Ethical Analysis
Ethical Analysis
Luis (Tony) Gonzalez
Indiana Wesleyan University
July 8, 2013
Professor Jones
I have read and understand the plagiarism policy as outlined in the IWU Catalog relating to the IWU Honesty/Cheating Policy. By affixing this statement to the title page of my paper, I certify that I have not cheated or plagiarized in the process of completing this assignment. I also certify that the work submitted is original work specific for this course and to my program. If it is found that cheating and/or plagiarism did take place in the writing of this paper, I understand the possible consequences of the act/s, which could include expulsion from Indiana Wesleyan University.
Ethical Analysis
Step 1: Relevant Stakeholders * Wayne Philips * The 12 employees * George Jeffers
Step 2: Noncompliance Issues * Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Step 3: Managerial Ethical Dilemma * How to allocate the funds fairly between the workers * How the funds was allocated in the past to a select few of the workers * The issue of the woman who received the raises in the past and their influence in the community and on his job if the same raise system does not continue * Lack of performance appraisals that leads to unethical decisions
Step 4: Dilemma Resolution Decisions * Allocate the funds even to all 12 workers * Distribute the funds so that all of the worker make the same amount * Conduct thorough job performance appraisals and allocate funds to each employee based on their performance * Continue to allocate the funds in the same manner as George did since the workers do not know how much each other makes an hour
Step 5: Biblical Analysis * The first resolution would be supported by the biblical principles of distributive justice which is the distribution of the funds allotted and equality which would be that they all get the same amount * The second resolution would be supported by the biblical
Luis (Tony) Gonzalez
Indiana Wesleyan University
July 8, 2013
Professor Jones
I have read and understand the plagiarism policy as outlined in the IWU Catalog relating to the IWU Honesty/Cheating Policy. By affixing this statement to the title page of my paper, I certify that I have not cheated or plagiarized in the process of completing this assignment. I also certify that the work submitted is original work specific for this course and to my program. If it is found that cheating and/or plagiarism did take place in the writing of this paper, I understand the possible consequences of the act/s, which could include expulsion from Indiana Wesleyan University.
Ethical Analysis
Step 1: Relevant Stakeholders * Wayne Philips * The 12 employees * George Jeffers
Step 2: Noncompliance Issues * Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act
Step 3: Managerial Ethical Dilemma * How to allocate the funds fairly between the workers * How the funds was allocated in the past to a select few of the workers * The issue of the woman who received the raises in the past and their influence in the community and on his job if the same raise system does not continue * Lack of performance appraisals that leads to unethical decisions
Step 4: Dilemma Resolution Decisions * Allocate the funds even to all 12 workers * Distribute the funds so that all of the worker make the same amount * Conduct thorough job performance appraisals and allocate funds to each employee based on their performance * Continue to allocate the funds in the same manner as George did since the workers do not know how much each other makes an hour
Step 5: Biblical Analysis * The first resolution would be supported by the biblical principles of distributive justice which is the distribution of the funds allotted and equality which would be that they all get the same amount * The second resolution would be supported by the biblical