Preview

Corporate Governance

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
14611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Corporate Governance
Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (1998) 371±403

Corporate governance and board e€ectiveness
Kose John a, Lemma W. Senbet a b

1

b,*

Stern School of Business, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA Department of Finance, College of Business, University of Maryland, Tydings Hall, College Park, MD 20742, USA

Abstract This paper surveys the empirical and theoretical literature on the mechanisms of corporate governance. We focus on the internal mechanisms of corporate governance (e.g., corporate board of directors) and their role in ameliorating various classes of agency problems arising from con¯icts of interests between managers and equityholders, equityholders and creditors, and capital contributors and other stakeholders to the corporate ®rm. We also examine the substitution e€ect between internal mechanisms of corporate governance and external mechanisms, particularly markets for corporate control. Directions for future research are provided. Ó 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classi®cation: G30; G32 Keywords: Corporate governance; Corporate ®nance; Internal and external mechanisms of corporate governance

``E€orts to reform company government have concentrated on making managers afraid. It is time now to make boards greedy ' ' [The Economist, August 9, 1997]

* 1

Corresponding author. Tel.: 1 301 405 2242; e-mail: lsenbet@mbs.umd.edu. This paper was an invited paper on the occasion of the JBF 20th anniversary.

0378-4266/98/$19.00 Ó 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII S 0 3 7 8 - 4 2 6 6 ( 9 8 ) 0 0 0 0 5 - 3

372

K. John, L.W. Senbet / Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (1998) 371±403

1. Introduction Corporate governance deals with mechanisms by which stakeholders of a corporation exercise control over corporate insiders and management such that their interests are protected. The stakeholders of a corporation include equityholders, creditors and other claimants who supply capital, as well as



References: Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C., 1996. Firm performance and mechanisms to control agency problems between managers and shareholders. Working paper, Wharton School. Bange, M., Mazzeo, M., 1996. Board composition, board e€ectiveness and the observed form of takeover bids. Working paper. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI. Barnea, A., Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1985. Agency Problems and Financial Contracting, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cli€s, NJ. Baysinger, B., Butler, H., 1985. Corporate governance and board of directors: performance e€ects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1, 101±124. Bebchuk, L., 1988. A new method for corporate reorganization. Harvard Law Review 101, 775± 804. Berglof, E., 1994. The governance structure of the Japanese ®nancial kieretsu. Journal of Financial Economics 36, 259±284. Bhagat, S., Black, B., 1996. Do independent directors matter? Working paper. Columbia University, New York. Bhagat, S., Black, B., 1997. Board composition and ®rm performance: The uneasy case for majority-independent boards. Working paper. Columbia University, New York. Brander, J., Lewis, T., 1986. Oligopoly and ®nancial structure: The limited liability e€ect. American Economic Review 76, 956±970. Brickley, J., James, C., 1987. The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership structure: The case of banking. The Journal of Law and Economics 161±181. Brickley, J., Coles, J., Terry, R.L., 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics 35, 371±390. Chang, C., 1995. Performance-based compensation and outside interventions as alternative incentive mechanisms and the commitment role of the board. Working paper. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN. Chidambaran, N.K., John, K., 1997. Relationship investing and corporate governance. Working paper. New York University, New York. Demsetz, H., 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the ®rm. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375±390. Demsetz, H., Lehn, K., 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155±1177. Diamond, D.W., 1991. Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy 99, 688±721. Easternbrook, F., Fischel, D., 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. Fama, E., Jensen, M., 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 327±349. Franks, J., Mayer, C., 1994. The ownership and control of German corporations. Working paper. Business School. Fosberg, R., 1989. Outside directors and managerial monitoring. Akron Business and Economic Review 20, 24±32. Gale, D., Hellwig, M., 1985. Incentive compatible debt contracts: One period problem. The Review of Economic Studies 26, 327±349. Gertner, R., Scharfstein, D., Stein, J., 1994. Internal versus external capital markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 1211±1230. Gilson, S., 1990. Bankruptcy, boards, banks, and blockholders. Journal of Financial Economics 27, 355±387. Green, R.C., 1984. Investment incentives, debt, and warrants. Journal of Financial Economics 13, 115±136. 402 K. John, L.W. Senbet / Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (1998) 371±403 Grossman, S., Hart, O., 1980. Takeover bids, the free-rider problem, and the theory of the corporation. Bell Journal of Economics 11, 42±64. Harris, M., Raviv, A., 1988. Corporate governance: Voting rights and majority rules. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 203±235. Hart, O., Moore, J., 1989. Default and renegotiation: A dynamic model of debt. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1978. The insigni®cance of bankruptcy costs to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Finance 33, 383±393. Haugen, R., Senbet, L., 1988. Bankruptcy and agency costs: Their signi®cance to the theory of optimal capital structure. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 23, 27±38. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1997. Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. American Economic Review, forthcoming. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1988. The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics 19, 589±606. Hermalin, B., Weisbach, M., 1991. The e€ects of board composition and direct incentives on ®rm performance. Financial Management 101±112. Hirshleifer, D., Thakor, A., 1994. Managerial performance, boards of directors and takeover bidding. Journal of Corporate Finance 1, 63±90. Holderness, C., Sheehan, D., 1988. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 317±346. Jensen, M., 1989. Active investors, LBOs and the privatization of bankruptcy. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 2, 35±44. Jensen, M., 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance 48, 831±880. Jensen, M., Meckling, W., 1976. Theory of the ®rm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 48, 831±880. Jensen, M., Murphy, K., 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98, 225±264. Jensen, M., Warner, J.B., 1988. The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders, and directors. Journal of Financial Economics 20. John, K., 1993. Managing ®nancial distress: A survey and a research agenda. Financial Management, Autumn. John, T.A., John, K., 1993. Top-management compensation and capital structure. Journal of Finance 48, 949±974. John, K., Senbet, L., 1996. Limited liability, corporate leverage, and public policy. Working paper. New York University. John, K., John, T., Senbet, L., 1991. Risk-shifting incentives of depository institutions: A new perspective on federal deposit insurance reform. Journal of Banking and Finance 15, 895± 915. John, K., Saunders, A., Senbet, L.W., 1997. A theory of bank regulation and management compensation. Working paper. University of Maryland and New York University. John, K., Senbet, L.W., Sundaram, A.K. (1994). Corporate limited liability and the design of corporate taxation. Unpublished paper. University of Maryland and New York University. Kaplan, S., 1994. Top executive rewards and ®rm performance: A comparison of Japan and the US. Journal of Political Economy 102, 510±546. Kaplan, S., 1997. The evolution of US corporate governance: We are all Henry Kravis now. Working paper. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. Kedia, S., 1997a. Product market competition and top management compensation. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. Kedia, S., 1997b. Product markets and the strategic role of governance mechanisms. Working paper. Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. K. John, L.W. Senbet / Journal of Banking & Finance 22 (1998) 371±403 403 Klein, A., 1995. An examination of board committee structures. Working paper. New York University, New York. Klein, A., Rosenfeld, J., 1988. Targeted share repurchase and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 493±506. Kini, O., Kracaw, W., Mian, S., 1995. Corporate takeovers, ®rm performance, and board composition. Journal of Corporate Finance 1, 383±412. Lipton, M., Lorsch, J., 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 59, 59±77. Mace, M., 1986. Directors, Myth, and Reality. Harvard Business School Press, Boston. Maksimovic, V., 1986. Optimal capital structure in repeated oligopolies. Rand Journal 19, 389±407. Madan, S., Senbet, L., Soubra, B., 1995. Capital structure and the design of managerial compensation. Working paper. University of Maryland, College Park, MI. Mayers, D., Shivadashani, A., Smith, C., 1997. Board composition and corporate control: Evidence from the insurance industry. Journal of Business 70 (1), forthcoming. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1989. Alternative mechanisms for corporate control. American Economic Review 79, 842±852. Myers, S., 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 11±41. Noe, T., Rebello, M.J., 1996. The design of corporate boards: Composition, compensation, factions, and turnover. Working paper. Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA. Park, S., Roze€, M., 1996. The role of outside shareholders, outside boards, and management entrenchment in CEO selection. Working paper. SUNY, Bu€alo, NY. Rajan, R.G., 1992. Insiders and outsiders: The choice between informed and arm 's-length debt. Journal of Finance XLVII 1367±1400. Romano, R., 1993. The Genius of American Corporate Law. American Enterprise Institute Press, Washington DC. Rosenstein, S., Wyatt, J.G., 1990. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26, 176±191. Senbet, L., Seward, J., 1995. Financial distress, bankruptcy and reorganization. In: Jarrow, R., Maksimovic, V., Ziemba, W. (Eds.), Finance. North-Holland, Amsterdam. The New York Times, 1997. The Search for the Perfect Corporate Board. Schroder, U., Schrader, A., 1996. The changing role of banks and corporate governance in Germany: Evolution toward the market? Working paper. Deutsche Bank Research. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 94, 461±488. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52, 737±775. Shivdasani, A., 1993. Board composition, ownership structure, and hostile takeovers. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16, 167±198. Stulz, R., 1988. Managerial control of voting rights. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 25±59. Townsend, R., 1979. Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state veri®cation. Journal of Economic Theory 21, 265±293. Warther, V., 1994. Board e€ectiveness and board dissent: A model of the board 's relationship to management and shareholders. Working paper. USC. Weisbach, M., 1988. Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20, 431± 460. Wenger, E., Kaserer, C., 1996. The German system of corporate governance: A model which should not be imitated. Working paper. University of Wuerzburg. Whisler, T., 1984. Rules of the Game, Dow Jones ± Irwin, Homewood, IL. Williamson, O.E., 1983. Organizational form, residual claimants, and corporate control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 351. Yermack, D., 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40, 185±211.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    finance 340 exam study guide

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages

    We would expect agency problems to be less severe in other countries, primarily due to the relatively small percentage of individual ownership. Fewer individual owners should reduce the number of diverse opinions concerning corporate goals. The high percentage of institutional ownership might lead to a higher degree of agreement between owners and managers on decisions concerning risky projects. In addition, institutions may be able to implement more effective monitoring mechanisms than can individual owners, given an institutions’ deeper resources and experiences with their own management. The increase in institutional ownership of stock in the United States and the growing activism of these large shareholder groups may lead to a reduction in agency problems for U.S. corporations and a more efficient market for corporate control.…

    • 2722 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Eagles Electronics Case

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Giroud, X. & Holger, M. (2010) Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries, Journal of financial economics, 95, pp. 312-331…

    • 3249 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    0927-538Xr01r$ - see front matter q 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S 0 9 2 7 - 5 3 8 X Ž 0 0 . 0 0 0 3 2 - 9…

    • 11750 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Holmstrom, B. and S. Kaplan, 2003. The state of U.S. Corporate governance: What’s right and what’s wrong? Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15, 8-20.…

    • 11617 Words
    • 47 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. The Journal of Finance, 2(2), pp.737-738.…

    • 839 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    based target costing

    • 25666 Words
    • 103 Pages

    Baysinger, B., R. Kosnik, and T. Turk. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on…

    • 25666 Words
    • 103 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Adams, R., Ferreira, D., 2003. Diversity and incentives: evidence from corporate boards. Working Paper, University of Stockholm. Agrawal, A., Knoeber, C., 2001. Do some outside directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics 44, 179 – 198. Baysinger, B., Zardkoohi, A., 1986. Technology, residual claimants and corporate control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2, 339 – 349. Bertrand, M., Hallock, K., 2000. The gender gap in top corporate jobs. NBER Working Paper Series. Bilimoria, D., Piderit, S., 1994. Board committee membership: effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal 37, 1453 – 1477. Block, S., 1999. The role of nonaffiliated outside directors in monitoring the firm and the effect on shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial and Strategic Decisions 12, 1 – 8. Brick, I.E., Palmon, O., Wald, J.K., 2002. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism. Working Paper, Rutgers University. Brickley, J.A., Coles, J.L., Rory, T.L., 1994. Outside directors and the adoption of poison pills. Journal of Financial Economics 35, 371 – 390. Burke, R., Mattis, M. (Eds.), 2000. Women on Corporate Boards of Directors. Kluwer Academic Publishing, Netherlands. Carleton, W.T., Nelson, J.M., Weisbach, M.S., 1998. The influence of institutions on corporate governance through private negotiations: evidence from TIAA-CREF. Journal of Finance 53, 1335 – 1362. Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., Simpson, W.G., 2003. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review 38, 33 – 53. Catalyst Census of Women Board Directors of the Fortune 1000 as of March 31, 1999 (Catalyst, New York).…

    • 12771 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    results. In general, neither board composition nor board leadership structure has been consistently linked to firm financial performance. In response to these findings, we provide metaanalyses of 54 empirical studies of board composition (159 samples, n = 40,160) and 31…

    • 14343 Words
    • 72 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Naughton, K. The Global Six. (1999). Business Week (Jan. 25), 68–72. Orr, D. (1999). Executive compensation: Damn Yankees, Safe Haven. Forbes (May 17, 1999), 206–207. Reed, S. F., & Lajoux, A. R. (1995). The Art of M&A—A Merger and Acquisition Buyout Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill. Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business 59, 197–216. Ruback, R. S. (1982). The effect of discretionary price control decisions on equity values. Journal of Financial Economics 10(1), 83–105. Yates, B. (1996). The Critical Path: Inventing an Automobile and Reinventing a Corporation. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.…

    • 10852 Words
    • 44 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: 1. Berle, A.A. and Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. The Macmillan Company, New York, NY. 2. Dolmat-Connell, J. (2002). Carrots and Sticks. Forbes, p.42. 3. Jensen, M. (1986). Agency cost of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 4. Jensen, M. (1989). Eclipse of public corporation. Harvard Business Review 5. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, pp.305-360. 6. Jensen, M. and Ruback, R. (1983). The market for corporate control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11, pp. 5-50. 7. Lang, L., Stulz, R. and Walking, R. (1991). A test of the free cash flow hypothesis. Journal of Financial Economics, 27.…

    • 2496 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Agency Problem Essay 9

    • 9276 Words
    • 38 Pages

    needing the government to bail them out. The stage was set for the financial crisis that erupted in August 2007 and spread to the stock markets which experienced steep falls in stock prices in 2008 and early 2009. The financial crisis deepened into a global recession, the effects of which are still felt today. Analyses of the financial crisis suggest that the way executives of financial firms were compensated might have led them to take excessive risk spurring the crisis. Understanding executive compensation and the role of shareholders in that process takes us into issues involving the corporate form of organization, corporate goals, and corporate control, all of which we cover in this chapter.…

    • 9276 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Board of Directors

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages

    According to Jensen (1993), the board has the final responsibility for the function of the board. The job of the board is to hire, fire and compensate the CEO and to provide high level council. More precisely, the board has two major jobs: to monitoring the decision making of management as a representative of shareholders and to initiate and implement of decisions. The board of directors is a major mechanisms used to solve agency problem, which arises when the management and ownership is separated in the company. The board of directors is an internal control mechanism to make sure the company’s decision making is align with the interest of shareholders. In US and UK, in order to improve the effectiveness of corporate governance, both internal control and external control mechanism has been applied. The active market for corporate control in these countries forces the managers to improve firm’s performance for the threat of possible takeover. This essay will describe the nature of board of directors and then evaluate whether it is effective as a corporate governance mechanism.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Different authors view the meaning of corporate governance differently. For example, one school of thought describe corporate governance as a “system” by which companies are directed and controlled (Cadbury and Greenbury Report, CFACG 1992); another school views corporate governance as “structures and processes for decision making, accountability, control and behavior at the governing body” (Public accounts and Estimates Committee, 2002); to others corporate governance is about “finding ways” to ensure effective decision making (Pound 1995). But it must be kept in our mind that the fundamental concern of corporate governance is to ensure the conditions whereby a firm’s directors and mangers are held accountable, ensure better and effective protection to all stakeholders. The World Bank argues that the…

    • 2179 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research Paper Accounting

    • 27869 Words
    • 112 Pages

    T.C YED TEPE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: THE EFFECTS OF BOARD CHARACTERISTICS, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MATURITY AND TRANSPARENCY ON COMPANY PERFORMANCE By Sinan DÜZTAŞ Supervisor Prof. Dr. . Atilla D CLE Submitted to the Graduate Institute of Social Sciences In partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Management and Organisation) STANBUL, 2008 T.C YED TEPE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES CORPORATE GOVERNANCE:…

    • 27869 Words
    • 112 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    management

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages

    * I am grateful to Dansk Management Forum for providing me the data used in the paper, to the…

    • 3597 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays