Preview

How The Atomic Bomb Has Changed The World

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How The Atomic Bomb Has Changed The World
In the midst of World War II the creation of nuclear weapons became a reality. After a long race between nations to figure out how to create a bomb, America won, with it’s elite team of scientists including Robert Oppenheimer and many others. After Otto Hahn, a German Physicist, discovered nuclear fission in 1944, which lead to him receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, the Manhattan Project was able to be a success. With this new power America was finally was finally able to end the war by bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Not only did the creation of the atomic bomb greatly impact Japan, it has changed the world in many other ways. It has also raised a lot of questions regarding political decisions and policies, such as is it possible for us to outlaw …show more content…
After the US created the bomb, the US president at the time, Harry Truman ordered the mass production of more bombs, incase anyone tried to attack in the midst of their newest invention, and to give America national dominance, especially towards the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Fortunately, the amount of atomic bombs kept in arsenal has gradually decreased over the years since World War II. In 2009 nine there were 23,574 nuclear weapons and in 2014 there were 16,300. (Atomic Bomb Update). Therefore, if the world is already cutting down on atomic bombs in storage on their own is it really necessary to outlaw them? No, and with the amount of nations that have nuclear weapons and technology advancements they can easily be created and …show more content…
It is extremely possible that the time comes that it is necessary for a nation to drop a bomb. In fact, in April, the U.S. dropped their most powerful non-nuclear bomb on Afghanistan. (CNN Politics) Hence, atomic weapons still aren’t being used, so, what will it take in order for them to be used. According to The Manhattan Project and the Decision to Drop the Bomb, “President Truman faced a monumental decision about whether to use the bomb. His final decision was based upon the overwhelming desire to save American lives and to bring the war to a speedy conclusion.”. That’s exactly the position a nation, at least America, needs to be put in, in order to use atomic

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Perhaps and this is a hypothetical conjecture but it has to be remembered there was intense scientific interest in nuclear power and destruction. All the military powers had held investigations and Germany came very close to developing this capacity. The USA through the top secret ‘Manhattan Project’ developed this weapon and it was so secret that when President Roosevelt died in office his successor (Harry Truman) only became aware of the project then. Then arose the problem of the Soviet Union entering the war against Japan on the 8th of August 1995 [5], the Soviets were quickly becoming a super power. The alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union during World War II developed out of necessity, and out of a shared realisation that each country needed the other to defeat Germany and the Axis. They had the common goal of defeating fascism but as that goal was achieved the Soviet Union and USA had no uniting cause. There had already been small amounts of tension with Soviet soldiers working alongside American soldiers in the war and now there large attack on Japan threatened the world with more communism which Americans disliked. So, a new president and the new problem of an emerging super power of the Soviet Union entering the war in Asia could have been a catalyst to use atomic weapons. Not only did it conclude the war but it also demonstrated to the Soviets the USA’s…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It would have turned into a global war. Hundreds of thousands of americans would have been killed. Truman and his advisors made the only decision they had. The decision to drop the bomb was not just “a simple yes.” For Truman, the choice if he was going to use the atom bomb or not was the hardest choice of his life.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dropping the atomic bomb will solve nearly every problem we have. It would force the Japanese to surrender, shorten the war, save lives and money, and avoid us from asking the Soviet Union to get involved. The atomic bomb is already built, and not using it would waste all the money and time put into developing it. Releasing the bomb on Japan really would be in the best interest of the United States.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wars have occurred for various different reasons all around the world, each nation involved using their best means of defensive and offensive attacks. Weaponry has been updated as time went on, leading us from arrows and bows to powerful guns. In the 1940s during World War II, however, one weapon in particular left a huge impact. The United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II was not justified due to the fact that it was ethically wrong, an excessive use of force, and unnecessary.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb DBQ

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many Americans argued that the use of the atomic bomb could cause problems with our allies and enemies. If the bomb got in the wrong hands, people would be at danger. This is similar to how Kim Jong-un is consistently threatening the United States with an atomic bomb attack. One could argue that the use of the atomic bomb was a way for the United States to intimidate the Soviet Union, and show how powerful we are. However, it is clear that the United States bombed Hiroshima, to make them…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the atomic bomb must face a questioning of morals then so should all other weapons of destruction. For example, incendiary bombs used in World War II also had detrimental effects. 80,000-100,000 people were killed and more injured in a bombing raid on Tokyo that used incendiary bombs (Kagan, 9). This also left hundreds of thousands homeless by the destruction of more than 250,000 buildings (Kagan, 9). Clearly the atomic bomb is not in a class of its own when it comes to complete devastation. If one is to label one type of weapon as “inhumane” or “heartless” then all weapons must fall under the same scrutiny. In that case, war itself must be outlawed which, considering the current situation, is not an option. The current power of atomic bombs is not great enough to justify its prohibition, but maybe in the future they will become so powerful that they MUST be…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning Nuclear Weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace in this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The effects of the atomic bomb might not have been the exact effects that the United States was looking for when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively (Grant, 1998). The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    For the most part, I generally don’t consider the presence of nuclear weapons in the world, but if a real tragic life event occurs by using an atomic bomb, I find it to be very important and dangerous. As for the book, “Bomb” by Steve Sheinkin, the author describes an atomic bomb to be the “most powerful bomb ever built” (Sheinkin 15). The Americans go through great lengths to achieve all the necessary ingredients to build an atomic bomb, such as finding “Germany’s entire supply of uranium” and sending this main ingredient to the United States. With this in mind, if the United States were able to go to great lengths for a bomb, what wouldn’t make other countries do the same? As for this, many people should be cautious if two countries start…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dropping the Atomic Bomb is not necessary for many reasons such as the following. The Ground and Naval wars are progressing strongly and also Japan is already on defense. The ground war is doing very well and has worked for us so far so why not continue. Some may say that the mountainous region of Japan could lead to the death of many American soldiers but the Japanese soldiers would have many fatalities so it would even out instead of just killing many innocent Japanese. The Naval war was making progress by taking over Japanese islands in the pacific. This way the US would be better off not dropping the atomic bombs.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether it be the morality of it’s use at that particular moment or the modern use of the weaponry, there is always going to be something regarding these bombs. However, in this particular discussion, it could be seen that the bomb was projected as being a means to end the war quickly in an effort to save American lives. But the use of information at the time shows otherwise as there was a strong pressure to use to the nuclear weapon in an effort to not only limit the Soviet Union's involvement in Japan but begin a focus on what they were doing in Europe. This potentially prevented the Soviet Union taking even more land in Europe and creating a large buffer zone in the case of invasion within that…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that dropping the atomic bomb was the wrong choice by president Truman. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed nearly a quarter million people combined. These deaths were not all instantaneous, although many of them were. Some of them died more slowly -from the residual radiation and burns. These horrible effects are not -in my opinion- justified by the fact that it brought an end to the war. Neither is the fact that it brought atomic warfare into the public eye, and into the eyes of the world. It has become something people have sought after since then. I believe there are better things we could have done instead of dropping the bombs. One of these would be to surround the mainlands and cut off food and supplies getting…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason the US felt the need to drop the atomic bomb was because it was crucial for them to end this war once and for all. The atomic bombs would immediately put an end to all the brutal fighting and save millions of US and Japanese soldiers’ lives who were fighting in the war. For example, a US World War II soldier, Paul Russell, believed that…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1988 Dbq

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays