Both scientists made their points using logical fallacies. As the viewer you can easily see the argument flaws in the person you disagree with. In the creationist debate Ken Hamm uses an appeal to authority by mentioning successful scientists who believe in creationism‚ such as the inventor of the MRI scanner and an Astronomer. He works hard to define terms differently‚ repeatedly in a circular argument. Only one thing in his debate made me pause‚ he discussed how the
Premium
The claim that is introduced needs more evidence and numbers to back it up. As the argument is currently presented‚ it dismantles itself. It states that "many lives may be saved" if individuals were inoculated against the disease but that there is only a "small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations." A person viewing this with a critical eye‚ can immediately see that in this language‚ the amounts of lives saved by this inoculation will far outnumber the potential deaths
Premium Immune system Vaccine Vaccination
questions a computer based on logic can answer. In an explicit argument‚ it would look something like this: humans have no limits to what logical questions they can
Premium
latter part of Descartes proposition namely ‘that is a mind‚ soul‚ understanding or reason’ (Ibid‚ 2000); conceiving it to be erroneous; for it ostensibly reads ‘I am thinking‚ therefore I am a thought’. This is condemned by Hobbes as a spurious argument for it does not seem logical to say a thinking thing equates its faculty of thinking. Nor is it logical to say ‘I understand‚ therefore I am an understanding’ (Ibid‚ 2000). Surely rather from Hobbes’ point of view‚ it is efficacious to contend ‘I
Premium Mind Concepts in metaphysics Cognition
obligation to the company? Loyalty at the base is a strong feeling of support or allegiance. Ronald Duska in his argument for whistleblowers on the basis that one does not have loyalty to a company. Duska defines loyalty as a relationship between two or more people (a group) brought together for mutual fulfilment and support Duska then focuses on loyalty within a group in order to make his argument against a company deserving the similar level of loyalty. “A group takes on an identity and a reality of
Premium
In the Republic written by Plato‚ Glaucon presented an argument concerning “the nature and origin of justice”. This argument has caused many beliefs and interpretations from Glaucon about justice. Glaucon presents his arguments by stating the four premises and what each one of them mean. His first premise is “It is by nature good to harm”. This premise is broken up into different meanings by nature‚ being referred to character individuality‚ good being referred to an enjoyable experience and harm
Premium Morality Ethics Human
Argument Analysis for The Argument against Headphones Virginia Heffernan who writes the article‚ "The Argument against Headphones"‚ talks about headphone use in the millennial generation. She tells us that‚ “one in five teenagers in America can’t hear rustles or whispers…” (Heffernan‚ 1). She also provides us with the history of headphones‚ starting with their creation over 100 years ago by Nathaniel Baldwin. It ends with what we know to be modern day models. While Heffernan does use ethos‚ logos
Premium Woman Gender Gender role
the founding fathers wrote a constitution the did not fit all Americans. The constitution was written for the white male. African Americans and women did not have these rights until later on in history. The question also is apparent in the abortion argument‚ Gary Bauer a prominent figure in the Pro-life movement fights to say unborn fetuses are people. The meaning of a person and who deserve constitutional is expanding. In history it wasn’t always so easy and people had to fight for their
Premium George W. Bush President of the United States Supreme Court of the United States
In this paper I am going to argue that Strawson’s argument‚ which says that people cannot be ultimately morally responsible for who they are‚ is wrong. I base my answer in the concept of free will‚ which I am going to explain once I have clearly established Strawson’s point of view. Strawson claims that we cannot be ultimately morally responsible for our actions whether or not determinism is true. Strawson’s claim is based in the Basic argument‚ which states the following: (1) nothing can be the
Premium Free will Human Determinism
People with self-control can control their emotions. During an argument‚ they control their natural tendency to become extremely upset or sad. However‚ temperate people in an argument understand that emotions will only make their argument worse‚ so they don’t have their emotions overcome them. Next‚ people with self-control suppress their desires to eat a whole pizza in one setting. They don’t eat
Premium Psychology Emotion Feeling