Preview

Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1387 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Civil Liberties, Habeas Corpus and the War on Terror
Civil liberties, habeas corpus and the War on terror Ingrid Trinidad-Caito POL201 American National Government Dr. Melissa Stewart January 14, 2013

Civil liberties, habeas corpus and the War on terror War is a very scary and dangerous monster. It brings the worst in people; it divides families and friends. It makes us question everything we know and with the media we get too much information that we don’t know what to do with it. However, by learning our history, everybody’s role in the government, learning how the system works and learning simple terms like enemy combatant and habeas corpus you can learn that there is more than just our laws and Constitution. We are not alone in this war. Habeas corpus is located in the United States Constitution in Article One, Section Nine, under congress limits. It says, “The privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in case of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) Habeas corpus is Latin for “you should have the body”. (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011) It means that the accused most appear in front of a judge and know the charges haled against him or her. Known as the “great writ of liberty” (Columbia electronic encyclopedia, 2011), it protects people from been held for a prolonged time and not been informed of the charges against them. The court has to document the illegal act and bring to the judge, the accused. It also gives us access to basic legal protection, like due process and counsel. (Levin-Waldman, O.M., 2012, p.255) With these rights the accused can be informed of his or her rights and can inform the judge of his or her guilt or innocence. The British colonies brought habeas corpus from England. The Writ was mainly for the judge to check the jailor legitimacy. (Lobban, M., 2011, p257-269) If the jailor was been a tyrant, it would have reflected badly on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus (or writ of Habeas corpus ) is a judicially enforceable order issued by a court of law to a prison official ordering that a prisoner be brought to the court so it can be determined whether or not that prisoner had been lawfully imprisoned and, if not, whether he or she should be released from custody. The right of habeas corpus is the constitutionally bestowed right of a person to present evidence before a court that he or she has been wrongly imprisoned. The rights of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I of the Constitution, which…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The term habeas corpus was first used in England in the 14th century, but didn’t become official until the 1679 Habeas Corpus Act was passed in Great Britain. Prior to the Revolutionary War, British soldiers were holding colonist without allowing them to exercise their right of habeas corpus. This was one reason that sparked the Revolutionary War. As a result, the founding fathers of America added habeas corpus to The Constitution of the United States, saying that "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it" (Article 1, Section 9) (The Columbia Encyclopedia. 2011, p.1). To this day, citizens that have been charged with a crime enjoy the right of habeas corpus, usually in federal appeals. Habeas Corpus protects the civil liberty of citizens, as it assures them a chance to be heard by the highest court in the land. In contemporary America, as it relates to the war on terror, habeas corpus has been suspended in some cases, especially…

    • 1490 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The law of Habeas Corpus was created to permit the guilty to present their case in court and to be tried fairly. In today 's war on terror, the amount of such enemy combatants who were detained indefinitely without any trial has raised. The courts are split up on following the law by the letter or to practically change it according to the situation 's needs. I feel it 's necessary to follow these laws in the same context in which they were written, and the pragmatic approach leaves room for reckless changes. To deny an enemy combatant his or her day in court cannot be justified as taking the pragmatic approach in dealing with war criminals. This paper is an attempt to present the state of law today towards war criminals and the implications of denying the basic right of Habeas Corpus to suspected terrorists.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    First, individual liberties and freedoms are important since without them one can be held indefinitely. Habeas corpus also known as the “great writ of liberty” guarantees that a person who is being held unjustly can go free (Habeas corpus, 2011). This is one of the reasons that make America so great because anyone who is detained can know the reason why they are being held and in so are allowed due process under the law. The Constitution protects the…

    • 2236 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right of writs of habeas corpus are granted in Article I, Section 9, clause 2 of the…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL 201 Final Paper

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The term habeas corpus which is Latin for you have the body have reference to the writ of inquiring into the lawfulness of a person who is detained the guardian of an inmate to transport that inmate in front the court and justify the details for his or her incarceration. A court order of habeas corpus is a test to the lawfulness of an inmate custody and does not require an investigation into the inmate’s guiltiness or their innocence. Once the court has finished the details for imprisonment the court the inmate or return the inmate into confinement. The use of the habeas corpus has origins in English communal law dating back to the 14th century and became a part England’s legislative law in 1679. The American colonial courts distributed the writ at common law, and state governments remain to understand the rights of habeas corpus following liberty. In 1807 the Supreme Court acclaimed that the municipal courts could not give habeas corpus to inmates that were being held by the state and or local government because Congress could not grant that kind of power.…

    • 1580 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On June 13th, 1966, the Supreme Court announced its 5-4 ruling in the Miranda v. Arizona case. This ruling established “Miranda Rights,” a standard police procedure which revolves around the principle that an arresting officer must advise a criminal suspect of his or her rights before being taken into custody and interrogated. The Court’s ruling in this landmark case effectively reinforced the importance of ensuring that the accused are aware of their Fifth Amendment rights. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no one can be forced to testify against himself; defendants in criminal cases can choose to remain silent, "pleading the Fifth," rather than offering testimony that might be used to convict them (Shmoop Editorial Team).…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first thing we need to establish is what do we consider habeas corpus. Habeas corpus is holding…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life and the End

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The word writ means a “writing” and habeas corpus is a Latin term meaning “have the body.” The Latin name of the writ used to compel a government official, like a prison warden to show because why the official is holding a person in custody.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    According to the article Habeas Corpus in the Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia 6th edition (2011) the writ of habeas corpus is Latin for you should have the body. There are two important factors that go along with its Latin meaning. First a writ is a document in a courts name to a jailor for example, to act or not act in some way. This writ is an order by judge to see a prisoner in the case was they get arrested and detained. The article explains that habeas corpus was not set up to determine guilt but, make sure a prisoner is being treated fairly ,has not been held unlawfully and is let go in the case that the prisoner has been held unlawfully. The article goes on to explain that habeas corpus is also used by state prisoners to appeal their convictions if they feel like they have had their rights…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas Corpus Paper

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Habeas Corpus, what does it mean? The literal meaning is Latin that translates as “you have the body “. A writ of Habeas Corpus means a “body” that is being held has the right to be brought before the court and have the charges be stated that they are being held for. In layman’s terms, you cannot be held for no reason; you have to be charged with something to be detained. We don’t live in a communist state where we can be picked up off the street and be jailed for an unlimited amount of time with no due process. A Habeas Corpus petition is used for many situations, from unlawful imprisonment to family law involving custody of children. (The ‘Lectric Law Library’ 1995-2012)…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Habeas corpus, a Latin term meaning "you have the body," an important right granted to individuals in America and refers to the right of every prisoner to challenge the terms of his or her incarceration in court before a judge. Basically it means that a judicial mandate require that a prisoner be brought before the court to determine whether the government has the right to continue detaining them. The individual being held or a person representing them can petition the court for such a writ.…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas corpus is considered to be one of the most fundamental guarantees of personal liberty we have enjoyed as a country since the inception of our Constitution. However, questions have arisen regarding the proper use of habeas corpus and have been brought into focus in the past decade. In the years since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, hundreds of people have been detained by the United States government as part of its war on terror. Most of these detainees face indefinite detention and have neither been charged with a crime nor afforded prisoner of war status. Habeas corpus serves to protect citizens against arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings and is a fundamental personal libers guaranteed by our Constitution and cannot be suspended based on that fact.…

    • 2163 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The biggest suspension of civil liberties in the history of the United States was Lincoln suspending the writ of habeas corpus. Habeas Corpus is a legal action, through which a person can seek relief from unlawful detention, or the relief of another person. The writ of habeas corpus protects persons from harming themselves, or from being harmed by the judicial system. Lincoln suspended habeas corpus in order to arrest war protesters under military authority; Lincoln did this because he believed state courts would not punish war protestors properly.…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Do you recall "For liberty and Justice for all"? Well it seems as if those six words no longer exist in present day America. As a Veteran of the Military, I swore to serve and protect those foreign and domestic. Like many active duty and veteran military, I felt a sense of pride and accomplishment as a soldier knowing that I was fighting for a country where you had civil liberties. At the time it was truly the land of the free and the home of the brave. Unfortunately, those liberties, that most Americans take for granted and others flee to this country to obtain, was threatened on September 11, 2001. The nation suffered from a great deal of loss, pain, anger, and disbelief that was felt across the world. With emotions becoming more inflamed with thoughts of revenge, the American people wanted answers and even more importantly, they wanted to see immediate action against those that commented this act of terror against this great nation. In response, Former-President George W. Bush and his administration set out to capture those thought to be responsible for the terrorist attack. In addition, Former-President Bush and his administration went to great lengths to go beyond the reach of the judicial system which enforces the writ of Habeas Corpus. These actions have been highly debated all across the nation and even the world. Did the tragedy of September 11th, justify the actions of the Former-President? Was and is it fair that people were and are still locked away, stripped of their basic rights under the writ of Habeas Corpus? Is this “Great Nation” so powerful that the very laws that were put into place to protect now don’t apply? The following exams these questions and many more, including the writ of Habeas Corpus, legal debates regarding this topic, and the perspectives of Former-President Bush and his administration during the time immediately following the September 11th attack.…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays