Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

nuclear weapons

Good Essays
704 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
nuclear weapons
RELIGION ESSAY
Nuclear weapons are the only type of weapon in existence that have the capacity to annihilate the human species and countless other species. Weapons are a problem with the catholic tradition as they go against the catholic virtue of peace and should be banned. The catholic virtue of peace is completely thrown away when it comes to nuclear weapons as they show anger and violent towards people and that’s not what it is about. If nuclear weapons were to be banned it would prevent death, avoid war and also reduce the risk of terrorism towards countries. i will also talk about the pros and cons of nuclear weapons.
War is one of the biggest problems in the world today. Nuclear weapons add a even bigger threat when it comes to the word war. Not knowing what can come next can be the biggest fear. The just war theory explains that if one is to go to war it must comply with the philosophical, religious or political criteria. Which means they need to take into mind the innocents of people that have not done wrong. The priority is to protect the innocent lives, which can be hard to do when a nuclear bomb is set off. The banning of nuclear bombs would support the catholic virtue as it is less violent and anger shown and also with the just war theory as it is still thinking of the innocents of the people around those who have sinned and made mistakes. Getting rid of Nuclear weapons can lead to less harmful wars and hopefully lead to no wars at all as it says in the just war theory war should be a last resolution you should try to Find peace and justice before rather then after all the horrible conflict that can lead to the tragedy of nuclear weapons.
Furthermore the threat of terrorism with use of nuclear weapons can be horrifying to think that a something so big can be destroyed in seconds with the use of one evil weapon. Banning these weapons can be good and bad in a sense. The good in banning them is that there is no more threat of it happing and the world be a more peaceful sacred place to be. But the bad being that is there going to be someone out there that is willing to make more nuclear weapons to be used against the law and used in the act of terrorism. This is where trust can be brought in and can show that not everyone may agree with this as if terrorist are able to get there hands on them illegally what is the rest of the world meant to come back with. Nuclear terrorism goes against the catholic virtue again as it shows violence towards innocent people that have done nothing wrong and are doing it out of pure evil and not looking for peace and justice in life.
Banning nuclear weapons can have pros and cons. The pros being as listed above as it can prevent death, reduce the risk of terrorism. Banning the Nuclear weapons will go with the catholic virtue and the just war theory and get rid of the violence and anger shown towards innocent human beings. Where now there would be more peace in the world. The cons of banning is that radiation can be a cure of cancer if it is in the right hands but then if it gets into the wrong hands radiation can destroy cities in seconds. These weapons can be the saviour of mankind and can wipe out enemies and can be the answer to dealing with terrorism. But then the effects of nuclear weapons can be seen for decades after the more weapons that are made then the more risk there is towards humans. To keep a nuclear weapon safe costs lots of money from countries defence forces.
Thus this bring me to my conclusion on why nuclear bombs should be destroyed and the threat that they can show to mankind and how they go against all that is said in the just war theory and the catholic virtue about making a more peaceful and just place to live in.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Vacco Vs Quill Case Study

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages

    While the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia."…

    • 3200 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article, “The Day the Bomb Went Off,” Knoll and Postol argue nuclear bombs are catastrophic. The event of a nuclear attack would send humans back to the stone age, and put a halt on any technological advances. Furthermore, the effects of radiation would harm the population within a broad radius of a nuclear explosion. Readers may wonder what America would do under nuclear attack, and draw the conclusion nuclear bombs would destroy everything our society has accomplished.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    I clearly recognize that defensive systems have limitations and raise certain problems and ambiguities. If paired with offensive systems, they can be viewed as fostering an aggressive policy, and no one wants that. But with these considerations firmly in mind, I call upon the scientific community in our country, those who gave us nuclear weapons, to turn their great talents now to the cause of mankind and world peace, to give us the means of rendering these nuclear weapons impotent and obsolete.…

    • 5226 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many people think that nuclear power can provide low-cost energy which can easily substitute oil and the other common sources of energy. In addition to this, nuclear weapons are considered the only instrument which can make possible the maintenance of word peace. The nuclear problem is complex and difficult to analyze without any kind of prejudices. First of all, it is true that nuclear power can provide a huge amount of energy to every city in the world, but we also should consider…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people wonder about the future of the world as more powerful nuclear weapons are developed. The U.S. should learn from the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and discontinue the development and production of nuclear weapons because the bombs will create unforeseen damage, prompt other countries to produce…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nuclear bomb is dangerous and scary weapon that really should have never been thought of or invented. Nuclear bombs have been the focal point of every country's scientists ever since World War II when the U.S. dropped them on Japan. Just seeing the death and destruction a nuclear bomb can cause to people and the environment just proves my point. Not one person should have the power to just be able to push a button and have the ability to tear another country to shreds.…

    • 399 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Nuclear Weapons have strong mass destruction. For example, The United States sent "Little boy", a uranium gun-type fission bomb to Hiroshima, Japan. 3 days Later, The United States sent " Fat Man" in Nagasaki, Japan. More than 10,000 people died from these incidents. In my opinion, Nuclear Weapons didn't kill just people, but their family, their home and their dream.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the US created the bomb, the US president at the time, Harry Truman ordered the mass production of more bombs, incase anyone tried to attack in the midst of their newest invention, and to give America national dominance, especially towards the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Fortunately, the amount of atomic bombs kept in arsenal has gradually decreased over the years since World War II. In 2009 nine there were 23,574 nuclear weapons and in 2014 there were 16,300. (Atomic Bomb Update). Therefore, if the world is already cutting down on atomic bombs in storage on their own is it really necessary to outlaw them?…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a citizen from the U.S.A., I believe that we should not drop the bomb in Japan.The use of the bomb without warning is contrary to the position of the United States as a great humanitarian nation, especially since Japan seems close to surrender.More than 60 of its cities have been destroyed by conventional bombing, the home islands are being blockaded by the American Navy, and the Soviet Union entered the war by attacking Japanese troops in Manchuria. Even general Dwight Eisenhower said that the Japanese are soon to be surrender. A surprise use of the bomb would damage the respect that we have built up in the world community. It is morally wrong and will set a bad precedent in the future. Because such a weapon could lead to a proliferation of similar weapons that would threaten future generations. To use it now would be an international crime.The whole world will just become a nuclear world. We just ended a war with the most infamous Germans to fight for what we believed . If we drop the bomb, isn't it against our beliefs? Remember how France and Britain made the unfair treaty with Germans? A treaty that they believed would end all wars. However as history shows us , this is certainly not true because years later, the Germans rose again and this time brought a bigger war than the previous Great War. This is will certainly alarm us, because what if the Japanese follow in German footsteps and make a bigger war in the future? Not only that, but by dropping the bomb it also means that we see the Japanese as savages instead of humans. The Japanese are already defeated and ready to surrender. If the U.S.A. becomes the first to use this weapon, then we will have adopted the ethical standard of barbarians. Atomic weapons are similar to poison gas – both are barbaric.The U.S.A. should not shock the world with such a weapon.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Atomic Bomb

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Please use the website at the bottom to research the Seattle Times article. This will help you answer the questions below. You can type your answers in the textbox for the virtual tour or save your answers in a word document and upload it into the assignment.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    atomic bombing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The U.S. was the first country to use an atomic bomb on another country, and the U.S. is still the only country to have ever used an atomic bomb. The U.S. dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan on August 6, 1945 and dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan on August 9, 1945. 70,000 died instantly in Hiroshima and 80,000 died instantly in Nagasaki. Even though the U.S. destroyed many Japanese lives the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was the right decision. However dropping the second atomic bomb on Nagasaki was probably not necessary to get Japan surrender. The decision of using the atomic bomb was tough, but it saved many American lives, but the U.S. used the second atomic bomb way too quickly, with absolutely no thought to how much more destruction was done to the Japanese people.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    cold war and communism

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In conclusion both nuclear war and terrorism strikes fear in the hearts of everyone. Both are design to wreak havoc and will kill many innocent people who have nothing to do with the conflict. I feel both are unacceptable ways to fix a problem because how can the problem be fixed with more bloodshed. We have to find another way to resolve issues as a country and as people.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb

    • 917 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The former president, Harry Truman had to make one of the most crucial decisions of his life. On August 6, 1945 during World War II, he decided to drop the atomic bomb on two cities in Japan. The first bomb that dropped on Hiroshima was nicknamed “Little Boy”. The explosion wiped out 90 percent of the Hiroshima and immediately killed an estimation of 80,000 people; thousands more people would later die of radiation exposure. Three days later, a second bomb dropped another on the city of Nagasaki, it is estimated to have killed about 40,000 people. Although the bomb that was dropped on the city of Nagasaki was said to be more powerful than the first one, the terrain prevented them from more damages. Japan's Emperor Hirohito announced a surrender from the war on August 15, addressed on the radio. The two cities were ultimately chosen to be target because they were untouched during the war. Harry Truman’s decision is both unjustifiable and immoral.…

    • 917 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics