Preview

Logistics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2268 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Logistics
CH1
60. (p. 2) What are the three reasons negotiations occur?
Negotiations occur for several reasons: (1) to agree on how to share or divide a limited resource, such as land, or property, or time; (2) to create something new that neither party could do on his or her own, or (3) to resolve a problem or dispute between the parties.
70. (p. 15) Describe the strategies and tactics a negotiator would employ in a distributive bargaining situation.
In distributive situations negotiators are motivated to win the competition and beat the other party, or gain the largest piece of the fixed resource that they can. In order to achieve these objectives, negotiators usually employ "win-lose" strategies and tactics. This approach to negotiation—called distributive bargaining—accepts the fact that there can only be one winner given the situation, and pursues a course of action to be that winner. The purpose of the negotiation is to claim value—that is, to do whatever is necessary to claim the reward, gain the lion's share, or gain the largest piece possible.
71. (p. 16) Why should negotiators be versatile in their comfort and use of both value claiming and value creating strategic approaches?
Not only must negotiators be able to recognize which strategy is most appropriate, but they must be able to use both approaches with equal versatility. There is no single "best", "preferred" or "right" way to negotiate; the choice of negotiation strategy requires adaptation to the situation, as we will explain more fully in the next section on conflict. Moreover, if most negotiation issues/problems have claiming and creating values components, then negotiators must be able to use both approaches in the same deliberation.
78. (p. 23) Where would you likely to find the concept of "yielding" on the dual concerns model?
Yielding (also called accommodating or obliging) is the strategy in the upper left-hand corner. Actors pursuing the yielding strategy show little interest or concern

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mgt 311 Business Plan

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    |Compromising- no one wins or loses. Both |Willing to ration the conflict and accept |The time it takes to come to a compromise…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would suggest the best negotiating style to apply to this will be collaborative style. Participation in joint problem solving is key for me. Secondly discovering and solving the real interest of both parties is another advantage of this style when applied to the case in question. Collaborative bargaining is a generic term that describes a variety of bargaining methods: win-win bargaining, collegial bargaining, consensus bargaining, cooperative bargaining, integrative bargaining, collective gaining and interest-based negotiations.They all involve a two-way discussion with the goal of mutual gains between the parties…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2006). Essentials of Negotiation, 4th edition. McGraw-Hill. Learning Solutions. New York, NY. Retrieved from http://digitalbookshelf.argosy.edu/…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hardball Research Paper

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Negotiation occurs in business, non-profit organizations, government branches, legal proceedings, among nations and in personal situations such as marriage, divorce, parenting, and everyday life.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    turn up

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The De Janasz chapter on negotiations describes two distinct approaches to bargaining: a “distributive bargaining strategy” and an “integrative bargaining strategy.” Describe at least one key difference between these two strategies. Then, describe an actual or hypothetical situation where adapting a distributive bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why), as well as one where adopting an integrative bargaining strategy would make the most sense (and why).…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants. Interests include the needs, desires, concerns, and fears important to each side. They are the underlying…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hbd6771 Ex4

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. List 5 ideas that can be used to avoid a win/lose situation in the negotiation process.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. What did the union do to prepare for negotiations? What additional sources of information might it have used? What were the union's primary objectives?…

    • 1187 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Using the Internet the author of this paper will find two articles that describe a negotiation situation that employs different negotiation strategies. The negotiation processes used in the selected articles will be described. The two strategies will be compared and contrasted and how they may apply in the work setting.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moreover, every negotiation starts with a process followed by a strategy because without either, then it would be just a disagreement with any kind of resolution to the issue. Key things that both…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cell Phone Negotiations

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Negotiation offers many things, which can affect how the negotiations will end. Factors play a big part in how parties work to achieve an outcome. Things like studying the opponent give insight on how the process will play out. Not only is the bargain range important to both parties but also each party should look at the other party’s gender differences, personality, culture, perception, cognition, and emotion.…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How to do well and reach the original goal with agreement during negotiation is long-term question in my mind. Before this topic learning, I knew a little about and scarcely use those influence tactics during negotiation.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Personal Power Types

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Lewicki, R., Barry, B., & Saunders, D. (2007). Essentials of Negotiation, 4th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Learning Solutions.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    miss

    • 2520 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In a negotiation, it is important to be able to distinguish between positions and interests - both yours and the parties' with whom you are negotiating. Depending on which one you decide to focus on will affect your negotiation style and influence the outcomes.…

    • 2520 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Getting Past No

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages

    3. Others position. Other party’s positional behavior, the habits for negotiations they might have could try to make you give in, they tend to think that your win is their lost.…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays