Gerald Graff Other Voices Other Rooms Analysis
Conflict is Needed In classrooms, conflict is necessary to achieve student abilities to devise their own perspective and form different judgement on a topic which helps gain knowledge. In the essay “Other Voices, Other Rooms, by Gerald Graff, a professor of English and education writes about “the chance to try on a variety of clashing ideas, to see what they feel like, is one of the most exciting opportunities an education can provide”, which is known as conflict in a classroom. While keeping a degree of pluralism and diversity between subject, teacher should have a level of communication when presenting material. The outcomes are rewarding for student who go to a “university with already developed skills. Conflict benefits
…show more content…
She states that "I treat everyone the same. But treating people the same is not equal treatment if they are not the same", but she didn’t display that throughout her class experiment(Tannen 349). For example, She broke the classroom into small groups to analyze the reading. The way she divides the class into groups is by “ the degree program they were in, gender, and conversational style (Tannen). That’s not treating everyone the same because she’s making exceptions for students. In that case, yes, she might be helping students get into their comfort zone to talk and learn, but might be hurting other students education. It’s obvious that people shouldn’t have equal treatment if they are not the same ,but people should have the same opportunity. For example, a teacher can’t treat a disable student the same as to an average student, but the teacher can support them with more help to have the same opportunities in class. For another example, a Japanese woman was the biggest talker in the class. Then she was to put into a small group where she didn’t do that well. She was “ overwhelmed by how talkative the female students were in the female-only group”(Tannen 348). Many students have different needs to participate, but a teacher can't satisfy everyone's needs. Treating everyone the same might be easier from a teacher perspective, but student with major needs should get it. That's why there Disabled Students Programs and Services in
She states that "I treat everyone the same. But treating people the same is not equal treatment if they are not the same", but she didn’t display that throughout her class experiment(Tannen 349). For example, She broke the classroom into small groups to analyze the reading. The way she divides the class into groups is by “ the degree program they were in, gender, and conversational style (Tannen). That’s not treating everyone the same because she’s making exceptions for students. In that case, yes, she might be helping students get into their comfort zone to talk and learn, but might be hurting other students education. It’s obvious that people shouldn’t have equal treatment if they are not the same ,but people should have the same opportunity. For example, a teacher can’t treat a disable student the same as to an average student, but the teacher can support them with more help to have the same opportunities in class. For another example, a Japanese woman was the biggest talker in the class. Then she was to put into a small group where she didn’t do that well. She was “ overwhelmed by how talkative the female students were in the female-only group”(Tannen 348). Many students have different needs to participate, but a teacher can't satisfy everyone's needs. Treating everyone the same might be easier from a teacher perspective, but student with major needs should get it. That's why there Disabled Students Programs and Services in