Preview

Comparing Coworkers Against Each other

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
292 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Comparing Coworkers Against Each other
1. By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Overall I think that it can push /employees to work harder. Based on equality, appraisals should be based on a set of clear expectations, and employees should be ranked in a system that says they are falling below, meeting, or exceeding these expectations.

2. The equity theory focuses on employees being treated fairly in a work environment. This theory shows how employees react to the forced ranking method. People fill that the ranking method violates employees' rights

.
3. I think the best method would be to set goals, based on position expectations. The best way would be to give each employee action plans based on their position.
1. By implementing a forced ranking procedure, organizations guarantee that managers will differentiate talent. While conventional performance appraisal systems may allow managers to inflate ratings and award Superior ratings to all, a forced ranking system ensures that distribution requirements will be met. Overall I think that it can push /employees to work harder. Based on equality, appraisals should be based on a set of clear expectations, and employees should be ranked in a system that says they are falling below, meeting, or exceeding these expectations.
2. The equity theory focuses on employees being treated fairly in a work environment. This theory shows how employees react to the forced ranking method. People fill that the ranking method violates employees' rights.
3. I think the best method would be to set goals, based on position expectations. The best way would be to give each employee action plans based on their position.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    business 1

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6. According to equity theory, how does an employee determine whether he or she is being treated equitably?…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    BUS 303 Week 3 Assignment

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In many organizations - but not all - appraisal results are used, either directly or indirectly, to help determine reward outcomes. That is, the appraisal results are used to identify the better performing employees who should get the majority of available merit pay increases, bonuses, and promotions. By the same token, appraisal results are used to identify the poorer performers who may require some form of counseling, or in extreme cases, demotion, dismissal or decreases in pay. Whether this is an appropriate use of performance appraisal - the assignment and justification of rewards and penalties - is a very uncertain and contentious matter. This is probably what everyone thinks when they hear performance appraisals.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adam’s equity theory explains how employees might react to perceptions of both fairness and inequality (Fischer and Baack, 2013). Debbie’s decision to look for work elsewhere is due to the fact that her education level…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though performance appraisals can be good for the organization, it can also be a controversial management tool. Critics of performance appraisals have many compelling arguments against its use. They can have a false degree of accuracy, engenders dysfunctional employee conflict and competition, assigns an inordinate amount of responsibility to individual with poor work performance. Many will argue that these negative effects of appraisal can be fixed through genuine employee participation.…

    • 854 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The general function of performance management systems in organizations is for employers to manage employees’ performance and development by providing individual feedback on their performance evaluation to identify and plan measurable areas for personal development to ensure the organization’s strategic goals are being met (DeCenzo and Robbins, 2007). For years, many organizations provided appraisal type performance reviews to their employees that ranked them against other employees. This type of ranking system is problematic, as it is unfair to compare employees from different departments who’s primary goals may be different from one another and can viewed as putting down employees who may be unable to put in as many hours or as much effort as others who have only one set project at a time and can bog down to set higher numbers. If employee development is not properly measured and managed, the organization may find it difficult to meet their strategic goals. This in turn can create complications between mainstream workers and management, as well as the company, and their customers.…

    • 1442 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Performance Appraisal

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages

    An elemental, and the most common problem, is that the appraisal process is used for a variety of conflicting purposes (Strebler et al. 2001; Wilson 2002).Performance appraisal can be used to motivate employees to improve their performance by ascertaining clear objectives for future and also letting them know what is expected out of them. This is completely in contrast with the appraisal system that concerns distribution of rewards based on assessment of past performance. In this type of performance appraisal the appraiser is forced to…

    • 3095 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A manager rating an employee more severely than their work performance merits will create a frustrated and disgruntled employee. Workers will resent the unfair assessment of their performance. The opposite is also true, if a manager rates an employee more favourably than their performance merits “cheats them and the department of the benefits of exploring areas for improvement and the opportunities for developing and coaching” (MacKenzie, 2013)…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appraisal systems in any organization should be designed to motivate and encourage employees to give their best performance. The targets…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also giving employees responsibility, accountability and delegating appropriately are all processes which will increase involvement, commitment and enthusiasm for the achievement of specific outcomes and that, I believe, is a way to make a plan…

    • 1690 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Differentiation Framework

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This framework implements a process that requires managers to rank their employee performances into three categories; the top 20 percent, the middle 70 percent and the bottom 10 percent. It also requires managers to act on this performance rankings…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Individual Analysis

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to Robbins, Bergman, Stagg and Coulter (2003) equity theory was developed by J.Stacey Adam. Campebell, Dunnette and Miller (1969) states the purpose of this theory is aim at employees’ assimilation from a job situation. Kaplan, Reckers and Reynolds (1986) notes these are outcomes, in relation to the efforts they put in, inputs, and then compare with others.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A performance appraisal is a process in which a rater or raters evaluate the performance of an employee. Feedback may occur throughout the workday, but many organizations also have a more formal process of providing feedback to employees. As stated by Jonathan Segal, “The performance appraisal lets top performers know, in a concrete way, how much they are valued by the organization. As such, it is a necessary component of a comprehensive employee retention program” (Segal, 2000). A few of the benefits those appraisal systems can provide are: communicating deficiencies, ensuring consistency, distinguishing among employees, recognizing valued performers, and communicating strategic vision. The performance appraisal process requires supervisors to take note of what is lacking in employee performance at least once a year. Without this process, supervisors may be hesitant to tell an employee that their work is not up to standards. It may also increase the potential for consistency by ensuring that all similarly situated employees are evaluated on the same criteria.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Siegel Case Summary

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such systems often include the use of rating or ranking levels in which each employee is positioned. These systems often use quotas to place a part of top performers at the peak level and the worst performers at the bottom level. Such a system is considered to eradicate those within the organization who constantly perform below par. The system is able to work if employees are mindful of the standards for which they are graded in advance, so they can make the required modifications. It can also remove those inside the organization who are either not appropriate for precise jobs or simply lack the skills and abilities to execute their jobs efficiently (Myers,…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Forced Ranking

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I would recommend a forced distribution list to organizations that are large in size and are looking to create a process oriented approach. About 20% of Fortune 1,000 companies and growing are using this approach. “Some say forced ranking is not only the best method, but an essential practice to turn a struggling company into a market-dominating one.” (Bates, 2003) This approach is the best way to identify your high performing individuals and also the bottom performs who should be helped out. The high performers should be given promotions, financial incentives and training to grow within the company. A leadership development program can also be started after identifying the high performers. The low performers should be put on a performance improvement plan to get help. Low performers are not automatically fired for being in one bracket – warnings should always be given first. It should be looked at as a development tool. Forced ranking engages the manager to provide assessments of employees and forces them to communicate the tough stuff with their employees. It holds the managers accountable for their workforce. “The great value of using a forced ranking process doesn’t result merely from plunking people into different buckets,” he says. “The payoff comes from the action that is taken with each person following the assessment sessions.” (Bates, 2003)…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    code of ethics

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In this approach, my employees will have exercises and tests based on meetings, and there will be rewards for achievements that are being made, such as an outstanding employee who has been on top of their inventory for example. Setting goals for my employees to accomplish in a set amount of time.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics