One such exception is a party to an oral communication. This exception follows the idea that an individual cannot expect what they tell another person will stay in confidence—unless there is some exception such as attorney-client privilege. Another exception is eavesdropping, like in situations where people should not expect that their conversations won't be overheard. A third exception is when a person agrees to the interception of communication. Law enforcement can use this communication in court against another person who was involved in the contact. An employee or agent of a communications provider can also intercept and disclose information to authorities. Victims of computer hacking can also allow communication to be intercepted. A system that is accessible to the public can have its information intercepted. Trap-and-trace devices, pen registers, and tracking devices are all not applicable under Title
One such exception is a party to an oral communication. This exception follows the idea that an individual cannot expect what they tell another person will stay in confidence—unless there is some exception such as attorney-client privilege. Another exception is eavesdropping, like in situations where people should not expect that their conversations won't be overheard. A third exception is when a person agrees to the interception of communication. Law enforcement can use this communication in court against another person who was involved in the contact. An employee or agent of a communications provider can also intercept and disclose information to authorities. Victims of computer hacking can also allow communication to be intercepted. A system that is accessible to the public can have its information intercepted. Trap-and-trace devices, pen registers, and tracking devices are all not applicable under Title