Mr. Coalk was hired by UV Systems Technology Inc. As their vice president of sales and Marketing in September 1997. Mr. Coalk entered into contract on February 28, 2000 with UVST and during this period parent company was SSI Ltd. UVST failed to pay entitled commission, expenses and wages. He filed a case for failure of entitled payment under Employment Standard Act. Lower court dismissed the case whereas supreme court overturn lower court judgement by awarding Mr. Coalk $180,000 in missing payment. Court also found that UVST and SSI Ltd. Were common employer so R. Coalk should have signed contract with both parent company SSI Ltd. And parent company UVST (The Common Employer, 2008). I think court made right decision by rewarding Mr.Coalk missing amount.…
This is the appellant’s skeleton argument for the case of his appeal. The arguments to quash the conviction under s. 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 (OAPA) are based on the misdirection’s…
This is a 2000 word RBI on Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article 86 (Absence without leave)…
Preface: Due to space constraints I will be focusing on the actions taken by and taken against BILAL Skaf solely as opposed to his brother MOHAMMED Skaf. In addition, I will be concentrating on the events which the charges were given rise to on 12 August 2000 and as opposed to 2 separate cases rape cases which Bilal Skaf was also a belligerent for the month of August 2000. I will also be mentioning the recent appeal case in 2008 which reduced the sentences given for the crimes in 2006.…
Before : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ - CHAIRMAN Venue : Industrial Court, Malaysia Kuala Lumpur Date of Reference : 27.02.2004 Dates of Mention : 25.05.2004; 07.12.2004; 15.09.2005; 31.05.2007; 03.12.2008; 23.09.2010; 17.01.2011; 06.04.2011; 10.08.2004; 16.12.2004; 12.07.2006; 31.03.2008; 03.06.2010; 28.10.2010; 17.02.2011; 11.05.2011; 08.09.2004; 09.08.2005; 11.09.2006; 06.05.2008; 19.08.2010; 09.12.2010; 02.03.2011; 09.06.2011 Dates of Hearing : 07.07.2005; 13.03.2008; 26.06.2009; 27.10.2009; 17.03.2010 16.10.2007; 09.10.2008; 26.08.2009; 05.01.2010; 17.10.2007; 03.12.2008; 19.10.2009; 11.02.2010; Dates of receipt of written Submissions : 17.01.2011 (from Claimant’s Counsel) : 05.04.2011 (from Company’s Counsel) 1 Representation : Mr. C.K. Ng from Messrs Wong & Associates, Counsel for the Claimant : Ms. Elizabeth Loo from Lee Hishammuddin Allen & Gledhill, Counsel for the Company Reference: This is a reference made Industrial Relations Act 1967 ENCIK HEEON YAP CHOO under arising section out (“the of 20(3) the Claimant”)…
(C.K. Thakker and Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ.) Bachan Singh ------------------ Appellant v. Union of India & Ors. -------------- Respondent(s) Civil Appeal No. 3110 of 2004, decided on July 10, 2008 The judgment of the Court was delivered by Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. Bachan Singh - appellant is aggrieved by the judgment and order dated February 5, 2002 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir at Jammu allowing the LPA (SW) No. 284/97 filed by the respondents herein against the judgment dated November 20, 1996 of the learned Single Judge of the High Court whereby the learned Single Judge allowed SWP No. 14-A/1984 filed by the appellant and quashed the General Court-Martial held against him including confirmation of sentence passed upon him by the General Court-Martial and the appellant is relegated back to the position he had on the date of passing of the order with all the benefits under the Rules. A General Court-Martial (GCM) under the Army Act, 1950 (for short `the Act') was convened by the competent authority on January 4, 1982 under Section 109 of the Act to try the appellant holding the rank of Sepoy in Second Batallion, the Dogra Regiment in the Army. The allegations against the appellant for which he was suspected to be tried by GCM were:"No.3973649A Sep Bachan Singh of 2DOGRA is resident of village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor, District Jammu (J&K) S/o Shri Dharam Singh and step son of Smt. Gyano Devi, second wife of Shri Dharam Singh. Sep. Bachan Singh studied in Govt. Lower High School, Paragwal upto the 9th. He was enrolled in the Army on 11 Oct. 75 to Meerut in the Dogra Regt. He is married to Smt. Veena Kumari D/o Shri Durga Singh resident of Village Chargarwar, Tehsil Jammu, District Jammu (J&K). Sep Bachan Singh proceeded on annual leave w.e.f. 16 Jan 80 to 15 Mar 80 to his home station village Paragwal, Tehsil Akhnoor. Shri Bachan Singh S/o Shri Waryam Singh resident of…
