Preview

The Great Reforms Bruce Lincoln Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Great Reforms Bruce Lincoln Summary
Bruce Lincoln, writing decades later in 1990, took a different look at the causes of the Great Reforms. The Crimean War was the catalyst that made it apparent that Russia had to reform to maintain her status internationally. Serfdom impeded the military and the industrial side of modern warfare because it did not have a proper labor force for it. He argues that giving millions of peasants their freedom scared the autocracy and the nobles. Lincoln highlights the efforts of “enlightened bureaucrats who believed that serfdom was a moral blight on Russia as well as a impeding her development that pushed for the reforms.” Following the death of Tsar Nicholas I these enlightened bureaucrats took advantage of Alexander II’s attention to public opinion

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    However, there was increasing criticism of the institution of serfdom. The Russian empire had, since the reign of Ivan III, been a largely serf based rural nation. 85% of the populations at this time were peasants and most of those, serfs. A serf was someone who was owned by the Land lord, usually a member of the nobility, the serf would work there land until there death, with very little freedoms and certainly no education.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After the war in 1856 Nicholas's son Alexander II decided to move Russia toward modern needs and social changes. Alexander believed that his reforms would allow Russia to compete with western Europe for world power. The first of Alexander's reform was an official order for freeing the serfs in 1861. However, putting an end to serfdom only went halfway. Instead of individual peasants, peasant communities were given about half the farmland in the country, nobles kept the other half and the government paid the wealthy people for their land. However, each peasant community had 49 years to pay the government for the land it had received. Therefore, while the serfs were legally free the money that was owed still tied them to the land. Political and…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In July 1918, the royal Romanov line was suddenly and brutally ended by the Bolsheviks. The Romanov family had ruled the Russian Empire for over three centuries. The Romanovs reign was one of strict tyranny. Tsar Nicholas II of Russia made one big step toward a more equal Russia by freeing the serfs but because the serfs owned no land they had little to no money still. After WWI when nicholas led Russia to a crushing defeat there was lots of unrest throughout Russia. I think that the main reason the Tsar was forced to abdicate the throne and then was slaughtered is that he made a more equal Russia but in doing so he made the serfs more impoverished than ever, that he had led Russia into multiple wars that had ended badly and that the technology…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Throughout this time period the ruling elite, who made up 1.1% of the population despite owning 25% of the land, maintained constant support of the Tsar. This support was based on reliance in the Tsars rule in order to ensure their own aristocracy. The nobles controlled the land Therefore through the nobility’s control of land and as a result the means of production, the Tsar had autocratic power over the majority who worked this land; the peasants, both of state (32.7%) and through the nobility 50.7% as despite the emancipation of serfs in 1861 the lives of these peasants were heavily restricted and reliant on the land owners through the Mir, censorship, tax and redemption payments, of which many could not pay for and so were forced into debt. the peasants themselves, being both restricted in the Mir and due to their traditional attitudes and acceptance of social situation, what Marx would call a lack of revolutionary consciousness, can be attributed to the Tsarist survival.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author James M McPherson discerns Lincoln's character in the transfiguration shaped by the Civil War. This book “Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution”. Contains seven thoughtful chapters that explains the emancipation of countless slaves, also the rebellion of the community and governmental command of the South. The Civil War was the utmost changing and significant involvement in the history of United States of America, then Abraham Lincoln keeps being the greatest legend character.…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The autocratic rulership and repressive policies promoted the feudalistic style class system and prevented societal advancements throughout Russia. The world was entering a…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1750 and 1914, England, Germany, and Western Europe were all expanding. England was gaining land and trust in the Middle East, Germany was becoming an established nation, and Western Europe was thriving due to the Industrial Revolution. After recognizing all of this, Russia decided it was time for reform or be left in the dust. This caused major changes in Russia’s labor system such as emancipation of the serfs and industrialization to keep up with the changing world. Although they were going through these changes, there were continuities such as the treatment of the serfs and the type of reform they were doing.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He enacted reforms, changed the class system, and modernized his military,but he did so at a cost. Peter’s mission for westernization was more for himself than his people. Because of his needs and costly reforms the peasantry struggled. “ Peasants made up 97 percent of Russia’s population… they became tied down in a system bordering on slavery”( Sherman 406). They were forced to pay these taxes enacted by Peter with money they did not have. They were forced to be slaves for nobility, a concept that sets Russia back into the Medieval ages. Even though Peter the Great helped Russia into the modern world, at the cost of the peasants. Causing historians to question if Peter’s ends justified the…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Civil War, a war that had its origin in the issue of slavery, occurred from 1861 to 1865. In his book, Abraham Lincoln and the Second American Revolution, James M. McPherson considered the civil war as the Second American Revolution because of the changes it brought about in regards to slavery in the Unites States. In this event, revolution can be defined as the overthrowing of a current system of governing for a new and better system, what also happened on the First American Revolution. In the book, McPherson wrote that Charles A. Beard, one of the most influential American historians in the history, argued that the overthrow of slavery was an economic and capitalist revolution because the war happened as the result of a class conflict between a Yankee capitalist and a southern planter aristocracy.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) What do you think: “city upon a hill,” or “place of shadows” (Winthrop & Meacham, p. 39)? Do you think of the U.S. as a kind of Promised Land (p. 47)? Chapter 1…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lerone Bennett Jr. was wrong! “You can’t defend Abraham Lincoln without defending slavery.” Abraham Lincoln abolished slavery, he fought and stood for the slaves, and wanted slaves to be like everybody else. If Lincoln wasn’t president, then slavery might still be in play to this day. Abraham Lincoln changed America has a whole.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    unitisation of the left and right wing of the Duma and the apparent cooperation between the…

    • 896 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    All through time it has been said that Abraham Lincoln is one our country’s most recognizable leaders. Abraham Lincoln is one of the most known and beloved presidents in history. He was the 16th President of the United States and is well known for achieving feats such as keeping the Union together and accomplishing the emancipation of slavery. Lincoln had countless supporters as well as defiance and protection all along the American Civil War. Lincoln showed fortitude and never gave up on his vision and goals. Thus, subsequently battling for years, Lincoln was able to deliver freedom and support to those who were chained by weights of racism and prejudice. Abraham Lincoln had characteristics of leadership such as the ability to communicate…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays