O’Reilly and Others Appellants v. Mackman and Others Respondents [1982] 3 W.L.R. 1096 House of Lords: HL Lord Diplock‚ Lord Fraser of Tullybelton‚ Lord Keith of Kinkel‚ Lord Bridge of Harwich and Lord Brightman 1982 Oct. 11‚ 12‚ 13; Nov. 25 Lord Denning M.R.‚ Ackner and O’Connor L.JJ. 1982 April 6‚ 7‚ 20; June 30 Peter Pain J. 1982 Feb. 25; March 5 [Conjoined Appeals] High Court--Procedure--Declaratory relief--Prisoners’ claims against prison visitors--Proceedings
Premium Appeal Habeas corpus
2003 P L C (C.S.) 1105 [Lahore High Court] Before Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry‚ J MUHAMMAD YASIN SAQIB Versus CHAIRMAN‚ PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION; ISLAMABAD and 7 ethers Writ Petition No. 24009 of 2000‚ decided on 8th August‚ 2002. (a) Constitution of Pakistan (1973)--- ----Art.199(1)(b)(ii)---Civil service---Writ of quo warranto‚ issuance of-- Authority in order to implement direction of Supreme Court given in its judgment‚ constituted a Committee to consider
Premium Pakistan Punjab Lahore
MOOT COURT PROBLEM No. 05 CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE I (U.G. Sem I) Date: 07/09/2015 ‘X’ is a non-governmental organisation functioning in the State of Uttar Pradesh‚ India. It was formed by a ‘Self Help group’ consisting of several rural artisans‚ farmers‚ destitute‚ labourers etc. The primary objective of the organisation is to provide a forum for farmers to sell their produce in cities‚ artisans from rural areas with a place to sell their services and products in cities
Premium Government of India President of the United States United States Constitution
I. Why do we want a Writ of Mandamus? In general‚ a writ of mandamus can be described as an order‚ “commanding the performance of an act that the law requires as a clearly defined duty‚ arising from an office‚ trust‚ or station.” 55 C.J.S. Mandamus § 1. Moreover‚ a writ of mandamus may be issued to command a nongovernmental body‚ such as a medical licensing board‚ to perform a specified duty imposed by law‚ and can also be invoked to control flagrant abuses of discretion. Id. For example‚ in some
Premium Government agency Administrative law New Jersey
Habeas Corpus and War on Terror Tanesha O’Neal POL 201 Instructor Binder June 23‚ 2013 We have heard in high school and news about Habeas Corpus and War on Terror‚ but what does those terms really mean? Habeas Corpus is an act that was established in 1679 by England’s Parliament to give prisoners a fair trial. The War on Terror was established on 9/2011 to bring war against Afghanistan for terrorizing the U.S. In this paper‚ I will further discuss Habeas Corpus and War on Terror and how
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States President of the United States
Case Briefing #2 Vizcaino v. US Dist. Court for WD of Wash.‚ 173 F. 3d 713 (9th Cir.1999) Material Facts: Donna Vizcaino‚ Jon R. Waite‚ Mark Stout‚ Geoffrey Culbert‚ Lesley Stuart‚ Thomas Morgan‚ Elizabeth Spokoiny‚ and Larry Spokoiny sued on behalf of themselves and a court certified class against Microsoft Corporation and its various pension and welfare plans‚ including its Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)‚ and sought a determination that they were entitled even as independent
Premium Appeal Habeas corpus Appellate court
ANALYSIS OF THE JUDGMENT IDENTIFICATION In Re: ARUNDHATI ROY ……………….. CONTEMNER [2002 Indlaw SC 145‚ (2002) 3 SCC 343‚ AIR 2002 SC 1375] CORAM - R.P. Sethi‚ G.B. Pattanaik‚ J.J. JURISDICTION – The power of the Supreme Court to take case suo moto and to punish for its own contempt has been granted by Article 129 of the Indian Constitution. FACTS IN ISSUE The facts of the case‚ which are not seriously disputed‚ are that an organisation‚ namely‚ Narmada Bachao
Premium Judge Judge Narmada Bachao Andolan
Wiki Loves Monuments: Photograph a monument‚ help Wikipedia and win! M. C. Mehta v. Union of India From Wikipedia‚ the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation‚ search M. C. Mehta v. Union of India | Supreme Court of India | Decided December 20‚ 1986 | Full case name: | M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors. | | | Citations: | 1987 SCR (1) 819 | | | | | | | Holding | | Case opinions | Majority by: C. J. Bhagwati[1] | Laws applied | Articles 12 and 21 of
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution Habeas corpus
Civil liberties‚ habeas corpus and the War on terror Ingrid Trinidad-Caito POL201 American National Government Dr. Melissa Stewart January 14‚ 2013 Civil liberties‚ habeas corpus and the War on terror War is a very scary and dangerous monster. It brings the worst in people; it divides families and friends. It makes us question everything we know and with the media we get too much information that we don’t know what to do with it. However‚ by learning
Premium Supreme Court of the United States President of the United States
Liberties‚ Habeas Corpus‚ and the War on Terror Jennifer Proctor POL201: American National Government Instructor: Luke Martin 10/29/12 Habeas Corpus has been around for very many years. Although no one knows its exact origin it still dates back pretty far. Habeas Corpus has been seen as a good thing and a bad thing. It has been around for every war we have had. It has also been suspended by two of our presidents in the past. The story and history of Habeas Corpus is a very
Premium Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution President of the United States