Some persons that may not be deserving of a position was given due to relation or favouritism. For example, the case with Devant Maharaj vs. NLCB where he was denied the position of acting Deputy Director of the Board. Gemma Joseph was appointed as acting Deputy Director while Mr Maharaj was over looked and he saw it as victimizations or unfair treatment; he then filed for judicial review on his issue. The commission in this case was ineffective as it did not allow fair treatment with promotions as stated in the Public Service Commission. Mr Maharaj won his case and was appointed as acting Deputy Director, he however did not take up as the position as it may lead to further victimization within the work place. This shows that although there may be regulations in place, it is not always followed due to the neglect of these acts and the very apparent cases of…
The petitioner went to the COMELEC, which dismissed his appeal on the ground that it had no power to review the decision of the RTC, based on Section 9 of R.A. 6679, that decisions of the RTC in a protest appealed to it from the municipal trial court in barangay elections “on questions of fact shall be final and non-appealable”. In his petition for certiorari, the COMELEC is faulted for not taking cognizance of the petitioners appeal.…
In respect of certain contracts of work assigned by the appellant certain disputes having been arisen, the matter was referred to arbitration. Two awards were made and the same were filed in the court of the Civil Judge in two Title (Arbitration) Suits Nos. 37/86 and 40/86. By a common order, the trial court made the awards rule of court in entirety and decrees were drawn in terms thereof. An appeal was filed against the said common order before the High Court. The High Court having dismissed the said appeal, the matter was carried to the Supreme Court.…
appealed for probation under the provisions of Act No. 4221. Judge Tuason of the Manila CFI…
IN THE instant case, the appointment of Lokayukta in the State of Gujarat was challenged. The Governor of Gujarat had appointed R.A. Mehta J. (Retd.) as Lokayukta in consultation with the Hon’ble Chief Justice of Gujarat under section 3(1) of the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 (hereinafter the Act), without consulting the Chief Minister and his Council of Ministers. Opposing this decision of the Governor, the State of Gujarat filed a writ petition in the High Court of Gujarat, challenging the appointment of R.A. Mehta J. to the post of Lokayukta. The matter was heard by a division bench and a split verdict was given. The matter was subsequently referred to the 3rd judge and on the basis of majority, the writ petition was dismissed and the said appointment was upheld. Hence, these appeals are made by the State of Gujarat against the appointment of respondent.…
Herein respondent Roberto Mabalot filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition with prayer for preliminary injunction and/or restraining order,[1] against petitioner and LTFRB Chairman Lantin, praying among others that Memorandum Order No. 96-735 be declared “illegal and without effect.” the lower court issued a temporary restraining order enjoining petitioner from implementing Memorandum Order No. 96-735. Secretary Lagdameo issued the assailed Department Order No. 97-1025. Respondent filed a Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Petition assailing the validity of Department Order No. 97-1025.…
Criminal Case Nos. Q-05-135151 and Q-05-135152 were filed against the accused appellant. RTC convicted accused-appellant for violating Sections 5 and 11, Article II of RA 9165 which was affirmed by the CA. Hence, accused-appellant filed an appeal to this Court.…
Civil Procedure - Contempt of court - Order of commital, application for - Committal proceedings - Whether all procedural rules have been complied with…
In the present case, there are two schools which are or can be described vividly to understand the jurisprudence behind hussainara khatoon judgement. Here firstly as mentioned in the facts the prisoners were kept undertrial for minor offences in about 5-10 years also the rich are released on bail though they were more responsible and liable for the offence made but at the same time the poor victims who were not liable but had not enough bail money so they had to remain bars At this very point the positivist school comes into consideration because in positive school they say that the law come from human authority it doesnot see whether the law is good or bad, just or unjust but the law should come from a political superior to a…