically, to allow it maintain its role of a great power and to prevent another revolution occurring the answer to this was the October Manifesto. However, due to the stubbornness of the Tsar who was determined not to relinquish his autocratic powers, what may have appeared as reforms were largely superficial making little change in particular to the Russian political system.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia, under the reign of the young Tsar Peter, was westernized and modernized almost in the wink of an eye. Peter the Great visited Europe, and worked hard to learn and bring back every bit of technology and wisdom possessed by the western part of the world. Throughout his reign he brought Russia up from the proverbial dumps, and placed it among the world powers throughout the known world. Not only did he use his intelligence and determination to put Russia in this position, but also his natural ability to command and lead armies into battle.…

    • 438 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    27

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages

    question for the Russians was whether or not they could grow their economic gains while…

    • 610 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The last years of imperial Russia were characterized by a paradox. Externally, Russia appeared very strong. There had been substantial growth economically and her military force was large. But internally,…

    • 3824 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1964 Russia was seen as a leading superpower which dominated Eastern Europe. However this is a vastly different image than the inherently backward country that Russia was deemed to be one hundred years earlier. The most crucial turning point in the modernisation of Russia was the abdication of the Tsar in 1917 and the rise of the Bolshevik party which followed. Political modernisation, and more importantly a strong central government, was pivotal in allowing other Russian sectors, such as industry and agriculture to modernise. The First World War itself was not the key turning point as individually it did not greatly modernise Russia, however it can be seen as the catalyst for the political modernisation which was vital for the modernisation of Russia.…

    • 1981 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Catherine the Great tried various things in an effort to westernize the isolated territory. By late…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ss notes

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    TIME LINE 1855-1881 Alexander II established the zemstvos: a form of local self government First Russian westernization attempt 1861- Emancipation of Serf: was incomplete serfs were left to pay for their land… redemption payments Mir: village community 1863-1864 reforms of law, education and local government 1881 Alexander II assassinated 1881-1894 Alexander III instituted an era of repression and reaction denounced democracy, free press blood revolution police force Okharana 1891 famine • crops failed and there were no reserves; Russia had great famine The Witte System: Railroads, Industry, Tax the Peasants He wanted to expand Russian industry and develop its economy Building railroads will stimulate the growth of other industries Results of Witte System: o Growth of industry at 8% per year…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I believe that one of the main reasons for the Tsar’s abdication and the collapse of the Romanov rule was the poor state which Russia was in. Russia’s economy was at the worst it had ever been. The economy was far worse than other countries in the War. There were millions of peasants in Russia who had very limited amount of money. With such a limited amount of money, many peasants were unable to buy food, and drink to help them to survive. Peasants believed that they weren’t getting rewarded fairly for the work which they were doing. The upper classes’ benefit greatly due to work done by the Peasants. This created a negative atmosphere around Russia and helped fuel the need for a change. Peasants wanted change; they wanted to be rewarded more for their efforts at work. Russia was in an economic crisis. They had borrowed a huge amount of money from capital countries in order to fuel Russia’s war effort. This was a problem for Russia because they simply didn’t have the money to repay these countries. During the war the country had suffered inflation. Prices had risen dramatically for everyday items such as bread. The country was suffering and the Russian people’s families were dyeing in a war which wasn’t being funded. The Russian people were bound to be discontent and they only had one person to blame and that was the Tsar.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics