Preview

Why the United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb: Persuasive Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1259 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why the United States Dropped the Atomic Bomb: Persuasive Essay
The atomic bomb is the subject of much controversy. Since its first detonation in 1945, the entire world has heard the aftershocks of that blast. Issues concerning Nuclear Weapons sparked the Cold War. We also have the atomic bomb to thank for our relative peace in this time due to the fear of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The effects of the atomic bomb might not have been the exact effects that the United States was looking for when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki respectively (Grant, 1998). The original desire of the United States government when they dropped Little Boy and Fat Man on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not, in fact, the one more commonly known: that the two nuclear devices dropped upon Hiroshima and Nagasaki were detonated with the intention of bringing an end to the war with Japan, but instead to intimidate the Soviet Union. The fact of Japan's imminent defeat, the undeniable truth that relations with Russia were deteriorating, and competition for the division of Europe prove this without question.
<br>
<br>Admittedly, dropping the atomic bomb was a major factor in Japan's decision to accept the terms laid out at the Potsdam agreement otherwise known as unconditional surrender. The fact must be pointed out, however, that Japan had already been virtually defeated. (McInnis, 1945) Though the public did not know this, the allies, in fact, did. Through spies, they had learned that both Japan's foreign minister, Shigenori Togo and Emperor Hirohito both supported an end to the war (Grant, 1998). Even if they believed such reports to be false or inaccurate, the leaders of the United States also knew Japan's situation to be hopeless. Their casualties in defending the doomed island of Okinawa were a staggering 110,000 and the naval blockade which the allies had enforced whittled trade down to almost nothing. Japan was quickly on the path to destruction. (Grant, 1998). Of course, the Allies ignored this for the reason that



Bibliography: /b><ol><li>Claypool, Jane (1984). Turning Points of World War II: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Toronto: Grolier, 1984. <br><li>Legvold Robert. "The Cold War" Microsoft Encarta Encyclopedia. 1999 Edition. <br><li>McInnis, Edgar. (1946) The War: Sixth Year. Toronto: Oxford University Press <br><li>Grant, R.G. (1998) New Perspectives: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Austin: Raintree Steck-Vaughn</ol>

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    On August 6th, 1945, the United States dropped the first ever Atomic weapon on Hiroshima, Japan. 140,000 people lost their lives, most of which were civilians. President Truman was in charge of this major decision, and he made the correct choice. The alternative solutions were much too costly for the United States, both in expenses and American casualties. Another reason Truman’s decision is justified was due to the declination of the fair ultimatum recieved by Japan. Also it was important to the well being of the world to keep the Soviets out of Japan. Dropping the Atomic Bomb was the most reliable and definite way to end the war.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the summer of 1945 the United States was entering the final stages of World War II. One could assume that ending the war quickly was a priority. President Truman was demanding “unconditional surrender” from Japan. In a statement he released on May 8th, he described unconditional surrender as “Our blows will not cease until the Japanese military and naval forces lay down their arms in unconditional surrender. Just what does the unconditional surrender of the armed forces mean for the Japanese people? It means the end of the war. It means the termination of the influence of the military leaders who have brought Japan to the present brink of disaster.… Unconditional surrender does not mean the extermination or enslavement of the Japanese people. (Alperovitz, Gar (2010-12-29). The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb (p. 39).)” So if the war were to end the Japanese would have to unconditionally surrender, secretary of state James Byrnes said as much, “For instance, in his 1947 book Speaking Frankly, James F. Byrnes declared without qualification: “Had the Japanese Government listened to [Ambassador to Soviet Union] Sato and surrendered unconditionally, it would not have been necessary to drop the atomic bomb. (Alperovitz, p. 34)” The Japanese refused to surrender because of the terms they would be conceding to. They wanted a guarantee that their emperor would be protected and they felt unconditional surrender would put him in jeopardy. “The reality is that as the summer of 1945 progressed, most U.S. leaders fully realized that the only serious condition Japan’s leaders sought was an assurance that the Emperor would not be eliminated. (Alperovitz, p.34)” One could conclude that the atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because of Japan’s refusal to unconditionally surrender. There is also belief that the atomic bomb was dropped to intimidate the Soviet Union. As historian Barton Berstein put it, “The combat use…

    • 1235 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “On August 16, 1945, Enola Gray, a U.S. bomber, dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, and three days later, a second atomic bomb destroyed the city of Nagasaki” (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). Many people argue whether or not these bombings were ethical and legal. The U.S. killed innocent people in order to “break the morale” of the Japanese population. The U.S. also broke many of the statements in the “Just War” doctrine. Theses bombings caused many people to face harmful amounts of radiation and die. I believe that President Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bombs was unethical and he did not justify using nuclear weapons in order to get Japan to surrender.…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Atomic Bomb put a huge mark in American history. It changed the way war takes place and introduced the amass weapons of destruction to warfare. The destructive force also wiped out hundreds of thousands of people, mainly consisting of women and children. Many people were appalled by America’s immoral effort to end the war. Others disagreed and stated that it was a necessary evil to drop the atomic bomb and end the war. Even 70 years after World War II this argument continues of whether it was appropriate to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki. While dropping the atomic bomb was cruel and immoral, it was essential to ending the war in the Japanese Theatre of World War II, it established America as an even greater power, and it saved American lives.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the summer of 1945, the United States ravaged the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki with newly developed, top secret atomic bombs. In the many years following this event, arguments have transpired as to whether this action was ethical, and whether it was really necessary to end World War II quickly. However, due to the wartime situation and Japan’s extreme cruelty, the United States were predominantly justified in their decision to drop the atomic bombs. Dropping the atomic bombs in Japan was a strategic method to finish the Second World War, and to avenge the Japanese with minimal casualties.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The US propelled atomic weapons in the mornings of August sixth and August ninth of 1945 to Japan, producing a huge number of honest deads, without tallying the back ones caused by the radiation that was in the place. Atomic weapons are probably the most huge executing gadgets weapons that have ever existed. This weapon can burn people that are in the epicenter of the bomb and the spots encompassing it in not more than seconds. This weapon ought to be dispensed with from earth since it is a peril to the planet and people, a reality that is much more terrible than creating a few many years of "worldwide peace". Likewise, it is an unfeeling approach to murder a person, that is against to any sort of good esteem.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My eyes roamed across the room, scanning the faces of nearly one hundred of the world’s leading scientists as we all waited in anticipation. We listened to the tiny wooden box that was shaping the world. The Enola Gay prepared to drop the bomb that president Truman hoped would end the war. We listened as the plane approached the target site. A city of over 100,000 people. They would hear the bombers approaching and prepare for an attack -- hiding under desks or crouching in basements as they had been taught -- but there was no hiding from this one. As our lead scientist said when we tested the bomb, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” The countdown began. Everyone in the room tensed visibly; every muscle in every inch of our bodies humming with nervous energy.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If I could uninvent an invention, it would absolutely be the atomic bomb. Since its creation, the atomic bomb has caused many deaths that could have been avoided, innocent deaths that were targeted. The use of it is to only destroy; most can acknowledge the bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, during WWI. This invention had led to other inventions such as nuclear weapons which can also be very harmful. Countries are threatened by them, and they create conflict and disagreements between them. Albert Einstein had made an advance in chemistry, but sadly turned into a regret. Why are we so eager of peace when all we do is trigger war? The world would be a much better place without the invention of atomic bombs.…

    • 124 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    America's decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan was only done to assert our position over the Soviet Union, and Japan's surrender was only an extra accomplishment of the attack. During the years 1939 to 1947, numerous conferences were held to discuss diplomatic matters, and the strive towards getting Japan to accept an unconditional surrender. The Japanese had already been weakened, and the military predicted that they would eventually be forced to surrender in a short amount of time. Even the scientists who worked on the atomic bomb agreed that it was unnecessary to drop the bomb on Japan, since their surrender would be evident in the near future. Therefore, the United States' decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan had nothing to do with forcing the Japanese to surrender; it was only done to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Wwii

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages

    With no navy, no air force, their armies being beaten by the Chinese, their people at home starving to death, American bombers ruling their skies, an effective American sea blockade in place, Russia declaring war on them, and with martial law imposed, Japan was essentially defeated by August 1945. This is why prominent US military commanders including Dwight Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur, Chester Nimitz, William Leahy and Carl Spaatz were against the atomic bombs and a US invasion. They knew that both options were not needed when you look at Japan's situation. The atomic bombs were not militarily necessary to force Japan's unconditional surrender.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine waking up one morning in the hospital covered in burns and having no recollection of being in a fire and being told that many friends, family members, and neighbors are dead. Well this is what many people had to experience in the bombing of Hiroshima, Japan in 1945. On December 7th 1941 Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and as a result the US declared war. The US started to develop the atomic bomb, and ultimately bombed Hiroshima. The two perspectives that the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war and the atomic bomb wasn’t necessary to end the war will be addressed. Many people said that the bomb was a quick and effective way to end the war with minimum American lives lost, while others believe that is was a barbaric tactic that caused the death of many Japanese civilians.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb is a bomb that rapidly releases energy causing destructive damage through heat. The atomic bomb dropped on Japan was not needed it was an evil act and was unnecessary. It was undoubtedly not required to drop a 4-ton barbaric weapon that is equivalent to 5 million dollars on another country. The United States Military had already launched a sea blockade that consisted of a submarine campaign before the bomb was dropped. It was cutting food and supplies. Not only was it already beaten by seas. There was a massive amount of air attacks; the United States already had control of the Japanese air space before the atomic bomb. With Majority control of Japans airs the United States conducted many raids on Japan causing extensive destruction by dropping over tens of thousands pounds of bombs. This had already caused massive destruction to towns and cities. It was a race towards who could have the first atomic bomb. When The United States Successfully accomplished the bomb it was at first a way to initiate Japan into Surrendering but the second bomb was a way to show superiority towards the rest of the world that America is very powerful. The alternative is what could have happened if the bomb was not used? Japan was already getting dominated by sea and by air they were being isolated and not allowed resources it was only a matter of time till Japan could have surrendered. If the bombs were not used there would not be near as many deaths and utter destruction. But we cannot no for sure if Japan could have surrendered or not, and if they did not surrender what could have been lost? Many American troops would have lost their lives. But instead of a civilian loss it could have been a military loss. Japan was already dominated by the United States they were running out of resources and did not have long until rioting would have started the United States was a huge problem for Japan. They were surrounded. The only…

    • 1436 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb is a nuclear bomb that was used in the World War 2 and had a positive impact on both sides of the war. The U.S would save more soldier lives if they used the bomb, but if they were to invade Japan they would lose a huge amount of soldiers.The U.S warned Japan to surrender to help the lives of the Japanese people because the atomic bomb would abolish many lives that were in the city of Hiroshima. This shows the positive impact the atomic bomb had for the U.S and Japan. As a result, the bomb would be saving more American soldiers because it was estimated that if the U.S. were to physically invade Japan they would lose about half a million soldiers. President Truman decided to use the atomic bomb against Hiroshima because it would…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays