Preview

Why Is Hannibal Good Or Bad

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
620 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Is Hannibal Good Or Bad
Hannibal

Because Hannibal was such a successful leader, his character was, and still is, debated over. By nature, the Romans, their allies, and even Hanno, a Carthaginian, disliked Hannibal because he brought fear and destruction to their peoples. On the other hand Carthage and its allies respected Hannibal because he brought expansion and wealth. Although both sides of the argument completely oppose each other, both have adequate reasoning. Hannibal gave many reasons to be disliked due to his characteristics and habits. He was very cruel to tribes that were not directly in the war. For example, both the Alpine and Flagellan peoples tried to protect themselves from the imminent looting of their territories by attacking Hannibal’s army

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hannibal resumed his siege of Saguntum and conquered it after a terrible and costly siege. Hannibal, although he held preeminence in Carthage, still had to rely on his allies to keep him in power. A delegate was sent to Rome to answer a question regarding whether Hannibal had acted on his own or had the approval of the Carthaginian senate. The delegate, according to Livy, was the best orator in Carthage. He quickly quashed the argument regarding the border of Hasdrubal because the Carthaginian council had not been part of the talks. Furthermore, he argued that the Romans had broken the treaty after the First War by invading Sardinia; finally, he stated that Hannibal broke no treaty because the Saguntines did not have an alliance with Rome when the treaty between Hasdrubal formed. However, the Romans did not care about that, they wanted peace or war. The Carthaginians declared the Romans needed to choose, and the Romans chose the later. At this critical juncture, Carthage still held with Hannibal and wanted to help him.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal became a Carthaginian statesman and eventually grew in power. The Romans were scared that with Hannibal’s increase in power, he would lead another revolt against them. They made Hannibal give up his power and they exiled him. Hannibal traveled to many places including Tyrus, Ephesus, Crete, and Asia Minor. In Ephesus, King Antiochus, was at war with the Romans. Antiochus put Hannibal in control of one if his fleets, but he was defeated. After this, Antiochus was prepared to give Hannibal to the forces of Rome. Hannibal then fled to Crete, after a while, Hannibal was ready to go back to Asia Minor. King Prusias let Hannibal stay with him and Hannibal helped him in the war against Rome’s allies. Hannibal won many victories for Prusias, but the Romans let Hannibal keep helping him. They forced Prusias to hand Hannibal over. Hannibal was not ready to fall into the hands of the Romans. In 183 B.C. Hannibal ingested a deadly poison and…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While the Carthaginian government make some valid points in their explanation of the blame for the Second Punic War Hannibal. Both they and Hannibal can be seen to share the responsibility for Carthage’s defeat in the Second Punic War. Hannibal’s quixotic plot to attack Rome without a veritable intention to destroy her left Carthage stranded in a war that would ultimately turn against her. However, the circumstances and misfortunes faced in a war on foreign soil against the might of Rome can at times be seen as beyond Hannibal’s control.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    From a snapshot of the Second Punic War, the Carthaginians defeated the Romans while under the consul of Gaius Flaminius. The battle is considered one of the largest and most successful ambushes in military history. The battle consisted of around 50,000 Carthaginian soldiers versus about 30,000 Roman soldiers. The aftermath of the battle produced well over 15,000+ lost soldiers for the Roman army while Hannibal only lost approximately 2,500 of his own. Despite the overview of the battle, much more can be examined when looking at the events leading up to the brilliant ambush set by…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attila - a hun and a powerful chieftain. With 100,000 soldiers, he terrorized both halves of the empire.…

    • 777 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One general, wreaking havoc throughout the Roman lands was known as Hannibal Barca. Following in his father’s footsteps as a superior military general, he challenged Rome in battle every chance he could. After several attempts of coaxing Rome into battle he achieves a decent victory at the Battle of Trasimene in 217…

    • 1788 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hannibal Barca was one of the greatest Generals of his time. Although his abilities at developing battle strategies were unequaled in his day, the driving forces behind his successes as a general, were not only his superior military ability, but also his feelings of hostility toward the Romans. Because of his ability to plan and organize military campaigns he was able to succeed in crossing thousands of troops across the Alps to invade Italy. Hannibal, son of General Hamilcar Barca, showed hostility toward the Romans due to the fact that he had been indoctrinated in the theology of the Carthaginian god Baal. This indoctrination along with the fact that Rome and Carthage were enemies only served to fuel his hostility and aggression.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brutus showed the greatest amount of loyalty to his country. He killed a friend for what he thought would be a better Rome. He was loyal to his country but not to his friend.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is a great debate to decide whether Caesar was a tyrant or hero. Based on the information from the passage “Killing Caesar” by Jon Herman, Caesar is more a hero then tyrant. The average citizen of Rome felt that Caesar was a blessing.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Julius Caesar and Abraham Lincoln are two of history greatest leaders, to compare them in their similarity and differences in my opinion would a simple task to do. In comparing them, they both were assassinated in office, killed at the theatre, was great leaders, had power, authority, and was in the military. These two great leaders died at the young age of 56, and impacted history with change, which ultimately got them assassinated. President Lincoln was the 16th President of the United States of American and he believed in equality for all people, and Caesar was Robin Hood, who stole from the rich and gave to the poor. They had many enemies, they fought wars on the battlefield as well in their political arena.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rome rule its people in a very organize and civil manner, which draws loyalty among its citizens. Rome has an effective and distinct way in managing people, particularly to the inhabitants of their newly acquired lands and territories. One of the best example was the Latins in Latium, whose devotion and loyalty were exceedingly commendable, especially during the Second Punic War, where they fought valiantly--along with the Romans --against the forces of Hannibal. On other hand, Carthage "great advantage" was they have a "permanent able leader," that command its military forces. Unlike Rome, the order of its military resides in the hands of its civil magistrates, who were constantly replaced…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Hannibal Is To Blame

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Rome sent us into battle with about 80,000 men. Hannibal on the other hand, arrived at the battlefield with about 40,000 infantry and 10,000 cavalry. Hannibal was very smart with how he planned out this battle. He managed to put us in a position where we were stuck, in a valley, with a river. We would not be able to escape, our mobility being restricted and especially because during the battle because Hannibal had his army lines facing north, while we faced the south and unfortunately in the valley, wind gusts blew our way resulting in dust and grit getting into many our men’s eyes.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aztec Vs Incan Essay

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages

    did not make human sacrifices, they were known for their harsh mentality and lack of sympathy.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The least honorable character on Julius Caesar is Cassius because he is too jealous of Caesar. He wants to be a leader and take control. Cassius was with Brutus when he killed Caesar. Cassius is a very evil person. He tried to make it seem like he was all good when really he took over people.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    10th Grade Julius Caesar

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages

    perceives him to be a villain. Another person Brutus should not trust is Antony, because after…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays