Should United States Make And Test Weapons Of Mass Destruction

The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws. The first reason to this argument is valid because nuclear weapons can kill millions of people and destroy everything. This is true because “environments of nature could be ruined”. Furthermore “future generations will have to deal with destruction and health complications”. This shows that nuclear weapons pose as a threat to the Earth and all living species. For all the reasons stated above the damage done in Hiroshima, shows proof of how harmful nuclear weapons are.
“Even if you pay all this money trying to help the nation, it can negatively affect the treasury and make things worse”.This evidence supports the thesis because It is a waste of money and is so much trouble , it can cost a political criticism.Lastly nuclear weapons cost millions and makes poorer nations invest because of the cost and maintenance.It is not a good