Summary Of Ethical Boundary

In the article “Ethical Boundary-work in the Animal Research Laboratory” Pru Hobson-West writes about the three obstacles in regards to the occasion of talking about the ethics behind animal testing. The three “boundaries” that Hobson-West refers to are the need for animals to be tested with reference to the advancement of medicines, the impacts of “Home Office regulation” and the third is the difference between Human and Non-human animals (1). One of the main arguments that supports the use of animals in scientific experiments stated in this article is that when deciding whether or not it is ethical to use animals, you must determine whether or not humans have a higher moral value than animals (660). Another argument is whether or not restrictions
They attempt to draw the line, but as stated in the article by Hobson-West, they use can have a tendency to obstruct the experiments progress, and in turn be more harmful in the long run. In the article “Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research” the authors state that “some in the scientific community are beginning to question how well data from animals translates into germane knowledge and treatment of human conditions.” Simply meaning that, it is being discussed that the results coming from medicinal testing on animals may be producing results, however, the results that are being produced may not be beneficial towards treating ailments in humans. If the point of using animals to test these medicinal products is to possibly save the lives of humans, but the results cannot be applied in a real world setting, than the experiments themselves would be deemed unnecessary, and therefore unethical. This comes from the fact that as times goes on, we get a better understanding of animals and their threshold for pain and emotions