Grammatical Difference Between British and American English.

Topics: English language, American and British English differences, British English Pages: 6 (1635 words) Published: November 6, 2008
Content

American English…………………………………………………2

Lexical difference…………………………………………………4

Grammatical difference…………………………………………..6

Bibliography……………………………………………….8

Grammatical difference between British and American English.

American English.

In the early part of the seventeenth century English settlers began to bring their language to America, and another series of changes began to take place. The settlers borrowed words from Indian languages for such strange trees as the hickory and persimmon, such unfamiliar animals as raccoons and woodchucks. Later they borrowed other words from settlers from other countries – for instance, chowder and prairie from the French, scow and sleigh from the Dutch. They made new combinations of English words, such as backwoods and bullfrog, or gave old English words entirely new meanings, such as lumber ( which in British English means approximately junk ) and corn ( which in British means any grain, especially wheat ). Some of the new terms were needed, because there were new and un-English things to talk about. Others can be explained only on the general theory that languages are always changing, and American English is no exception. Aside from the new vocabulary, differences in pronunciation, in grammatical construction, and especially in intonation developed. If the colonization had taken place a few centuries earlier, American might have become as different from English as French is from Italian. But the settlement occurred after the invention of printing, and continued through a period when the idea of educating everybody was making rapid progress. For a long time most of the books read in America came from England, and a surprising number of Americans read those books, in or out of school. Moreover, most of the colonists seem to have felt strong ties with England. In this they were unlike their Anglo-Saxon ancestors, who apparently made a clean break with their continental homes. A good many Englishmen and some Americans used to condemn every difference that did develop, and as recently as a generation ago it was not unusual to hear all “Americanisms” condemned, even in America. It is now generally recognized in this country that we are not bound to the Queen’s English, but have a full right to work out our own habits. Even a good many of the English now concede this, though some of them object strongly to the fact that Americanisms are now having an influence on British usage. There are thousands of differences in detail between British and American English, and occasionally they crowd together enough to make some difficulty. If you read that a man, having trouble with his lorry, got out his spanner and lifted the bonnet to see what was the matter, you might not realize that the driver of the truck had taken out his wrench and lifted the hood. It is amusing to play with such differences, but the theory that the American language is now essentially different from English does not hold up. It is often very difficult to decide whether a book was written by an American or an English man. Even in speech it would be hard to prove that national differences are greater than some local differences in either country. On the whole, it now seems probable that the language habits of the two countries will grow more, rather than less, alike, although some differences will undoubtedly remain and others may develop. It also seems probable that there will be narrow-minded and snobbish people in both countries for some time to come. But generally speaking, anybody who learnsto speak and write the standard English of his own country, and to regard that of the other country as a legitimate variety with certain interesting differences, will have little trouble wherever he goes.

Lexical difference.

Lexical differences of american variant highly extensive on the strength of multiple borrowing from spanish and indian languages, what was not in...

Bibliography: 1. Murphy Raymond. English Grammar in Use. - Cambridge University Press, 1997.
2. Орлов Г.А. Современный английский язык в Австралии. –Москва, «Высшая школа», 1978.
3. Варианты полинациональных литературных языков – Киев, «Наукова думка», 1981.
6. F.R.Palmer. Semantics. A new outline. - M. V.Sh. 1982.
7. Александрова С.Я. Семантический анализ сложноподчиненных предложений с придаточными, вводимыми союзами as и as thougt // Вопросы грамматической структуры предложения и текста в английском языке:Сб. науч. тр. - М., 1985. - Вып.247. - С.86-96.
10. Биренбаум Я.Г. Сопоставление сложноподчиненных предложений русского и английского языков // Сопоставительный лингвистический анализ: Науч. тр. - Куйбышев, 1977. - Т.202. - С.29-32.
11. Валимова Г.В. О сочинительных союзах в сложном предложении // Материалы IX и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения кафедр русского языка. - Ростов н/Д: Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971. - С.87-93.
13. Гвоздев А.Н. Современный русский литературный язык. Ч.2: Синтаксис. - М.: Просвещение, 1958. - 301 с.
14. Гепнер Ю.Р. Сложное предложение и принципы его изучения: Учеб. пособие. - Харьков, 1963.
18. Ильиш Б.А. Современный английский язык: Теорет. курс. : Учеб. пособие для вузов. -2-е изд., испр. и доп. - М., 1948. - 347 с.
19. Ильиш Б.А
21. Иофик Л.Л. Сложное предложение в новоанглийском языке. - Л.: Изд-во Ленигр. ун-та, 1968.
22. Карпова Л.В. О функциональном критерии в синтаксисе (на материале сложноподчиненных предложений с союзом as, when) // Некоторые проблемы слова и предложения в современном английском языке: Респ. сб. - Горький, 1976. - С.176-192.
23. Конькова И.П. Сложносочиненное союзное предложение в современном английском языке. Душанбе, 1969. - 240 с.
24. Леденев Ю.И. О наиболее существенных свойствах русских союзов // Русский язык: Материалы и исследования - Ставрополь, 1971. - Вып.3. - С.36-42.
25. Оганесова Р.Д., Скорлуповская Е.В. О выделении сочинительных союзов // Материалы IX и X конференций Северо-Кавказского зонального объединения кафедр русского языка. - Ростов н/Д: Изд-во Рост. ун-та, 1971. - С.94-102.
29. Семантико-стилистические исследования текста и предложения:Межвуз. сб. науч. тр. / Отв.ред. З.Я.Тураева. - Л., 1980. - 125 с.
30. Качалова К.Н., Израилевич Е.Е. Практическая грамматика английского языка с упражнениями и ключами. М, 1997. - 717 с.
31. Бархударов Л.С., Штелинг Д.А. Грамматика английского языка. - М., 1973.
32. Гальперин И.Р. Очерки по стилистике английского языка. - М., 1958.
33. Cronin A.J. The Citadel. - М., 1966.
34. Galsworthy J. To let. - М, 1954.
35. London I. Martin Eden. - М., 1954.
36. Green G. Quet Amerikan. - М., 1956.
37. Hardy T. Tess of the d’ Urbervilles. - М, 1950.
38. Dickens Ch
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • american english or british english Essay
  • Differences between British and American English Essay
  • Essay on Differences Between American and British English
  • Differences and Continuities Between British and American English Essay
  • Main differences between British and American English- an overview Essay
  • Essay about Difference Between British and American English
  • Differences Between British English and American English Essay
  • Idioms – Differences and Usage in American English and British English Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free