Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Animals Vs. Man

Good Essays
1273 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animals Vs. Man
Animal against Humans
Is the action happening towards animals in the laboratory cruelty or science? Animal experimentation has been a commonly debated subject for many years. There are two aspects for why animals’ testing is wrong. The first aspect is that these experiments would not necessarily work. The other aspect is that these experiments are morally wrong and doesn’t do us any good. Animals should not be used in laboratory experiments.
Animal research would not necessarily work. The benefits to human beings are not proven. Doctors might succeed trying a medicine on animals but it might not benefit human beings. According to the American Anti-VIVISETION Society who…… the results could be incorrect. An Animal reaction to a drug could be different to a human’s reaction, because humans and animals have different physiology, anatomy and, metabolism making it difficult to use data from animal’s experiments on humans. The experiments could be affected by the stress that they face in labs, resulting in meaningless experiments, in recent times animals are still being used to experiment products that are not as important as medical experiments such as cleaning products, also most drugs that succeed on animals fail in human clinical trials.
In an article by Rache Hajar, “Animal testing and Medicine”, the writer stated that there was a tragic drug fiasco occurred in the late 1950s-1960s, they found a drug for coughs, colds and headaches called “Thaildomide”. Unfortunately, more than 10,000 children were born with malformations or missing libs because a lot of pregnant women took the drug to relieve their pain. The writer also mentions that the drug should have been tested on animals before being used. According to a YouTube video “Animal Testing - Good Science? Or Pointless Cruelty?” Dr. Peter Simmons mentioned that the results of the studies of medicine on animals can’t be applied on humans because they are not predictive. The only way to find cures is through human based research or technology. Why do we do it then? It is a waste our time and a waste of their souls.
The video also gave perfect alternatives. The study on people, how do they live and their living conditions called “Epidemiology” in this study the doctors studied people who smoke cigarettes to know more about cancer instead of forcing animals to entail Tabaco smoke. There is another alternative study called “clinical studies” the study people who are ill and under treatment.
Animals are born to be free and live in earth exactly like us. Enough of them are dying and suffering in the wild, we don’t need to make them suffer more by doing the unimportant experiments so we can take advantage of them for our own personal benefit.
They should not be treated as objects. Although strict controls have been forced on animals’ experiments and researchers try to minimize the pain experienced by animals, suffering is inevitable as animals are prisoned in isolated cages and forces to suffer from diseases and injuries, We are forcing them and taking advantage of them for our own personal benefit. People do not obtain the right to experiment on animals and sacrifice their lives, many of these experiments cause pain and suffering to the animals involved or reduce their quality of life in other ways. They are suffering from the consequences of man’s actions by being placed under the risk of death and severe injuries.
If there was a more intelligent and a more developed species than human beings on earth would we approve being prisoned in cages in order for them to run experiments on us? Certainly not. And what if the weak creatures were forced them to take drugs and get under needles in the Laboratory experiments. Humans have more power. It’s something out of the will of animals and they are obviously fighting back and trying to get out of their cages. They can’t speak or express their opinions and emotions. We are forcing them and taking advantage of them for our own personal benefit.
Animals are creatures that have a moral compass, and feel emotions such as love, grief, outrage and empathy. Some humans do not see the emotion that comes out of an animal. Emotions exist in them whether we humans acknowledge it or not. If you look in their eyes or just observe them you can see that they get sad or happy and have different feelings as well. And because they have morality, we have moral obligations to them. We should give them their right of living in peace and harmony.
Some humans are gracious and kind, they are bothered when they hear that an animal was mistreated. Three years ago I saw some people that work with animals intentionally kill mice in a cruel way before feeding in to another animal. It is a sad fact that some men are enjoying torturing animals. Do you think men working in laboratories also are abusing animals? Men working in laboratories are surly stronger that animals, which means that they are in control of the animals under experimentations. Their job is to test on animals whether they are satisfied with that or not. They do it because of money, many workers in this competence benefit from it. It is sad that the laboratory workers are experimenting on animals and it affects their morality making them senseless creatures and in some cases they might hate what they’re doing so much that they might and not be comfortable in their lives and hate everything about it. This is related to what the works who killed the mice, the workers became cruel and senseless people through time.
According to Martin Luther King Jr. in “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, king fought for the rights of African Americans who were mistreated, they didn’t get their rights. Animals also should get their full rights of freedom and not being forced into being used as tools. King tried convincing people in his writing and proved his point of view by bringing up evidence from several religions that proves all people are equal. So people from all religion understand that animals and human beings should live together in harmony without human being harming them and using them in experiments. According to the BBC website in an article “animal rights", Modern Christian thinking is largely sympathetic to animals and less willing to accept that there is a gap or difference between animals and human beings. The prophet Isaiah describes the Kingdom of Heaven as a place where animals and human beings live together in peace ("automatic").
In Islam, mistreating an animal is considered a sin. The Quran and guidance from the Prophet Muhammad, as recorded in hadith. According to an article by Reza Gharebaghi1, Mohammad Reza Vaez Mahdavi2, Hasan Ghasemi3, Amir Dibaei4 and Fatemeh Heidary1 "Animal rights in Islam", Ali Ibn Abu T• alib (PBUH) says, "Be obedient to Allah regarding His subjects and the lands at your disposal, for you are responsible even for the survival of animals." And this means Islam tells Muslims that it is our responsibility to take care of the animals.
King said in his letter that one can’t sit and watch injustice happen. We must take action for what we are standing with. That is why we should speak for the animals in laboratories. The life of an animal is important to it as your life important to you. It doesn’t want to be caged, hurt and killed any more than you do. It isn’t a choice between animals and people; it is a choice between science and cruelty.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is all due to the simple fact that “animals of different ages, sexes, developmental stages and of different health status can all respond differently to experimental treatments.” (“Animal Testing”). Even with all of the perils, scientists persist on risking the health of patients by relying on animal experiments to foretoken the outcome of drugs in Homo sapiens. A major drug mishap happened in March 13, 2006. The drug was called TGN1412 it was created to treat B cell chronic lymphocyte leukemia and rheumatoid arthritis. Eight volunteers were given small doses in the Northwick Park Hospital in London. They became seriously ill and had to be placed in intensive care. Four suffered multiple organ dysfunction and one person showed signs of cancer, the last three either died or fell into a coma. (Saunders). Another example is the first attempt at heart lung transplants that were supposedly ‘perfected’ on animals. The first three humans died within 23 days. Of the 28 operated on from 1981 to 1085, 8 died peri-operatively and 10 developed a lung complication that didn’t show up in the dogs who were experimented on. Of those ten, four died and three never breathed again without the aid of a respirator. (50 Disasters). Finally, Vioxx from Merck, this drug alone killed more Americans than all the ones who died bravely in the Vietnam War, yet it was deemed safe in eight studies using six animals species (Erbe). These are not the only drugs that have cause human fatalities; many other drugs have had severe and even lethal effects in people after demonstrating safety in animal…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    First off, throughout the history of testing on animals, many human lives have been lost due to inaccuracies that have occurred during animal testing. There have been many cases where an animal showed no side effects when subjected to a specific medication. When that same medication was tested on humans, however, the reaction was completely different. Take the antidiarrheal drug, Clioquinol, for example. At the time of its release, this drug not only passed tests on rats and dogs, but in cats and rabbits as well. None of the animals were said to have experienced any adverse side effects. However, humans reacted in an entirely different manner. Clioquinol caused blindness and even paralysis in many of its…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing and experimentation in laboratories is always the form of animal cruelty that touches many hearts. This refers to animals being used in scientific experiments, such as medical, pharmaceutical, and commercial testing. These tests can be very dangerous for animals to partake; many animals are tortured and even killed in these procedures. It is estimated that over 70 million animals are tortured and killed in U.S. laboratories annually. This number has decreased over years due to stricter controls, scientific advances, and higher…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The practice of experimenting on animals has always been controversial. In pursuit of scientific knowledge, animal testing is essential, but as the word testing implies, such experiments are often harmful or ineffective. Over the decades scientists have had to choose whether to put morals over advancements, ultimately determining the fate of countless animals.…

    • 1432 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal experimentation is a highly controversial subject throughout the world and in the 20th century the public has become increasingly aware of the two sides to animal testing. The earliest dated animal testing can be traced back to 384-322 BCE and it is still a common practice to this day. There are a few disagreements that are highly debated about animal experimentation such as the importance of the testing for scientific and medical goals, the suffering of the animals, and the ethical principles that apply to animals. Both sides of animal experimentation have their reasons and facts for why animal testing is ethical or unethical, but it comes down to the amount of pain the animals suffers and if it is morally correct.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing is rarely successful since animals have different physiologies than humans. There has been many studies that have shown inaccuracy and unsuccess in animal testing. Studies show, “90 percent of medications approved for human use after animal testing later proved ineffective or harmful to humans in clinical trials” (Stop Animal Testing) and also, “Animal-tested drugs have killed, disabled or harmed millions of people and lead to costly delays as well” (Stop Animal Testing). It is evident that animal testing lacks accuracy and has dangerous consequences, therefore it should no longer be…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Ethics

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animals are usually confined to small cages and being exposed to harmful fumes for human benefit.In their “Animal” Journal, Elisabeth H. Ormandy and Catherine Schuppli claim that "the use of animals in research fosters a diverse range of attitudes, with some people expressing the desire for complete abolition of animal research practices, while others express strong support (392)." Animal testing has stirred up an argument between two opposing sides regarding the ethics of the practice. The two opposing sides are those who disagree with animal testing and those who agree with animal testing. Nuno Henrique Franco author of "Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective" state that "Animal experimentation has played a central role in biomedical research throughout history. For centuries, however, it has also been an issue of heated public and philosophical discussion."(238) Those who are in favor of animal testing believe that it is beneficial to improving medicine. Those who are against animal testing believe that it is harmful to animals and that their are other ways to benefit humans. Being an animal lover, I oppose of animal testing for several different reasons. The first reason being animals are being subjected to all forms of suffering and isolation. The second reason is animals are not…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmetic tests performed on animals include dropping chemicals in the animal’s eyes. Animal cruelty is when someone hurts an animal or does not care for an animal responsibly. Animal testing is basically that, so, technically, animal testing is animal abuse. Animals should not be experimented on because the testing is somewhat like torture and they are innocent. Although huge developments have been made with animal testing, about 90% of successful animal testing is not successful when used on humans.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Researchers need to test medicine using advanced technology not on animals. All researchers around the world need to find a safer more accurate way to test medication. If researchers keep using animals, their results will always be different for humans and they will never find a solution that will help people with their health. There are ways to test medication that are safer, faster, and cheaper than animal testing. If researchers use the technology animal testing will be eliminated from…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Animal Testing

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drugs that are successful in animals can fail on humans. Studies show that 94% of the drugs tested on animals don't even work on humans (procon.org). Another problem is researchers may mislead end or ignore cures because they didn't work on animals. “Some chemicals that are harmful to animals prove valuable when used by humans. Aspirin, for example, is dangerous for some animal species, and Fk-506 (tacrolimus), used to lower the risk of organ transplant rejection, was ‘almost shelved’ because of animal test results, according to neurologist Aysha Akhtar, MD, MPH.” says procon.org. The biggest problem is how different animals are to us. Although some animals have similar DNA to us, it reacts differently. It's like playing the guitar, you may play Don't Stop Believing, by Journey, and Someone Like You, by Adele, you are using the same chords, but they are two very different songs. “The anatomic, metabolic, and cellular differences between animals and people make animals poor models for human beings.” states procon.org.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scientists have been using animals to conduct experiments and tests since ancient times. Over the years, the practice of using animals has been under fire by animal protection and animal activist groups. Using animals for drug testing has become an important part of scientific experiments but it has also led to the deaths of millions of animals. When animal testing goes wrong, it can harm the users whom it is supposedly benefiting. The use of animal testing should be abandoned because it does not predict accurate results in human beings, it kills animals, and there are alternate testing methods that exist which do not involve the use of animals.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of animal cruelty, there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them, animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years, using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side, the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about, as said in the title, how animal testing is helpful in finding cures for human diseases and that we should continue in doing so. The article states “This extraordinary development wouldn’t have been possible without animal research” (Trull 2). This shows how animal testing has helped out in finding cures for many illnesses in humans. Without the help of animals, we wouldn’t have the cures we have today. On the other hand, some people believe that animal testing is wrong and shouldn’t be done. According to the article “Killing Animals and Humans,” it states “...many differences – both obvious and very subtle – between humans and other species make animal experiments a waste of time, effort, money and lives – both human and animal.” (Animal Aid 6). Why test on animals…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal experimentation, also known as animal testing refers to the action when scientists test any chemical or drug in animals for human-oriented purposes. The most common animals that are used are mices, rats, and primates. Animal are tested for cosmetic products research and medical advancements. The first federal law issued in the U.S. was the Animal Welfare Act, which regulated animal use in research. Most of the tests that are made on animals, failed or have failed in humans. Animal experimentation should stop because it hurts animals and it’s not illegal.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Animal Slaughter

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages

    These drugs are harmful to humans if consumed. The health of an animal while it is…

    • 2795 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays