Preview

Requesting a Writ of Mandamus in Nj

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1272 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Requesting a Writ of Mandamus in Nj
I. Why do we want a Writ of Mandamus?
In general, a writ of mandamus can be described as an order, “commanding the performance of an act that the law requires as a clearly defined duty, arising from an office, trust, or station.” 55 C.J.S. Mandamus § 1. Moreover, a writ of mandamus may be issued to command a nongovernmental body, such as a medical licensing board, to perform a specified duty imposed by law, and can also be invoked to control flagrant abuses of discretion. Id. For example, in some instances, upon judicial review, if a court is satisfied that the applicant is entitled to a license, it may order the license issued notwithstanding the boards denial of the license. 70 C.J.S. Physicians and Surgeons § 38.
In New Jersey, “Prior to the adoption of the 1947 Constitution, ‘persons aggrieved by action or inaction of … administrative agencies could seek judicial relief by applying for one of the prerogative writs – certiorari, mandamus, quo warranto and prohibition.” Jeffery S. Mandel, New Jersey Appellate Practice 141 (GANN, 2008). However, such writs were abolished by the 1947 Constitution in an attempt to simplify the procedure with regard to prerogative writs. Id. at 142. At that time, prerogative writs were superseded and consolidated into one action, now called actions “in lieu of prerogative writs.” Id.; 19 N.J. Prac., Skills And Methods § 4:1, § 4:2 (Rev. 3d ed.).
State boards of medical examiners, also known as medical licensing boards, are state agencies subject to state administrative procedures. 61 Am. Jur. 2d License to Practice § 17. Therefore, the acts and decisions of these boards are governed by state administrative procedure acts, which usually provide for judicial review. Id. § 62, § 103. Mandamus, in general, is a proper remedy to review acts and decisions of an administrative agency, and more specifically, to compel action by a licensing board with respect to the issuance of professional licenses. 52 Am. Jur. 2d Mandamus § 203; see

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Lemon V. Kurtzman

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bibliography: “Agostini V. Felton (1997).” Cornell University Law School Legal Information Institute. October 11, 2013. Accessed October 11, 2013. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/521/203.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Carp, Robert A., Ronald Stidham, and Kenneth L. Manning. "chapter 6." Judicial process in America. 8th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2011. 125. Print.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Agency Overview

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Board is responsible for investigating patient complaints against physicians and when appropriate, taking disciplinary action against their licenses. This means that if a patient has a complaint about a specific doctor or a medical facility, the Board will review the complaint and then investigate the situation. Appropriate discipline will be administered, ranging from practice restrictions to revocation of their licenses.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ayy lmao

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages

    III. The History of the case being appealed to the Supreme Court and the decisions of the lower courts…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Again, you are receiving this letter to inform you we will not be representing you in regards to this matter and will not be taking any further actions on your behalf. Enclosed are your medical records, a charge for retrieving medical records, a copy of the statute…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    issued. The writ is just a request for the lower courts to submit court records for the case review.…

    • 661 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Court History and Purpose. The courts are a critical component of American criminal justice because they determine what should happen to people charged with violating the law. Courts are important beyond criminal justice, too. Disputes that arise between private parties, businesses, government officials, and the like are brought to court in order to ensure that they are heard, ideally, in a neutral forum (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011). Succeeding in liberation and independence is difficult within the world and as simple as legally right and legally wrong. Courts emphasize on the power of the state and the legitimate use of force and protect people against the random use of legislative authority. The tension among the general public independence and social order is long-lasting. The court front-runners recognize it is never just one way to handle a situation, the need for an unbiased and self-governing court is embedded in the social circumstance. To understand the whole court process there are three distinct elements that have to be consider to become a court, it must have proper legal authority and have all of the guild lines within the constitution. Courts are generally found in the judicial as opposed to legislative and executive branches of government, and ‘courts are empowered to make decisions that are binding. The notion of “deciding upon cases, controversies in law, and disputed matters of fact” is known as adjudication, or “the process by which a court arrives at a decision regarding a case” (Siegel, Schmalleger, & Worrall, 2011).…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Roscoe Pound, "Discretion, dispensation and mitigation: The problem of the individual special case," New York University Law Review (1960) 35:925, 926…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    opposed to the opposite which happens so often when officers decide to go beyond their jurisdiction. In this paper, controversial topics dealing with constitutional rights of U.S. citizens will be presented and how they are governed.…

    • 2196 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Quiz 1

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the U.S. Supreme Court, certiorari: I. is discretionary. II. does not require the court to hear the appeal. III. is usually granted because a case raises an important constitutional issue affecting large numbers of individuals. IV. is usually granted to prevent punishment of the innocent…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sutherland, M. (2005). Judicial Tyranny: The New Kings of America. St. Louis, MO: The National Policy Center. ISBN: 9780975345566…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Marbury V. Madison

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marbury v. Madison was a very influential Supreme Court case in the history of the United States. Marbury v. Madison was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial review. This happened under Article III in the Constitution. The court case helped to make a boundary between the executive and judicial branches of the American form of government. In the final days of his presidency, John Adams appointed a large number of justices of peace for the District of Columbia whose commissions were approved by the Senate, signed by the president, and had the official seal of the government on them. William Marbury, who was the Justice of Peace, asked the Supreme Court to force James Madison, Secretary of State, to deliver the commissions. The commissions were not delivered, however, and when President Jefferson assumed office, March 5, 1801, he ordered Madison not to deliver them. Marbury then asked the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus forcing Madison to show reason not to receive his commission. It was through three questions asked by John Marshall that the case was resolved. First, did Marbury have a right to the writ for which he petitioned? Second, if he has a right and that right was violated, do the laws of the United States allow the courts to grant Marbury such a writ? And third, if they did, is it right to ask the Supreme Court to issue such a writ? (Nichols 1).…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    A writ of assistance is a written order issued by a court instructing a law enforcement official, such as a sheriff or tax collector, to perform a certain task. The writs of assistance that James Otis challenged were general warrants allowing officials to search for smuggled material within any suspected premises. James Otis was Advocate-General when the legality of these warrants was attacked, but promptly resigned his office when called upon to defend that legality. Boston merchants then retained him as their counsel to oppose the writs before the Superior Court of Massachusetts. Otis refused the fee they offered, saying that in such a cause he despised all fees. In a five-hour speech, which was witnessed by a young John Adams, Otis argued…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: Mapp petition for a writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court for the appreal from the Supreme Court of Ohio.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was through these facts that Marbury brought a case before the supreme court challenging the validity of the actions by Madison in the refusal of complete the commission process. In filing Marbury sought Writ of mandamus that could compel state secretary Madison to execute the commission process. The writ mandamus forces a state office to complete a ministerial act as it is recognized by law and not individual…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays