Preview

Why The Battles Of Hannibal, Baal, And Rome

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
959 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why The Battles Of Hannibal, Baal, And Rome
Hannibal, Baal, and Rome

Hannibal Barca was one of the greatest Generals of his time. Although his abilities at developing battle strategies were unequaled in his day, the driving forces behind his successes as a general, were not only his superior military ability, but also his feelings of hostility toward the Romans. Because of his ability to plan and organize military campaigns he was able to succeed in crossing thousands of troops across the Alps to invade Italy. Hannibal, son of General Hamilcar Barca, showed hostility toward the Romans due to the fact that he had been indoctrinated in the theology of the Carthaginian god Baal. This indoctrination along with the fact that Rome and Carthage were enemies only served to fuel his hostility and aggression.
Baal was the Carthaginian version of a "divine lord and protector", much like Zeus was to the Greeks, and Jupiter to the Romans. Baal, however, had other names, such as Beelzebub, meaning “Lord of the Flies”. Baal was given this dubious title due to the large numbers of flies that were seen to gather in and around his statues, attracted by the foul stench of decay, blood and death. Baal was reputed to be a hard hearted god who ruled
…show more content…
He is most remembered for marching an army of thousands which included war elephants, from Iberia over the Pyrenees and the Alps into the northern part of Italy. During the first years of his fifteen year occupation of Italy, Hannibal and his armies were able to take Trebia, Trasimene and Cannae. In addition he was able to build alliances with some Romans. However, Scipio of North Africa had spent time analyzing and studying Hannibal’s tactics, he added some of his own and launched a counter invasion from the Northern part of Africa. Scipio sent Hannibal and his troops back to Carthage where he and his troops were defeated at the Battle of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    battles of April and May. He then led his corps onto Sicily in July. In the approach to…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal’s overall war strategy in Italy, or lack thereof, can be seen as a strong contributing factor to Carthage’s ultimate defeat in the Second Punic War. Livy describes, “Hannibal…without orders from the senate, crossed both the Alps and the Ebro.” Demonstrating his defiance of Carthaginian Government’s ambitions against Rome. Ultimately, Hannibal sought not to destroy Rome but to “create a balance of power with [her]” according to Fronda. This is to suggest that rather than conquer Rome, Hannibal wanted to be on the same playing field in order to deny them the opportunity to claim hegemony over the Mediterranean. The content of the Macedonian–Carthaginian Treaty further evidences Hannibal’s lack of intention to destroy Rome as, in multiple sections, it discusses how Rome will be treated and acknowledges their…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Scipio Africanus Outline

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This act caused Hannibal to leave Italy and return to Africa to fight Scipio. In 202 BC…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper the overview, prelude, and battle of Lake Trasimene will be analyzed and discussed to understand the brilliance behind one of the greatest military tactical attacks in history. The Battle of Lake Trasimene was waged by one of the most charismatic, smart, and cunning generals of all time in Hannibal. Hannibal, the son of Hamilcar Barca of Carthage, was raised to eat, breath, and hate Rome from the beginning of his childhood. Livy states that, “From the day when he was proclaimed commander in chief, he seemed to regard Italy as his assigned field of action, and war with Rome as a duty imposed upon him.”(Livy 21.5, Line 1-3.) This inner rage that was instilled in him as a child is a driving force that can be seen throughout this battle as well as his remaining campaigns against the Romans.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The second war started in 218 BC and ended in 201 BC. The leader of the Carthage in this war was the general hannibal, who also made a daring cross in the middle of the winter to attack Rome. He brought elephants with him when he attacked Rome.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar had been a part of many battles and wars, in which he has come out victorious. Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia points out that “He excelled in war, in statesmanship, and in oratory”(Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia 16). In the war against Gnaeus Pompeius, Julius came out quite victorious. In fact, Anderson notes “On August 9, 48 BC Julius Caesar defeated Gnaeus Pompeius on the plains of pharsalus”(Anderson 1). Anderson also stated “ Caesar destroyed another Pompeian…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He conquered Rome and Gaul (France). He governed it for 9 years and soon, he had conquered almost all of western Europe. Julius Caesar gained a lot of power and over time, became a dictator. Many people thought that he was making too many changes to Rome with all of his power. So, the Senate ordered Julius Caesar's death.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Tactics

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “All Gaul is divided into three parts, one of which the Belgae inhabit, the Aquitani another, those who in their own language are called Celts, in our Gauls, the third.” – Caesar. Taking place over a course of almost a decade, the Gallic Wars were fought throughout much of modern day Germany, France and Belgium. From 58 to 51 BC, Julius Caesar, the consul of Cisalpine Gaul, led his army in a series of campaigns demonstrating their formidable training and strategy as they attempted to conquer Gaul. Fighting against the native tribes, primarily the Belgae, the Aquitani and the Gauls, the Roman army was forced to utilize all of their discipline and technological skill as they fought the native tribes of Gaul. Caesar’s Gallic campaigns illustrate…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because the Romans were successful at defeating the state of Carthage in the First Punic War, Hannibal Barca was determined to retaliate and claim victory over the Romans. Hannibal’s threats caused widespread fear amongst Italian citizens for many years. For the Second Punic War, Hannibal looked to his father, a great commander of Spain, to assist him with forming a powerful army. Hannibal was able to gather 50,000 infantry, 9,000 cavalry, and several elephants for his journey from Spain to Rome. Hannibal traveled by land instead of by water because he was aware of the Roman’s presence at the Mediterranean Sea.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar’s military campaign was successful for many reasons, he was a skillful and vigilant military leader who was always a step ahead of his enemies, his legions were well-trained and loyal, and his alliances with surrounding were well utilized and were assisted when needed. In 61 B.C. the Helvetii, led by Orgetorix, have been convinced that their country was too small for their population and supply demand. They then began a two-year preparation for war to gain more land and expand their country. Although Orgetorix dies before the war had begun, the Helvetii continued on with the plan.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Because Hannibal was such a successful leader, his character was, and still is, debated over. By nature, the Romans, their allies, and even Hanno, a Carthaginian, disliked Hannibal because he brought fear and destruction to their peoples. On the other hand Carthage and its allies respected Hannibal because he brought expansion and wealth. Although both sides of the argument completely oppose each other, both have adequate reasoning.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Forming alliances with Crassus, a man of great wealth in Rome, Caesar was able to obtain the position of governor of Gaul, which allowed him to further increase his power and social standing (Biography.com Editors). It was during this time that Caesar neglected his duties as a political leader of great importance and strived only for personal gain by attacking and enslaving Romans in Spain and Gaul (Abbott 86). Furthermore, rather than facing prosecution for his actions, Caesar illegally crossed the Rubicon with the 13th Legion, an action that greatly concerned a great deal of the Roman Senators (Allen 14). After Caesar’s actions, a civil war was sparked in which Caesar defeated Pompey the Great as well as other high ranking Roman officials (Biography.com Editors 16). Caesar’s actions during this time period prove that he was vengeful and defeated a great deal of his opponents at any cost, two things that justified his…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Punic Wars Analysis

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Fabius Maximus was not a traditional Roman strategic leader, as he was known for refusing open battle. Fabius, or the great delayer, appeared to have used systems thinking to deal with Hannibal after the two significant Roman defeats. Fabian’s strategy was to indirectly repress the enemy by disrupting supply lines through skirmishes with Hannibal’s foraging forces, thus weakening the Carthaginian Army. In system terms, the Romans were effectively providing input to a variable on the Carthaginian’s sustainment feedback loop. There was no immediate effect or victor, but ultimately the Roman disruption of supplies, coupled with Hannibal’s inability to receive provisions from Carthage eventually lead to Rome ousting Hannibal from…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To better understand Hannibal’s rise to greatness one needs to look into his father’s history. After Carthage 's defeat in the First Punic War, Hamilcar set out to improve his family 's and Carthage 's fortunes. With that in mind and supported by Gades, Hamilcar began the subjugation of the tribes of the Iberian Peninsula. Carthage at the time was in such a poor state that its navy was unable to transport his army to Iberia (Hispania); instead, Hamilcar had to march it towards the Pillars of Hercules and transport it across the Strait of Gibraltar.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays