Character Analysis: The Assassination Of Julius Caesar

To assassinate means, “To kill suddenly or secretively, especially a politically prominent person; murder premeditatedly and treacherously”(dictionary reference 1).. Julius Caesar was born on July 12, 100 BC, and was assassinated by many Roman senators near the theatre of Pompey on the Ides of March, on March 15, 44 BC. Achity explains his assassination by stating that “In the Senate chamber, Antonius is drawn to one side. Then the conspirators crowd about Caesar as if to second a petition for the repealing of an order banishing Publius Cimber. When he refuses the petition, the conspirators attack him, and he falls dead of twenty-three knife wounds” (Atchity 7). The assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader; however, others believe that he was a tyrant. Julius Caesar had been a part of many battles and wars, in which he has come out victorious. Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia points out that “He excelled in war, in statesmanship, and in oratory”(Colombia Electronic Encyclopedia 16). In the war against Gnaeus Pompeius, Julius came out quite victorious. In fact, Anderson notes “On August 9, 48 BC Julius Caesar defeated Gnaeus Pompeius on the plains of pharsalus”(Anderson 1). Anderson also stated “ Caesar destroyed another Pompeian
Julius was not selfish in any way. During his reign he helped many find homes, with taxes, and many more. Miola and Bloom stated “ His generosity United all Romans as familial Lagatees, and though he shows superbial , he places self last and others first” ( Miola and Bloom 1). Julius showed qualities that a good leader should always have. All in all, the assassination of Julius Caesar was unjust because he was a victorious soldier, and he was a prosperous leader. Although others believe that he wa a tyrant, they were still