Preview

Eagles Electronics Case

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3249 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eagles Electronics Case
Eagles Electronics Company Analysis
Name:
Course:
Tutor:
Date:

Table of Contents
Table of Contents 2
Introduction 2
Events in product market that could influence the share price of the Eagles Electronics 3
Events in capital market that could influence the share price of the Eagles Electronics 3
Sources of capital available to Eagles Electronics 3
Strategies to enhance share price value of Eagles Electronics 4
Residual theory of dividends 9
Reasons why sometimes firms opt for dividend cuts 9
Impact of dividend cut on Eagles Electronics 10 Impact of takeover of the company (Benefits) 13
Assessing impact of takeover of produtos compostos by eagles electronics 14
Conclusion 15
References 17
…show more content…
Firms are reluctant to opt for dividend cuts and they only do so under extreme circumstances (Roberts, 2008).
Residual theory of dividends
Divicut is a case where the company is forced to retain funds through lack of alternative financing options, with the explicit assumption that the firm is capital-rationed with access only to internal sources of finance. Dividends should be paid only when there are no further worthwhile investment opportunities. Having decided on the optimal set of financing, the firm should distribute to shareholders only those funds not required for investment financing (Modigliani & Miller, 1961)
Reasons why sometimes firms opt for dividend cuts Dividend omissions are strategically motivated to preserve financial flexibility within the firm and violations of company covenants, as dividend cuts occur frequently even among healthy firms and are not necessarily indicator of financial distress (Bulan, 2009). Brockman & Unlu (2009) point out that countries with weaker creditor rights, firms adopt more restrictive payout policies in order to mitigate the agency cost of
…show more content…
(1997) The art of mergers and acquisition integration: a guide to managing resources. New York, NY. McGraw-Hill
Amihud, Y. (2002) Illiquidity and stock returns: cross section and time-series effects. Journal of financial markets, 5, pp. 31-56. Breale, M. & Franklin, A. (2000) Principles of corporate finance: mergers and takeovers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
Chava, S. & Michael, R. (2008) How does financing impact investment: the role of debt covenants. Journal of finance, 63, pp. 2085-2121
Cremers, N. & Kose, J.2009, Takeovers and cross-section of returns: Review of financial studies, 22, pp. 1409-1445
DeAngeleo, H. & Douglas, J. (1992) Dividends and losses, Journal of finance, 47, pp. 183-863
Fama, F. & French, R. (2001) Disappearing dividends: changing firm characteristics, Journal of financial economics, 60, pp. 3-44.
Giroud, X. & Holger, M. (2010) Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries, Journal of financial economics, 95, pp. 312-331
Hackbarth, D. & Erwan, M. (2008) Stock returns in mergers and acquisition, Journal of finance, 63, pp. 1213-1252.
Jensen, M. (1986) Agency costs of free cashflow corporate finance and takeover, The American Economic Review, 76(2), pp.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Eugene F, F. & Kenneth R, F., 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Return. The Journal…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mini Case Chapter 17

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The dividend payout versus stock repurchase has changed dramatically during the past 30 years. First off the total cash distributions as a percentage of net income have remained the same fairly stable at around 26% to 28%, but the mix of dividends and repurchases has changed. The average dividend payout fell from 22.3% in 1974 to 13.8% in 1998, while the average repurchase payouts as a percentage of net income rose from 3.7% to 13.6%. Since 1985, large companies have repurchased more shares than they have issued. Ever since 1998, more cash has been returned to shareholders in repurchases then as dividend payouts. Second, companies today are less likely to pay a dividend. In 1978, about 66.5% of NYSE, AMEX, and Nasdaq firms paid a dividend. In 1999, only 20.8% paid a dividend. A portion of this reduction can be explained by the larger number of IPO’s in the 1990’s, since young firms rarely pay a dividend. Even though that doesn’t explain the whole story, as many mature firms now don’t pay dividends. Third is that relatively small number of older, more established, and more profitable firms accounts for most of the cash distributed as dividends and finally there is a considerable variation in distribution policies, as some companies pay a high percentage of their income as dividends and some pay none.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dividend Decision

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages

    15.4 Dividend Irrelevance Theory: Miller and Modigliani Model 15.5 Stability of Dividends 15.6 Forms of Dividends 15.7 Stock Split 15.8 Summary Terminal Questions Answers to SAQs and TQs 15.1 Introduction Dividends are that portion of a firm’s net earnings paid to the shareholders. Preference shareholders are entitled to a fixed rate of dividend irrespective of the firm’s earnings. Equity holders’ dividends fluctuate year after year. It depends on what portion of earnings is to be retained by the firm and what portion is to be paid off. As dividends are distributed out of net profits, the firm’s decisions on retained earnings have a bearing on the amount to be distributed. Retained earnings constitute an important source of financing investment requirements of a firm. However, such opportunities should have enough growth potential and sufficient profitability. There is an inverse relationship between these two – larger retentions, lesser dividends and vice versa. Thus two constituents of net profits are always competitive and conflicting. Dividend policy has a direct influence on the two components of shareholders’ return – dividends and capital gains. A low payout and high retention may have the effect of accelerating earnings growth. Investors of growth companies realize their money in the form of capital gains. Dividend yield will be low for such companies. The influence of dividend policy on future capital gains is to happen in…

    • 2110 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Chang, S. Suk, D. Failed takeovers, methods of payment, and bidder returns, Financial Review. 33 (2), May 1998.…

    • 2889 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Environmental Impact

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Ashkenas, R., Francis, S., & Heinick, R. (2011). THE MERGER DIVIDEND, Harvard Business Review, 89(7/8), 126-133.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The objective of this paper is to (1) critically review some of the factors that influences dividend policy of firms from a theoretical perspective (2) Analyze the last five-year dividend policy of Apple Inc. and Dell Inc. and discuss the factors that has influenced dividend policy in these firms over the period considered.…

    • 4738 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When Do Merges Create Value?

    • 19261 Words
    • 78 Pages

    Kehoe, M.R., 1996, "Franchising Agency Problems and the Cost of Capital," Applied Economics 28, 1485-1493…

    • 19261 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bruner, R. (2004). Where M&A Pays and Where It Strays: A Survey Of The Research. Journal Of Applied Corporate Finance. 16: 63-76.…

    • 9307 Words
    • 38 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Malatesta,P. H. 1983.The wealtheffect of mergeractivityandthe objectivefunctionsof mergingfirms.Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April):155-81. Masulis,R. W. 1980.The effects of capitalstructurechangeon securityprices:A study of exchangeoffers. Journal of Financial Economics 8 (June): 139-77. Miller,E. M. 1977.Risk, uncertaintyand the divergenceof opinion.Journal of Finance 32 (September):1151-68. Oskamp,S. 1965. Overconfidence case studyjudgments.Journal of Consulting Psyin chology 29 (June):261-65. Ruback,R. S. 1982.The Conoco takeoverand stockholderreturns.Sloan Management Review 14 (Winter):13-33. Ruback,R. S. 1983. The Cities Service takeover:A case study. Journal of Finance 38 (May):319-30. Ruback, R. S., and Mikkelson,W. H. 1984. Corporateinvestmentsin common stock. Workingpaper. Cambridge: MassachusettsInstituteof Technology, Sloan School of Business. Schipper, K., and Thompson, R. 1983. Evidence on the capitalizedvalue of merger activity for acquiringfirms.Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April):85-119. Tversky, A., and Kahneman,D. 1981.The framingof decisions and the psychologyof choice. Science 211 (January30): 453-58. Reprintedin Peter Diamondand Michael Rothschild. 1978. Uncertainty in Economics. New York: AcademicPress. Varaiya,N. 1985.A test of Roll 's HubrisHypothesis of corporatetakeovers. Working paper. Dallas, Tex.: SouthernMethodistUniversity, School of Business. Vermaelen,T. 1981.Commonstock repurchaseand marketing signalling: empirical An study. Journal of Financial Economics 9 (June): 139-84.…

    • 8676 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W. and Jaffe, J. (2005). Corporate Finance, Risk, Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting. (7th Edition). The McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fama, E. F., and K. R. French, 2001, "Disappearing Dividends: Propensity to Pay?," Journal of Financial Economics, 60, 3-43.…

    • 17604 Words
    • 71 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2005). Corporate Finance (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    CHAPTER IV ANALYSIS OF DIVIDEND PAY OUT TREND 4.1 Introduction Dividend policy has been a concern of significance in financial literature since inception of Joint Stock Companies. Dividends are commonly defined as the distribution of earnings (past or present) in real assets among the shareholders of the firm in proportion to their ownership.xxxix Dividend policy connotes to the payout policy, which managers practise in deciding the volume and pattern of cash sharing to shareholders over time. Managements’ principal aim is shareholders’ wealth maximization, which renders into maximizing the worth of the company as measured by the price of the company’s common stock. This goal can be achieved by giving the shareholders a “fair” payment on their investments. Payout policy is vital not only because of the quantity of money concerned and the recurring nature of the decision, but also because payout policy is narrowly associated to, and relates with, nearly every financial and investment decisions firms make. Managers must decide the level of dividends, what repurchases to make, the amount of financial slack the firm carries, investment in real assets, mergers and acquisitions, and debt issuance. Since capital markets are neither perfect nor absolute, all of these decisions interrelate with one another.xl…

    • 7522 Words
    • 31 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [16] Jensen, M., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American…

    • 14652 Words
    • 59 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brealey, R. A., & Myers, S. C. (2000). “Principles of corporate finance”. McGrawHill Cos, Inc.…

    • 20936 Words
    • 84 Pages
    Powerful Essays