Responding to the case
1. Why do you think Bill Martin is so concerned about his meeting with …show more content…
This lets the managers know that the entire employee’s under Bill work well and they appear to above average employees, and also get extra bonuses. The drawback is that since all of Bill’s employees are rated so highly, the area managers will expect them to perform extremely well next year. When the next annual review is done, the performance for that year is supposed to be high, but if Bill decides to take time to evaluate carefully, the result might be low. This makes the managers looks down on both Bill and his employees, and causes a chain of problems to Bill’s store. The employees, which are rated high, will no longer care about their responsibilities to the job and take the store fall down from the selling …show more content…
What could Bill do to improve the performance evaluation process in his store?
Instead if giving everyone a high score across the board in all criteria, Bill can apply an individual ranking system that forces him to review the individual performance of every employee and compare them to determine who has the highest performance and who has the lowest. This will ensure that there is only one best employee.
4. What are the legal issues Martin and other supervisors need to consider in conducting performance appraisals? Develop a list of guidelines Bill could follow to avoid legal problems?
To minimize legal problems, Bill and other supervisors should make sure that they carefully follow all performance appraisal policies and procedures set forth in the organization’s employee handbook (if it exists) and make every effort to avoid prejudice and discrimination.
List of guidelines:
1. Develop an appraisal form that relates specifically (or can be adapted to relate specifically) to the employee's job
2. Train the evaluators
3. Develop a rating scale
4. Safeguard against inaccuracy
5. Ensure against bias of the evaluator
6. Provide for cross-checks on the