Preview

Integrative Decide Worksheet: Negotiation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1211 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Integrative Decide Worksheet: Negotiation
You Decide Worksheet
Name: IFE AKANMU
Course Section: Negotiation Skills
Date: 02/12/2014

Questions:

1. What is the appropriate negotiation strategy that would be most advantageous for Sharon and Jim in this scenario, distributive or integrative bargaining? What are the factors that should be considered in making this determination?
Integrative bargaining (also called "interest-based bargaining," "win-win bargaining") is a negotiation strategy in which parties collaborate to find a "win-win" solution to their dispute. This strategy focuses on developing mutually beneficial agreements based on the interests of the disputants. Interests include the needs, desires, concerns, and fears important to each side. They are the underlying
…show more content…
He is close to earning his degree. In addition to this, he has been working for one of our competitors for several years and has excellent references attesting to his ability. Thus, Jim’s Ivy League college, excellent references and his experience of working for competition are some of the brownie points Jim has on his side. He could be offered a better profile and given more responsibilities which a junior accountant can only dream of.
Jim knows that the firm has a solid reputation and is known for providing excellent developmental opportunities for its junior accounts. Since he has two years of professional accounting experience, this is an excellent opportunity that will help in building a strong foundation for his career as it will give him the exposure to the “best practices” of this firm.
The Accounting Supervisor is interviewing candidates for one of the accounting positions that recently became vacant. They desperately need to fill this position as it is critical for them to continue servicing their existing client base. Jim is an excellent candidate for this job. However, his salary expectations may exceed the level that the firm in its current position can
…show more content…
However, he cannot pay him as much as Jim is expecting and so he has to offer non-monetary benefits to Jim that may entice him to take the job. On the other hand, Jim wants to have at least a 10% increase in his current salary of $60,000 which is pretty reasonable. Now a possible outcome of this negotiation can be Supervisor offering $ 55,000 and 20% of total compensation as benefits and some very interesting projects for Jim to work on. Jim may accept this offer as the job profile sounds convincing and at this stage of his career, gaining hands-on is also very important. This is an example of integrative negotiation where both parties strike an understanding of each others’ needs and try to reach a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Amanda Smith is an experienced accountant that gained an entrepreneurial spirit and decided to start her own accounting firm. The company, Smith’s Accounting and Tax Service started off well and began progressing in the right direction. Amanda hired an assistant named Lisa who was entrusted with many of the most important tasks within the business. Eventually Amanda decided to expand her business and enter the tax services field. Amanda decided that she would need to hire additional accountants to handle the additional workload that her expansion required. She…

    • 2430 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    MGAD10 Assignment

    • 1871 Words
    • 10 Pages

    experience with a large public accounting firm and the notes he’s gathered from a previous…

    • 1871 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What is the appropriate negotiation strategy that would be most advantageous for Sharon and Jim in this scenario, distributive or integrative bargaining? List and describe the factors that should be considered in making this determination?…

    • 634 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mgt311 Week 4

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Which of the available conflict management strategies is most appropriate for the current situation with David and James? Provide your rationale, including what factors you considered in making your selection. Your response should be at least 100 words.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    HRM 595 Final Exam

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. Joe McDonald is the HR manager of ACME chemicals. His boss, Bill Jacobs, is concerned that the interactions between the various departments of the company are inconsistent and that there is too much competition between departments rather than cooperation. Bill has asked you about ways to improve the negotiations between business units. In your explanation to Bill, you need to explain the following: What are the three primary reasons that negotiations occur? What is the difference between bargaining and negotiation? Why must successful negotiations involve both tangible and intangible components? Do you think that ACME needs to pursue an integrative or a distributive approach to their future interdepartmental negotiations?…

    • 894 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would suggest the best negotiating style to apply to this will be collaborative style. Participation in joint problem solving is key for me. Secondly discovering and solving the real interest of both parties is another advantage of this style when applied to the case in question. Collaborative bargaining is a generic term that describes a variety of bargaining methods: win-win bargaining, collegial bargaining, consensus bargaining, cooperative bargaining, integrative bargaining, collective gaining and interest-based negotiations.They all involve a two-way discussion with the goal of mutual gains between the parties…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    Research Report

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2011). Essentials of negotiation (5th ed). New York, NY: Mcgraw-Hill.…

    • 3178 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Good to Great

    • 8353 Words
    • 34 Pages

    Jim has served as a teacher to senior executives and CEOs at corporations that include: Starbucks…

    • 8353 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hbd6771 Ex4

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. List 5 ideas that can be used to avoid a win/lose situation in the negotiation process.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    c) I think that in this situation, Bob White and Rod Andrew could not have taken a course of mutual gains bargaining. The most important factor to generate alternative solutions is to shift from positional bargaining to integrative negotiation, where both parties understand each other’s priorities and they agree on a common definition of the problem (Lewicki, Saunders and Barry, 2011). In this situation both parties have extremely hard positions and it looks like no one is willing to make any concessions. When Rod Andrew tried to come…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When setting the wage for the purchasing agent position Perkins and Balkin must consider their internal and external factors. Internal factors include compensation strategy of the organization, worth of the job, employee’s relative worth and employer’s ability to pay. A company’s compensation strategy is how they plan to compensate their employees in general terms. The worth of a job is just what it says, what that position is worth to the company in the revenue or cost savings it generates. External factors include conditions of the labor market, area pay rates, cost of living, collective bargaining and legal requirements. The labor market reflects how much supply and demand there is within the industry for a particular position.…

    • 302 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psyc 312

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Integrative solutions: a solution to a conflict whereby the parties make trade offs on issues according to their different interests, each side concedes the most on issues that are unimportant to it but important to the other side.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sluggers- Negotiation

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    8. What sorts of tactics/techniques did each party use to keep negotiations on track and avoid impasse?…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The parties come to a mutual agreement that can be a win-win, also considered integrative…

    • 273 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The third party that would benefit is Tom himself. As was stated in the case study (2014), many firms have reduced or halted their graduate intake as of 2014. It is apparent that Tom is struggling to find work, and is currently unemployed and not earning a income. It also known that Tom would be supervised for his first year of work (case study, 2014), which would benefit Tom himself as he lacks experience within accounting firms, and this would provide him with new skills.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays