14) What torts‚ if any‚ have been committed in the following situation: a) Just as Alice is sitting down on a chair‚ Nathan creeps up from behind and whips the chair from under her. Alice falls to the ground and fractures her arm. TRESPASS TO PERSON BATTERY DEFINITION: The intentional and direct application of force to another person without that person’s consent. ELEMENTS OF BATTERY: iii) Physical contact iii) Physical contact ii) The Defendant’s act was under his control ii) The Defendant’s
Premium Tort law Legal terms Tort
Assignment III- Tort (Negligence/Res ipsa loquitur) Prof Lindsey Appiah Tort Law November 18‚ 2012 Define a Tort A tort is a civil wrong‚ other than a breach of contract‚ for which courts provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages (Schubert‚ 2012). The difference between a crime and a tort is the government’s involvement. A law will be passed by government to prohibit certain acts‚ making those acts a crime. Those who break the law may be punished by the government for the crime(s)
Premium Tort law Tort Common law
“The Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher remains a tort of strict liability. The statement posed to us above is quite contentious‚ a statement which attracts diverse views from a number of different jurisdictions. The main question to consider here is whether the rule in Rylands v. Fletcher remains an independent tort of strict liability or whether there has been a move towards negligence and nuisance in recent years. There is a great emphasis placed on the rule of Rylands v. Fletcher for law students‚
Premium Common law
environments. I want to be a social worker for that type of group or teens also. Before being introduced to the individuals listed above‚‚ I really didn’t know any child advocates that stand for something that is right . I been living under a rock because Erin Merryn is a recent advocate that trying to promote her law for the safety of the children. They changed my views on the term of child advocates and what does advocacy means in general. When I read all of the individual’s stories‚ I was really inspired
Premium Education Psychology Learning
Has WIRETIME‚ Inc. committed any torts? If so‚ explain. WIRETIME has intentionally carried out a business associated tort most commonly known as Defamation. In this case all 4 factors of defamation are there. A defamatory declaration was made; it was displayed to a 3rd party‚ the declaration was very particular to one organization‚ and it put a negative frame of mind to BUGusa’s clients. Scenario: WIRETIME‚ Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME‚ Inc. committed any torts? If so‚ explain. In this case
Premium Tort Tort law Contract
Elements of Torts Torts and the Legal System Business and Torts Intentional Negligent Without fault (strict liability) For a business‚ torts come about in three ways A person is harmed by the actions of a business or its employees A person is harmed by a product manufactured or distributed by the business or A business is harmed by the wrongful actions of another business or person Role of Tort Law While most criminal acts‚ especially violent ones‚ involve a tort‚ most torts do not involve
Premium Tort law Tort Negligence
ASPECTS OF CONTRACT AND NEGLIGENCE OF BUSINESS Task: 1.1: Explain the importance of the essential elements required for the information of a valid contract? Offer A valid offer identifies the bargained-for exchange between the parties and creates a power of acceptance in the party to whom the offer is made. The communication by one party known as the offeror to the another party called the offeree b) Acceptance To constitute a contract‚ there must be an acceptance of the offer
Premium Contract
health and the child’s condition was “normal” for one conceived about seven months earlier. Dr. Mann thinks the baby was probably capable of a separate existence outside the womb. Question Presented: Is the Defendant liable to the plaintiff for the tort of wrongful death of the plaintiff’s child when the defendant negligently operated his vehicle and struck his vehicle onto the plaintiff resulting in the death of her child even though the child was a fetus at the time of the accident. Conclusion:
Premium Automobile Family Ethics
Module 1- Intentional Tort Samuels vs. Southern Baptist Hospital taking place February 13th 1992 in Louisiana. A minor age sixteen Rochelle Harris and her family sue for an Intentional tort from the Southern Baptist’s former employee Raymond Stewart. The injury that occurred here was an incident of a common everyday tort known as rape. Ms. Rochelle was sixteen at the time of this intentional tort she had been admitted to a psychiatric ward at Southern Baptist Hospital by her parents from an attempt
Premium Hospital Psychiatric hospital Tort law
Armington The Case is that Armington‚ while robbing a drugstore‚ shot and seriously injured Jennings‚ a drugstore clerk. Armington was subsequently convicted in a criminal trial of armed robbery and assault and battery. Jennings later brought a civil tort suit against Armington for damages. Armington contended that he could not be tried again for the same crime‚ as that would constitute double jeopardy‚ which is prohibited by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. Armington is standing by the Fifth
Premium Trial Crime Tort